Joint Strike Missile
There are plans to develop a multi-role version of the NSM, with ground strike being an option. This missile will be integrated with the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II “Joint Strike Fighter”, and might be integrated with the Eurofighter and the JAS 39 Gripen as well. Studies have shown that the F-35 would be able to carry two of these in its internal bays, while additional missiles could be carried externally.According to Kongsberg, this “multi-role NSM” is the only anti-ship missile that will fit inside the F-35’s internal bays.[1] Lockheed Martin and Kongsberg have signed a joint-marketing agreement for this air-launched version of the NSM, called the Joint Strike Missile (JSM). The project is funded by Norway and Australia.[2][3] The JSM is planned to feature a two-way communications line, so that the missile can communicate with the central control room or other missiles in the air. By September 2007 the missile development is still only at the planning stage.[4]
Improved features for the Joint Strike Missile include:
Ability to attack sea and land based targets
Multiple arial launch platforms (F-35, Gripen NG, Eurofighter Typhoon, MH-60 Seahawk, P-8 Poseidon)
Longer range than NSM
Long-term, production start in 2013
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_Strike_Missile
See also:
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/lockheed-kongsberg-partner-to-bring-nsm-to-jsf-03015/
http://www.janes.com/extracts/extract/jalw/jalw3691.html
Back to Indian navy?
they have stressed tested the design haven’t they:eek: tested on models the effect of having a massive ski jump on a design which never had anything like that before. sea trials will be interesting.
1. It is not massive, its big but largely hollow.
2. It is not that no weight was removed from the foredeck and bow. Including: 6 × twin SS-N-12 Sandbox SSM launchers (with 12 missiles, each weighing 5 tons), 12 × 8-cell SA-N-9 vertical SAM launchers (96 missiles each 167 kg ), 2 × 100 mm gunmounts with below decks reloading devices (35 tons each without ammo), 4 × AK-630 30 mm CIWS mounts (each about 2 tons) plus 2x MR-123 radars (each 1 ton), 2 × RBU-6000 anti-submarine rocket launchers with rounds and below automatic reloading system (and a fair chunk of superstructure at flight-deck + 1 level). That’s at least 150-200 tons in weaponry alone, not counting the removed deckhousing and crane.
Possibly there is, just aft of the funnel. Although, I’ve heard an opinion that the bigger radome is Koral satellite datalink and the radome aft of funnel is Centaur satcom.
Right, just below the left side of that rear radome. There’s a bunch of small domes added around the rear mast too, aside from Monolit.
In Talwar class Garpun-Bal is placed on the top of bridge without any radome. The radome on hangar top both in Talwar and 956EM AND Jaroslav is Pozitiv radar of Kortik FC module. That’s why I said that radome at the base of the main mast is Monolit and there should be another on other side. Obviously, they didn’t find a better place for it, possibly due to EM interference.
There should be some light bulbs too then, don’t you think?
Enough of that petty fanboy pissing contests:mad::mad:
Here’s something new and exiting…Point of interest, Urans and what appears to be a Mineral FCR…
Yaroslav Murdy
That image is a bit odd. Take for example, the red along the waterline.
The second NEUSTRASYMY class was supposed to be armed with BrahMos, but the MURDY seems to carry Uran. I was wrong about the BrahMos? So the standard missile will be the Uran? In such a case seems NEUSTRASYMY vessels underarmed.
It’s got 6 nice big 553mm torpedo tubes which, in addition to heavy weight torpedos, may also launch missiles.
The second NEUSTRASYMY class was supposed to be armed with BrahMos, but the MURDY seems to carry Uran. I was wrong about the BrahMos? So the standard missile will be the Uran? In such a case seems NEUSTRASYMY vessels underarmed.
It’s got 6 nice big 553mm otpedo tubes which, in addition to heavy weight torpedos, may also launch missiles.
I think it was not removed but cutted to the face
Got any source for that? Cause I don’t think so. Google Earth to ‘Norfolk VA’ or ‘San Diego, CA’ and zoom in closely on some of the Perry class ships there: where the launcher arm was it looks like a cover, not a cut .
Which vessel are you talking about Wan?
PTOEIII! :rolleyes:
If they want an anti air capability the easiest route is to mount the LY60 box launcher from the Type 21 as they are retired.
But, just three (out of six) Type 21s have the LY60… and where go the Harpoons that the other three carry?
Just the launcher arm was removed and a plate bolted over where it used to be. None of the below spaces equipment was removed, just placed in layup and no longer maintained.
So, you are expecting the arm to be remounted. Then the question becomes, what missile (SM1MR or SM2MR), assuming the STIR is easily refitted too?

Pretty much a modernised version of the Serviola OPV’s built for the spanish Navy in the early 1990´s.
That image is from 2003. A year later, she no longer has the Mk13 and STIR. So, wondering what “The frigate will be refurbished with anti-submarine missile and other latest systems at a cost of $ 65 million. ” wil entail.
Source of both photo’s: http://www.navsource.org/archives/07/0708.htm
Salvaged all expensive systems, put in a little protection, hoping for the best for the hull after the storm subsides …
Ugly and overloaded with a multitude of weapon systems. Hideous! Yuck! :diablo: