dark light

Wanshan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 556 through 570 (of 3,544 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2030955
    Wanshan
    Participant

    I’m looking at those pics of 11356M with VLS shtil ..and correct me if i’m wrong but there are 32 cells ? No ? And eache cell is supposedly holding a missile of 400mm in diameter.

    Now here we have Gorshkov with the redut AD.

    http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/5378/10753863.jpg

    Redut is supposed to house is 9M96 familly of missiles which are 240mm in diameter. Now how come then that Gorshkov has less cell’s for AD missiles then Grigorovich ? shouldn’t it have more and not less ? Gorshkov is also bit larger ship and the space for another UKSK doesn’t explaine it. You can easilly have 16 cell’s for AShM on Grigorovich by getting rid of RBU-6000 and using that space for it. Like it’s done on the Gorshkov.

    Could it be Redut takes up more space on account that’s it’s housing 48N6 missiles ?

    Edit

    Nevermind, I forgot about the quad-packed 9M100. Which explaines everything.

    3×12=36 cells on 11356M
    2×14=28 cells on 22350 with a mix of single and quadpacked rounds
    Shtil single rail launcher = 24 rounds.

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2030957
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Why will spare parts be a major issue as time goes on? Machinery is all new.

    20 years old, but not much of it was spent at sea, plus the modernization is a thorough reconstruction. Basically a new ship at this point.

    Essentially same propulsion plant as Kuznetsov and (likely) Varyag. These will need spares to. So, 3 big ticket ships to support: figure that’s enough to keep producing most spares.

    Gorshkov spent about 5 years ‘in service’ befor being retired. Some neglect but very low milage.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2031182
    Wanshan
    Participant

    With regards to VL Shtil, I thought it was installed on the second batch of Talwar frigates? It showed up in the models…

    Good point. Not only is the VL launcher farm present, they – the project 11356M ships ordered for the FRS Navy, not the 11356 batch 2 for the – also are projected to carry Orekh target illuminators associated with Shtil (so, it is reasonably certain the VL farm will not be used to fire other missiles. such as is the case with project 20380).
    http://www.mdc.idv.tw/mdc/navy/othernavy/11356m.jpg

    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-lZ6ZgLl4-Eo/TZwb-ih-LCI/AAAAAAAAACw/CZyFsqQwEqk/s1600/Project+1135.6+Batch+2+FFG.jpg

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2031186
    Wanshan
    Participant

    a few problems,
    naturally Luznetsov won’t get you anything because it’s Kuznetsov 😉

    secondly you could use better search terms like Su-33 take off, or F-18E take off, etc

    no problems finding an F-18E picture on a carrier with something more than just 2 A2A missiles

    :rolleyes: Obviously I didn’t search with L******** :rolleyes:

    I did search also with aircraft type and ‘take off’. I considered only for actual take-offs, not ‘on the ramp’ or ‘on deck’. While you may find more than for “su-33” it isn’t a whole lot more that you find, especially keeping in mind that US planes do actually see combat regularly whereas the SU-33 doesn’t at all. Further, there is the role differences, as was pointed out by another poster. Finally, many actual take off shots are from the rear aspect, and any combat payload is obscured by the wing areas.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2031259
    Wanshan
    Participant

    anyone got pics or videos of Su-33 or MiG-29K taking off the carrier with a decent load?

    Tried this googling ‘Luznetsov’ + “Su-33” with not much success.
    Also tried this googling “CVN” + “F/A-18E” with equally limited sucess.

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2031293
    Wanshan
    Participant

    :rolleyes: Do you think the MoD is going to send us secret papers.

    That the IAC is going to be 65000 tons has been public for a while published in dti/AW many times.

    Pay attention, I was not referring to the 65k tons.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2031437
    Wanshan
    Participant

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quxhj0bwcj8&feature=player_embedded#!

    Vertical launch being tested for Buk- I think this makes it clear vertical Shtil was not a paper project.

    VL HHQ16 – a Buk derivative – is confirmed. Why would one assume VL Shtil to be a paper project then?

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2031439
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Sure, why not 100k tons?

    Shall we dispense with rumor and stick to confirmed facts as much as we can, pls.?

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -IV #2031507
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Daring with Phalanx

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/grant359/5870027919/

    Many thanks to Dan Grant

    Yummie. Makes you wonder if it would be worthwhile to come up with some sort of RCS-reducing cover/shielding for the R2D2-lookalike.

    in reply to: First trials of F-35B on USS Wasp! #2031599
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Thx. Thought it could have something to do with airflow into the fan duct and generating lift. F35B looks odd gathering speed and taking off with this big air-brake like thing stuck up there.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2031600
    Wanshan
    Participant

    http://militaryrussia.ru/i/284/338/QzVVM.jpg
    http://militaryrussia.ru/i/284/338/OAssO.jpg
    http://militaryrussia.ru/i/284/338/SOaww.jpg

    While not exactly showing the entire covered up area, I think these pics are the closest we have.

    All those show is an additional row of tubecovers imho.

    in reply to: First trials of F-35B on USS Wasp! #2031671
    Wanshan
    Participant

    When/why was a single piece rear-hinged lift fan door introduced? (initial info indicated left and right opening split doors, just like the aux vent right behind the main lift vent.)

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -IV #2031702
    Wanshan
    Participant

    I have to say I was rather surprised that some 6 years after Sea Wolf 2 was cleared for use that they are still installing Block 2 Sea Wolf to Type 23’s, you would have thought that all of the ships would have been upgraded by now, especially as they plan to phase out Sea Wolf from 2016 and BAE’s through life contract only runs to 2017.

    Also am I the only person who was thrown by the comment on being able to track a target 20 miles away and thinking for minute that it could not be right as Sea Wolf only has a range of around 6.5 miles, until I twigged that maximum tracking range is bound to be different to the maximum range of the missile!

    REPEAT: Sea Wolf Mid Life Update = the associated Type 911 tracker is being upgraded by the addition of an infra-red camera, enhanced tracking software and new operator’s consoles

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -IV #2031771
    Wanshan
    Participant

    That can’t be right, surely?

    Key work to be undertaken includes extensive improvements to the venting system providing even distribution of fresh air, which will significantly improve habitability for the crew on board. The Defence Information Infrastructure (Future) (DII(F)), to provide an information sharing and collaborative working capability across the Armed Forces and MoD, is also to be installed, involving extensive installation of power and data cables throughout the ship. A number of upgrades are also being undertaken to key weapon and communications systems, among them the DNA(2) Command System (which requires the linking of every weapons system onboard and involves a large set to work package); upgrades to 30mm Automatic Small Calibre Guns; and the SeaWolf Mid Life Update (SWMLU) which will provide an enhanced capability to the existing system to counter an evolving anti-ship missile threat.

    http://rpdefense.over-blog.com/article-babcock-to-upgrade-hms-richmond-86599801.html

    Block 2 Sea WolfBlock 2 Sea Wolf is a replenishment upgrade to the existing stocks of Sea Wolf missiles. Block 2 missiles have replaced all Sea Wolf missiles, both on Type 22 and Type 23 frigates, as part of normal ammunition replenishment operations. In a parallel programme (Sea Wolf Mid Life Update) the associated Type 911 tracker is being upgraded by the addition of an infra-red camera, enhanced tracking software and new operator’s consoles.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_Wolf_(missile)

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -IV #2031778
    Wanshan
    Participant

    British designed & built, so FL (a US designation) is foreign to both builder & operator. And even if the British builders called it a light frigate, that doesn’t mean Iran, or any other operator, has to use the same designation.

    Indeed, the Iranians used DE (destroyer escort), the USN equivalent of the RN frigate.

Viewing 15 posts - 556 through 570 (of 3,544 total)