dark light

Wanshan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,366 through 1,380 (of 3,544 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Navies news from around the world -II #2005601
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Hangar capacity does not equal air group size. Aircraft are only taken down to the hangar for maintenance, normally between sorties they stay parked on deck, so only a percentage of the air group needs to be accomodated in the hangar. Aircraft are also only moved between hangar and flight deck in an unfuelled and unarmed condition, so Maximum takeoff weight should not be used when measuring lift capacity. F-35Bs can be moved on the lifts of an Invincible class CVS for example, which have a capacity of 18.5tonnes. whilst this is less than MTOW, it is more than empty weight, and the aircrafts dimensions allow it to fit on the lifts as well. A ship the size of Cavour should have no difficulty in operating an air group of up to twenty F-35Bs PLUS a sqn of Helos (6 ASW Merlins and three AEW Merlins), though this would be a war load. In peacetime about twelve Lightnings and nine Merlins would be normal.

    Just telling you what I’m finding out there.

    Note http://www.marina.difesa.it/unita/portaerei.asp appears to be an official Italian government defence website.

    In addition

    Aircraft carrier function
    The vessel is equipped with a flight deck suitable both for operations with helicopters and with short launch, vertical take-off fighter planes. It has a hangar / garage of approximately 2,500m² which can also accommodate wheeled and tracked land vehicles.

    The ship can support eight VTOL (vertical take-off and landing) aircraft such as AV-8B Harrier or F-35 joint strike fighter VTOL variant, or 12 helicopters, such as the EH101, NH 90 or SH-3D, or a mix of platforms.

    http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/num/

    Alterenatively, however

    Airplanes 8 AV-8B Harrier and JSF, 12 helicopters [EH101, AB212, NH 90, SH3D]

    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/europe/num-specs.htm

    Further, I also found this:

    Air group: The ship hasn’t assigned a fixed air group but is fixed according to the mission, will be a mix of 20-24 short takeoff vertical landingHarrier AV-8B plus 2 (F35B when available) and helicopters EH-101 (including Mk.112 AEW/HEW, Mk.110 ASW/ASV, Mk.410 TTH/utility e Mk.413 ASH), NH-90 NFH or TTH and SH3D

    Flight-deck: is long 232,6 m and width 34,5 m (surface 6.800+ m2). It has a runway for takeoff short long 183,0 m for 14,2 m, ski-jump with 12° of elevation, a parking area (starboard side) to 10/12 aircraft, 6 spot for helicopters type EH-101 plus a dedicated spot for SAR missions to bow.

    Hangar: is long 134,2 m, width 21,0 m e high 7,2 m (8,5 max.). It is connected to the flight deck with 2 elevators from 30 tons of which aft an “deck-edge” after the island size 15 m to 14 m, the second forward internal long 21.6 m for 14 m. There are also 2 elevators from 15 tons for ammunition and 2 service elevators from 7 tons.

    Cavour with 12 F35B and 8 EH 101, expected typical air group

    http://digilander.libero.it/en_mezzi_militari/html/en_cavour2.html

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -II #2005613
    Wanshan
    Participant

    8 f-35 or 12 helis? i’m pretty sure that cavour can handle more than 8 f-35 OR 12 helis.

    L’hangar è dimensionato per accogliere fino a 12 elicotteri oppure, in alternativa, 8 aerei.

    L’hangar potrà essere impiegato, parzialmente o totalmente, per il trasporto di mezzi ruotati o cingolati.

    L’hangar può ospitare in alternativa o contemporaneamente aeromobili e veicoli terrestri, separando se necessario le aree di lavoro e di parcheggio con cortine taglia-fuoco.

    La composizione di mezzi aerei e terrestri trasportati e delle componenti Comando Complesso, Truppe e Volo può essere comunque distribuita fino al totale utilizzo degli spazi disponibili.

    Parcheggio aeromobili: 12 Elicotteri EH-101 oppure 8 AV-8B / Joint Strike Fighter

    http://www.marina.difesa.it/unita/portaerei.asp

    It’s what the hangar accommodates. And that hanger may also be allocated to non-aviation uses depending on role (e.g. vehicle deck)

    in reply to: Pakistan Navy #2006000
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Looks like PN is getting a fully armed ship then…

    Not necessarily: USN ships sail without functional Mk13 launcher and STIR. Hence lack ability to launch Harpoon and Standard missile, and lack ability to guide SM1 at longer range (WM 25 can perform illumination closer in)

    in reply to: Guess the Ship, it's back #2006004
    Wanshan
    Participant

    ok, so the second (e/o) tracker is a lirod-8. i’ve tried to figure this out but failed.

    Yep, that’s correct. Details on the upgrade carried out in 1988 here.

    in reply to: Guess the Ship, it's back #2006080
    Wanshan
    Participant

    I’m putting you guys out of your misery.

    The last pic is the (ex-Dutch) cruiser Almirante Grau, of the Peruvian navy.

    in reply to: Pakistan Navy #2006084
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Sources in Pakistan Navy told DawnNews that the 30 year old frigate, USS McInerney, was put on the US Navy’s inactivation list September last year. It will fly the Pakistani flag after retirement in September this year.

    She started her final 6 month tour in October IIRC, so if currently still operational in USN.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -II #2006088
    Wanshan
    Participant

    😀 2,35 + 1,2….

    3,55 billion $ for the refit of a 1968-1971′ design era aircraft carrier + airwing

    In the early 2000’s, the italian paid 1,8 billion € (+/- 2,1 billion $) for the highly modern “conte di cavour” design 😀
    :dev2:

    Of course, Cavour is only 27,100t fld (as compared to 45,000 tons fld for a Kiev class ship), and can’t operate fixed wing aircraft (whereas the modified Gorshkov can).

    Plus you can think about which airwing would be more effective: 16 Mig29K+ 10 Ka-31 Helix versus 8 VTOL aircraft (AV-8B Harrier or in future F-35B joint strike fighter) or 12 helicopters (EH101, NH 90) or a mix.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2006092
    Wanshan
    Participant

    [“This leads me to say a word about the Mistral. This is a command ship, a helicopter carrier, that we will build for the Russians without any military equipment. (Emphasis added—Ed.)
    http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articles-view/release/3/112801/france%2C-russia-open-talks-on-mistral-lhd-ships.html

    Depend of course what you consider military equipment. Does this just refer to any armaments? Or other items as well? Is a command system or an extensive communication suite military equipment? If not, does it nonetheless have usefull military uses? Exceedingly vague statement.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -II #2006173
    Wanshan
    Participant

    I think I ought to point out a couple of things here.

    The ro-ro ramp can’t be used for amphibious assault. It needs a quay for unloading.

    Nor can the very small SRC90E be used for amphibious assault from Absalon. She carries two of them, each capable of carrying 10 soldiers. 20 soldiers – with no vehicles – is a raid, not an amphibious assault.
    http://www.storebro.se/Nav.aspx?pageid=79

    You’ld think she’s not intended for amphib assault then, wouldn’t you….. Or, as you may recall, these ships were referred to by the Danes as ‘flexible support ships’ and now are referred to “command and support ship” / Kommandostøtteskib
    (that doesn’t include ‘assault’ or ‘amphib’, does it?)
    .

    in reply to: Guess the Ship, it's back #2006177
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Hi wanshan

    I have spent the last 20 minutes trying to find that picture of shefield/williams. I guess thats a new mount where the forward sea wolf mount was but the torpedo tubes are in the wrong place. Help! 🙁

    This pic help you any?

    ok folks, just 1 piccy left now … takers?

    in reply to: Guess the Ship, it's back #2006229
    Wanshan
    Participant

    #2 is the Chilean Type 22 frigate Almirante Williams.

    Congratulations! Smart refit, using equipment from retired vessels. Definitely better that what the Rumanians have done so far with their Type 22s

    http://naval.mforos.com/683152/6520730-fragata-almirante-williams/?pag=3

    in reply to: Guess the Ship, it's back #2006271
    Wanshan
    Participant

    ok i’ll try the twin fortys:

    5) meko 140 (espora class)
    6) drummond class
    7) daring class destroyer (peru)
    8) aligator class (lst, capana/venezuela)

    Smmmmmokin’!!! :diablo:

    http://www.taringa.net/posts/imagenes/4473045/imagenes-del-buque-ARA-(P-46)-_Equot%3BG%C3%B3mez-Roca_Equot%3B-.html
    http://base.mforos.com/906260/4867318-fragatas-meko-360/

    Minor detail: Capana class LST appears South Korea built for Venezuela (that is, it’s a Kojoonbong (=Alligator) class ship, not a russian Project 1171 ‘Tapir’ class, NATO-coded Alligator class ship) though the bow is different from the SK vessels and looks more like the original US LST Mk2 (LST-542 class)
    http://fdra.superforos.com/viewtopic.php?t=196&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=10

    The Daring class saw service with the RN from the early 1950s to the early 1970s, and with the RAN from the late 1950s to the late 1970s. The British Darings were all decommissioned as obsolete during the early 1970s. Two of these, Diana and Decoy, were sold to the Peruvian Navy and renamed BAP Palacios and BAP Ferré respectively. These two ships were modernised, with Palacios serving until 1993, and Ferré decommissioning in 2007.
    http://fdra.superforos.com/viewtopic.php?t=195&start=0&sid=b9409560cf2b41bf65159977387e5911

    http://maquina-de-combate.com/fotos_y_videos/albums/Buques-en-la-Historia-del-Peru/fuerza_bap_ferre.jpg
    (almost Sovremenny-like bowline)

    in reply to: Guess the Ship, it's back #2006294
    Wanshan
    Participant

    the millenium gun is not from the absalon but from the guaicamacuto class patrol craft.

    but imho the absalon is also there (picture 3)

    And we have a winner! Absolon and Guaicamacuto.
    Nicely spotted (was hoping to get folks to confuse the two)

    in reply to: Guess the Ship, it's back #2006299
    Wanshan
    Participant

    The Fourth is a millenium turret, probably from a danish “absalon” ?
    Some others are twin 40mm gun, probably south korean corvettes/frigates…

    Correct on the gun systems but what about them ships?

    in reply to: Guess the Ship, it's back #2006309
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Here’s a new set for y’all to play with.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,366 through 1,380 (of 3,544 total)