dark light

Wanshan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,341 through 2,355 (of 3,544 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion Part-2 #2052827
    Wanshan
    Participant

    One more, note the different sensor globes

    I think te sensor is the same, just that the one on the right has a protective visor-like cover added.

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion Part-2 #2052959
    Wanshan
    Participant

    I have never heard of PALACH, do you have more information on it?:confused:

    Also know as PALMA > twin 30mm gatling + 2×4 SOSNA-R hypersonic sam + optical guidance

    http://worldnavy.info/arms/missiles-ciws/palma_sosna-r_1.html

    in reply to: Help!A question about submarine #2052965
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Possibly! Sail is different as is the position of the dive planes.

    Plenty of images of Dolphin class here: http://www.israeli-weapons.com/weapons/naval/dolphin/Dolphin.html

    http://www.israeli-weapons.com/weapons/naval/dolphin/dolphin_s1.JPG

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion Part-2 #2052970
    Wanshan
    Participant
    in reply to: Help! Who can identify this one? #1795363
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Thanks a lot!:)

    You’re very welcome.

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion Part-2 #2053283
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Lets look at exactly what was said…

    So they have built a dock designed to build large LNG tanker vessels to the west, and anticipate using said docks also for the production of aircraft carrier vessels. The project they are talking about will be “not less than” 100m long but then there are frigates like the Neustrashimyy that are not less than 100m long… 129m in fact. Perhaps the new carrier will be a double hulled cat design. If the requirement is fleet air defence then catapaults would only be needed for AEW aircraft. Making it nuclear powered would greatly improve its reach, and also provide lots of electrical power for an EM catapault if they want heavy AEW on board.
    Talk of multiroled modular vessels suggests its escorts might not be custom designed like AEGIS cruisers, but a modular cruiser escort with fairly heavy air defence armament based on S-400 type weapons would be quite potent.

    Compare a carrier of just over 100m length with 30 combat aircraft including fixed wing and rotary wing aircraft with the current Kuznetsov which is 300m long and has about 54 operational aircraft on board.

    Personally I think these new carriers might be relatively cheap to buy and operate and could be used in pairs to provide 24/7 coverage of a naval unit. For smaller navies individual or pairs of such vessels might be much more affordable than even a single Kiev or larger class vessel.
    They would likely be flexible enough to act as helo carriers for disaster efforts too and with nuclear propulsion should be able to get to disaster areas quicker.

    There’s no way IMHO that there will be a carrier ‘just over 100m with 30 combat aircraft’. The smallest carrier in service that I’m aware of is the Royal Thai Navy ship Chakri Naruebet: Length 182.6m overall, Draught 6.2m, Flight deck 174.5m x 27.5m. The ship is equipped with six multi-mission Sikorsky S-70B Seahawk helicopters, supplemented with six ex-Spanish Matador AV-8S (Harrier) short take-off/vertical landing (STOVL) aircraft. The flight deck, which terminates in a 12° ski jump, can accommodate five simultaneous helicopter take-off/landings; the hangar provides space for ten medium helicopters or Harrier-sized aircraft.

    in reply to: Help! Who can identify this one? #1795374
    Wanshan
    Participant

    MEADS – Medium Extended Air Defence System (Germany / Italy / USA)

    http://www.army-technology.com/projects/meads/images/MEADS_10.jpg

    http://www.army-technology.com/projects/meads/images/MEADS_13.jpg

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion Part-2 #2053360
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Tell me about it…and it doesen’t help if you cannto speak russian and sweap around their corners:( …

    …which brings me to my next request: (sorry to highjack this thread)
    In http://www.atrinaflot.narod.ru/ in the Neustrashimmy section there are four small drawings in the bottom which seems to show some alternative export configurations of modernised Neustrashimmyy design. Unfortunetly those pics don’t open (well they do, but in the same size as the orginals which are little smaller than poststamps). I belive one of the drawings is the one showed in the attachments. Have anyone by any change the others?

    A model of this was dispayed at IMDS 2007. See acig.org, the NCIG area.

    in reply to: JMSDF 16DDH #2053364
    Wanshan
    Participant

    So given China has never operated a flat-top, it should move even slower than that?

    You mean the last 60+ years of peace?

    China in fact HAs moved slower than that (if you consider it’s purchases of carriers, for study purposes)

    Exactly, ust like I mean 60+ years of peace with Germany, yet my country and all of its neighbours gets a little queezy when there’s talk of German leadership in Europe. Duh.

    in reply to: JMSDF 16DDH #2053369
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Has the West ever apologized for everything? It was the only one to ever literally try to take over the world. Which also resulted in the rise of communism in China. When does the West appologize for that?

    “The west” is too broad a term, you need to be more precise. I know for a fact that my country has made apologies to severel countries, related to the colonialist period. Of course, the topic at hand is not an east-west issue.

    Wanshan
    Participant

    Well, the design is very flexible and at a reasonable cost. So, its easy to see why LHA/LHD types are becoming so popular……………With the advent of the forthcoming STOVL F-35B Lightning. That should only increase……..:D

    Of course, AV8B was always available so I don’t see why F-35B all of a sudden will make a big difference: why would countries that didn’t buy into Harrier-carrier now buy into F-35B/LHA?

    in reply to: JMSDF 16DDH #2054007
    Wanshan
    Participant

    China’s reportedly building (or will be soon) reasonably large ships and it has never built an aircraft carrier.

    And? I didn’t say the Japanese can’t DESIGN and BUILD a large aircraft carrier. I saod it would be wise to ease back into flattop operations, which includes training a sufficient number of pilots and developing carrier operation strategy and tactics that at of this day an age.

    If no one else had plans for dedicated aircraft carriers you might have a point, but as Scooter said given China’s programme I don’t think anyone’s going to care about that now. It’s also ridiculous to have one rule for Japan and another rule for China.

    It is not ridiculous to have such a rule, given recent history and perceptions among some Japanese of Japan’s role and actions. Having said that, there also must come a point were one has to start trusting again, step by step. Same applies for Germany. If any navy in the region can handle it, it would the JMSDF. But it can’t behave like an elephant in a porcelein cabinet.

    in reply to: JMSDF 16DDH #2054100
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Why only small, STOVL carriers? Why not larger ones (say somewhere between the Charles de Gaulle and planned HMS Queen Elizabeth) and CATOBAR?

    Because Japan has been out of the carrier business for so long. IMHO it would be better to start small, e.g. with a progression from 16DDH, to get back into things and only then go for some larger ships. Added advantage is that is would signal restraint in naval build up to any concerned friendly neighbours.

    in reply to: JMSDF 16DDH #2054311
    Wanshan
    Participant

    If other regional powers build carriers, I see no reason why Japan should not build small STOVL carriers like e.g. like the ones that the Thai got.

    in reply to: Humor in Uniform #2054424
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Time we livened this place up a little, the world is depressive enough as it is, so lets re-visit all those old joke and share some funny pics and have a bit of a laugh again.

    Here’s a pic that was sent to me from a friend who was able to catch it on camera finally- the anual Sub Race.

    9th INTERNATIONAL SUBRACES CONCLUDE WITH NEW WORLD SPEED RECORDS
    Canadian Submarine OMER5 cracks 8-Knot Barrier

    in Human-Powered Engineering Design Competition…

    http://www.isrsubrace.org/

Viewing 15 posts - 2,341 through 2,355 (of 3,544 total)