Two Lancastrians VH737 and VH742 were fitted with Nenes in the outboard positions only, in 1946, Merlins remained inboard.
I suspect it was the high fuel burn of the jets that made this impractical, they would have gone like the clappers but only for a short while, an indication might be in the fuel carried, 740 galls for the Merlins and 2,385 galls of kerosene for the Nene,s.
The same was said of the Jet Viking, that had the range for a quick trip to Paris but not much more.
Richard
Cracking shots there Pogno, those C-133s are lovely, dad hated them because they always shaked the house when leaving St Mawgan.
Thats something I had forgotten, C133’s on Green One passing Newbury would make the window resonate way before you could hear them. Remember standing in the rain as one passed by. Now the only thing to rattle the windows is a Chinook.
Incidentally the G- reg aircraft in the background of the Herc is a Piaggio P166 Albatross. Some were UK registered, G-APNY and G-APWT for example but I cannot be sure of the one in the picture.
Richard
The second picture is of a Douglas C133 Cargomaster.
Not sure but the registration on the fin looks like 62001 which makes it a C-133A full registration 56-2001.
These were fantastic aircraft with a very distinctive drone sound that could be heard for ages as it passed by at altidude. They suffered from severe airframe fatigue especially the foreward fuselage and consequently had a short life.
Although one was operational in Alaska until recently. Used for moving outsize loads to remote airfields.
Richard
Mark V
The point I was making was that for preserved aircraft, all possible effort should be made to seperate the airframe from risks. I accept we have lost some aircraft to fire over the last few years but on the whole the losses are less than from within the airworthy catagory.
I am also not suggesting we should ground all the flyers or pull things out of meseums and try to fly them. The balance is probably about right as it is.
Richard
For an aircraft to be considered ‘preserved’ it it must be in a storage condition that protects it from any damaging influences, ie humidity,sun light,fire,vermin,insects and vandalism. So that in 50 or 100 years time it will be substantially the same as it is now.
Any aircraft that is flown is not in this catagory as for one it is at risk of accidental destruction due to crash/fire.
Richard
I always thought that the restriction on full aerobatic flight was because the wings are the original units and not new build. Subsequently the CAA have imposed a limited display restriction because of the spars.
A long while back, about 1970, I was involved with a group at LHR wanting to take on some aircraft restoration, and Shuttleworth were approached. The instigator was a very nice chap, Roy Pullen, a BA 747 captain. as a result we were offered part of the work on Z7015. The whole airframe had already been sent to Dowty who were starting work on the fuselage. The wings and tail were redirected to us at LHR.
One wing had a large area of damage and one tip was squashed after it had been driven over, both caused during filming. All this and many other snags were repaired using repair schemes drawn up within BA. The spar bushes were removed and the spars crack checked, presumably X-rayed. The repairs are visible if you look. The spars were given a full NDT inspection as I remember but the wings were not fully dimantled which is why the CAA have imposed the limitation, I believe.
The project ended for us after the wings had been completed, the tailplane needed new steel spars, not available at that time. Dowty subsequently passed the fuselage back to Shuttleworth where it all sat until the project was restarted years later.
Most Hurricanes restored recently have new build wings fitted, without spar limitations.
Richard
A friend visited RAF Aston Down in Gloucester when he was working at Boscombe Down, there he found numerous Harvard parts including mainplanes, many useful bits were liberated back to Boscombe for their aircraft, others swopped for much needed spares.
He said that Aston had an enormous amount of stored aircraft components in the 50 odd hangars dotted all over the site but this was a few years ago, probably 18 or 20. Is it still there.
One hangar was full of green goddess fire engines, where a couple of chaps spent their entire time replacing batteries, tyres and engine oil so they were ready to go at a moments notice, not due to use, just a constant maintenance scheme.
Richard
Further news report http://www.itvlocal.com/meridian/news/?player=MER_news2_26&void=119556
If health and safety is an issue then surely that applies to everyone, without exception. The Police seem to think they are exempt.
The TV news report is followed by an item on the Solent flying boat crash on the Isle of Wight.
Richard
Found this Video news report showing airfield with parked aircraft.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/newsid_7090000/newsid_7096700/7096767.stm?bw=bb&mp=wm&news=1
Richard
The engine cutting under negative ‘G’ was caused by over rich mixture. A partial fix was the RAE fuel restrictor. Later a negative ‘G’ SU carb was developed, which helped but did not solve the effect.
Merlin 66 and 70 series used a Bendix design injection carb which cured the problem.
Later the Merlin 100 series used single point injection the fuel being injected into the centre of the supercharger.
JohnH
I always understood that the cause(I stand corrected if its wrong) of Ormonde’s crash was Torque roll at low altitude. He performed a slow fly past and then applied power too quickly, the aircraft rolled and struck the ground inverted, he and a German boy passenger died instantly.
A very sad loss, especially as it happened only a week or so after he was a star at the Greenham show.
Richard
A Wasp(Westland) passed Petersfield area yesterday heading south towards Portsmouth.
Richard
The Blanik airframe life was as a result of their use in Australia where the weather was soarable virtually all year round, consequently the aircraft built up considerable flying time. Unfortunately this let to a couple of accidents where the wings folded due to fatigue failure of the structure.
Richard
Alex
I know of a couple of sites that cover Hampshire and Dorset air crashes, probably similar sites exist for other counties. Just google under Hampshire air crashes. It does seem to be unavailable at the moment though.
Richard
The doped on fabric is to improve strength and water proof the float, but the fact that someone made it out of wood in the first place seems to indicate a special requirement, metal construction had become the norm in the Mid 1920’s. Wooden propellers are often fabriced and doped for the same reasons.
During development of racing aircraft for the Schneider Trophy, float design would have been very much trial and error in and attempt to get the best compromise between bouyancy, directional stability, aerodynamic drag, strength etc. Perhaps its from some of these trials.
Only other use I can think of is a Hydoplane of some sort, this being one of a pair if floats.
AIRMAC Can you confirm whether it is symetrical as its difficult to tell from the pics, especially around the step. And is that a piece of wood making some sort of fixed rudder?
Richard