dark light

pogno

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 661 through 675 (of 1,010 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Plastic Stirling #1106530
    pogno
    Participant

    A GRP construction method, as others have said, would be very heavy and difficult to do for such a large aircraft, you would need some sort of internal structure first. Using moulds is fine if your planning a production run, but for a one off it would be impractical.The James May Spit used an existing mould that will have been used many times before.You could do as in some Rutan designs and carve the basic shape from foam and then cover it with a layer of GRP to give it strength and rigidity but the Stirling has many flat or single curveture panels that cry out to be replicated in aluminium, just like the the original.
    A tubular frame made from steel tubes welded together to form a backbone frame then bulked out with MDF or ply frames with ally skinning would work. Or take another similar aircraft and reprofile it like someone did to a Dak to get a Wellington, but I cannot think of a suitable base for a Stirling.

    Richard

    pogno
    Participant

    A very practical choice would be a Bristol Freighter, and a real possibility with several good ones in museums(but all outside the UK Grrrr), and for a dream anything with a Napier Sabre.

    Richard

    in reply to: Looks like a Sopwith Pup? #1112788
    pogno
    Participant

    Ref
    A company in the US sells a whole range of replical WW1 aircraft, perhaps they are manufactured in Czech http://www.airdromeaeroplanes.com including a Pup,although the picture does look a bit more Camel than Pup.

    Richard

    in reply to: New Cat At North Weald #1113592
    pogno
    Participant
    in reply to: Spotted #1114180
    pogno
    Participant

    Is the additional expense to the MOD of operating the Skyvan strictly justifiable? Especially in view of the fact that the Skyvan is operated by a civilian company and due to their age the cost of maintaining them being high and spares an ever decreasing comodity.

    I would have thought the operating costs of a Skyvan compared to a C130 would be minimal, and allow a C130 to be used more usefully somewhere else.
    A few Skyvans still operate in the world, so I would guess spares are still being manufactured.

    Richard

    in reply to: suspicious photo #1128137
    pogno
    Participant

    It looks genuine to me. An aircraft that had belly landed then further damaged. I understand that sometimes interesting battle items were left with hidden explosive charges to catch the inquisative. Could this be the result of that happening .
    Also what is wrapped around the nearest propeller blade, is it a car tyre or part of the top engine cowling.

    Richard

    in reply to: BOAC equipment markings #1132297
    pogno
    Participant

    Had a thought that the numbers used in your example of 131/83/XXX may have comtained the ATA chapter in there, 83 is Accessary Gear Boxes which doesnt seem right for a watch. Instruments are 31.

    Richard

    in reply to: BOAC equipment markings #1132711
    pogno
    Participant

    Do you mean aircraft fitted equipment or ground equipment?
    For aircraft parts most of the parent workshops had a register from where new serial numbers were taken, usually prefixed BOA or BOAC. Mostly issued when a part that had not previously had a s/n needed one, such as following modification or needing tracking after becoming a lifed part for example. Sometimes also used when a part had lost its s/n but I would suggest that that was rare.
    Most significant components would use the s/n issued by the original manufacturer using their s/n sequence.

    Richard

    in reply to: Typhoon photo,what airfield #1137199
    pogno
    Participant

    Could it be Tangmere Airfield, that would make sense as that was there that the night fighter trials took place, using this aircraft, except in the picture it is before it was converted to a night fighter.

    Richard

    in reply to: What Is This??? #1137230
    pogno
    Participant

    It looks as if it would have been seriously directionally unstable to me, with that long flat sided foreward fuselage countered with only those two very small fins/rudders, bet it would have ended up with a whopping great fin on the fuselage if it had become reality.

    Richard

    in reply to: Event on History of RAF Greenham Common, Berkshire, Dec 6 #1138189
    pogno
    Participant

    Fender
    I am interested in this talk, having lived close to Greenham throughout my younger days and seen it go from a busy SAC base to closure.
    Just one point, I guess you mean 6 Dec 2009.

    Richard

    in reply to: Bristol 170 Mk.32 Superfreighter #1143877
    pogno
    Participant

    Herewith the picture, as promised. Taken at Southend 25 Nov 1964.

    Lovely picture. I like the fact the captain has his window wide open, just to get the full benefit of the engine sound, id’e like to think. More likely it being just a hot day.

    Richard

    in reply to: Inter-war marine aircraft around Malta #1144080
    pogno
    Participant

    The French flying boat is a C.A.M.S.55.1 of Escadrille 4E1 powered by Hispano-Suisa engines. Based at Karouba, Tunisia in 1930.

    Richard

    in reply to: What are these? #1148256
    pogno
    Participant

    Incidentaly production Trident foreward fuselages as well as doors and other parts were built in the old Airspeed factory at Portsmouth airport.

    Richard

    in reply to: Can Anyone Id The Background In This WW2 Photo? #1149116
    pogno
    Participant

    It could be Old Sarum but how many airfields would fit the scene with a row of Belfast Truss hangars, quit a few I suspect.
    Incidentally the aircraft seems to have the rockets fitted to the rails, are they complete or should they have a weapon head attached, like when used on Typhoon’s.

    Richard

Viewing 15 posts - 661 through 675 (of 1,010 total)