dark light

Bager1968

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 3,360 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: P-61 opinions #887576
    Bager1968
    Participant

    The final two air kills of WW2 were achieved by a Consolidated B32 Dominator on the 18th August 1945. The P61 kills came on the 14/15th August 1945.

    .

    Technically the B-32 kills were the first “post-WW2” kills, as Japan surrendered on 15 August 1945.

    While the signing of the surrender documents did not take place until 2 September 1945, 15 August (in Japan – 14 August in the US) is the accepted “end of WW2”.

    In comparison, note that the accepted end of WW1 was 11 November 1918 – but there was still a formal state of war between the two sides for another seven months, until the signing of the Treaty of Versailles with Germany on 28 June 1919.

    Just saying…

    in reply to: Robert Watson-Watt – #887589
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Sir Watson-Watt was fined for speeding by the police using a radar ‘gun’.
    He wittily penned this little piece:

    Pity Sir Robert Watson-Watt,
    strange target of this radar plot
    And thus, with others I can mention,
    the victim of his own invention.
    His magical all-seeing eye
    enabled cloud-bound planes to fly
    but now by some ironic twist
    it spots the speeding motorist
    and bites, no doubt with legal wit,
    the hand that once created it.

    Bager1968
    Participant

    For one guy to fly it.

    Is he a qualified flight instructor so that more can be trained in case he gets sick/quits/dies?

    in reply to: Japan's stealth plane #2228074
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Looks like a 2 -seater to me.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]231408[/ATTACH]

    All available photos show only one ejection-seat warning triangle below the canopy on each side – meaning that only one seat is fitted.

    in reply to: Possible RAF UXO #892786
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Several sources I have (just) looked up confirm that shrapnel can refer both to specific contents of a shell or bomb, and fragments of the case.

    Moggy

    Depending on whether the use is by the general public or by someone speaking about ordnance in an accurate technical manner.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2014 #2228552
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Perhaps they were spooked by the current F-35 (PW F135) issues – which are so worrying because of the ill-advised decision a few years ago to drop the mostly-developed “F-35 alternative engine” (GE/RR F136)?

    Bager1968
    Participant

    When is it moving to South Africa? I thought the intention was to operate it in Australia.

    He may well mean South Australia.

    Adrian

    South Australia (abbreviated as SA) is a state in the southern central part of Australia. It covers some of the most arid parts of the continent.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]231353[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: USN UCLASS FLYOFF #2229758
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Boy, Boyd is loosing more and more of his mind.

    I suppose the USN was trying to sabotage the X-47B as well, right? After all, the USN sent exactly the same tail-hook/wire information to Northrop-Grumman for that program, and they also had to redesign their tailhook after early tests.

    As for the USN somehow “sabotaging the F-111” – they first asked Grumman to begin work on an alternate design after it had already become obvious that there were serious problems with the shipboard version of the F-111.

    Boyd has always been “off” on some of his ideas (like his obsession with not bothering with any BVF combat capability, his ideal fighter is one with only short-range radar and IR missiles and guns and no bombing capability whatsoever) – this shouldn’t surprise me.

    in reply to: Italian Tornados collide. #2231052
    Bager1968
    Participant

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-28866291

    Two bodies have been found after Italian Tornado fighter jets collided and crashed during training over eastern Italy, Italian media say.

    It is thought the bodies are of a man and a woman, Ansa news agency reports.

    Each plane had a pilot and a navigator and the fate of the other two crew members is still unknown; it is hoped that they might have ejected to safety.

    Italian authorities have identified the aircrews as Capt. Alessandro Dotto and Capt. Giuseppe Palminteri, Capt. Mariangela Valentini and Capt. Paolo Piero Franzese.

    in reply to: US led coalition against IS #2231055
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Excellent. So now the strategy is to drop a PGM on every single useable truck in Iraq (and even Syria so that IS can’t smuggle them over the border).
    Pretty much the dumbest plan I have heard in years. 😉 But go on… if you feel rich 😉

    Even with your mental defects you have to realize that ISIL/ISIS DOES NOT CONTROL ALL OF IRAQ OR SYRIA, and therefore your reply above is a bunch of bull****.

    They control the least-populated areas of those countries, and they definitely have limited numbers of vehicles even counting their assets in Syria.

    But feel free to continue your hysterical assertions – they just show how desperately you “need” to claim the US is about to collapse from military overspending – which just shows how foolish you are.

    in reply to: US led coalition against IS #2231432
    Bager1968
    Participant

    I know that.

    I also know that most vehicles that used to be in the areas of Iraq that ISIL/ISIS has taken over were used to carry refugees out of those areas before either the people or the vehicles could be captured.

    There is a very limited supply of vehicles left, there are no manufacturing plants there, and no one is importing vehicles for ISIL/ISIS – therefore as the US, Iragi/Iranian, and other air forces destroy them, they cannot be replaced – while the US can easily afford to build & buy tens of thousands more “$250,000 PGMs”!

    in reply to: US led coalition against IS #2231436
    Bager1968
    Participant

    I see – they can just pray and Allah will drop a new one from the clouds.

    Bager1968
    Participant

    Oh & a 500 kg bomb would be a British 1000 pounder.

    454.545454… kg, actually.

    in reply to: US led coalition against IS #2231856
    Bager1968
    Participant

    When I consider the cost to take out one technical in the first video (deploying an F-16, plus almost a quarter million for the PGM), I am not sure if that’s sustainable effort..

    ?

    The world’s largest economy can afford a few PGMS a lot more than a group which has no way of replacing its lost “technicals” outside of capturing more – something it hasn’t done for a while.

    in reply to: F-18 stealth weapons pod ( EWP ) #2232346
    Bager1968
    Participant

    i was compared each F-35’s weapon bay with 1 EWP
    1 weapon bay can only hold 2 aim-120 , or 1 aim-120 and 4 SDB while 1 EWP pod can hold 4 aim-120 or 2 aim-120 and 6 SDB , the question is why the EWP pod is quite the same size as F-35 weapon bay but can hold alot more weapon

    As he said – FOR NOW!

    LM has openly stated that 2xAIM-120 per bay is just what the USAF/USN/USMC contracted for, and that an upgrade to 4xAIM-120 and 2xAIM-9X per bay is just a matter of paying for integration and clearance trials, having been “designed in” when the bay shapes were designed.

    2xAIM-120 + 2xAIM-9X + 2×1,000lb JDAM per bay is also on LM’s “can do” list.

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 3,360 total)