Loved the Ju-88 special effects, looking more like Savoia Marchetti’s.

I will do that but the forum usually know better.

And magnesium was lighter.

I have been a reader since (ironically) the issue reporting on the 72 Spitfires extant in the UK (at the time, 1982 IIRC). Mostly because FP was very much into the aviation archa…… (well that name is also not to be mentioned here) at the time. Which made me join a recovery group etc. But since Ken Delve became editor the quality went downhill. FP still keeps the opinion alive that only Spitfires and Lancasters (and later Vulcans) mattered and the rest were less important. Nowadays I buy the magazine as a force of habit, while I have a subscription for Aeroplane which I enjoy very much.

But speaking of Spitfires, the same thing is happening here as well. When something on the aircraft type beginning with S is posted here you can expect very soon to read negative posts about it. Which I find a very negative turn of events and downgrades this forum. Perhaps more people should post more about other types, which is absolutely welcome. I don’t care which type is posted on, I like em all (except Vulcans).:D
Cees

Looking at the nice pic I think about the RAF Museums Ventura that has been sitting in deep storage since the eighties. The Lockheed twin family could do with some welldeserved limelight. Good job on the Hudson.