dark light

Bager1968

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,626 through 2,640 (of 3,360 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Todays aircraft quiz… #1254828
    Bager1968
    Participant

    My guess also… unless it is a gasket (o-ring), or other hydraulic fitting or such.

    in reply to: Fairey ER.103 fighters #1254829
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Well, thanks to the link, I finally have a clue what you are talking about.

    Interesting… but probably a bit large* for anything but a missile-fighter/strike bomber… similar to the later F-111.

    * only 5 feet longer than the Mirage III, but 10 feet 8 inches greater wingspan (37’7″ vs 26’11”), which matches that of the Mirage IV. This would adversely affect roll rate, and thus slow its ability to initiate/terminate turns… but should improve sustained turn rate.

    in reply to: Engine for LCA? #2538722
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Kick your AF for incompetence. The AF has to force the own aviation industry to seek foreign help in time and to accept an interim engine. If you need another billion for that, you have to cut the number of fighters accordingly.

    Ummm… I was under the impression that it was the Indian National Government, NOT industry, that was insisting on the “100% home-designed/built” aspect.

    Last I heard, the Indian National Government still controlled (and gave orders to) the Indian Air Force!

    Have you somehow heard differently?

    in reply to: Rafales for Lybia #2538723
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Uh… guys…

    The “report on CNBC this morning” was on a post dated 4 FEBRUARY 2007!!

    Suddenly, having heard NOTHING for the 10 months since that post, a news report of a diplomatic visit triggers an assumption by both the press and you guys that this is to sign a deal… with NO other indications from Dassault or either government?

    I would question whether comments by one of Quaddafi’s sons constitutes a statement from the Lybian Government.

    Note the tone Reuters and La Tribune take… “Could sell” Rafales… “Lybia is seeking Rafales and Tigers”!

    Nothing about this being an actual, confirmed, ready-to-be-signed deal.

    PARIS, Dec 5 (Reuters) – France could sell between 10 and 14 “Rafale” combat aircraft to Libya during a state visit to Paris by Muammar Gaddafi, La Tribune newspaper reported on Wednesday.
    Dassault Aviation which builds the Rafale, declined to comment on the report. The office of French President Nicolas Sarkozy also declined to comment. Gaddafi is due to visit France for five days from Dec. 10, La Tribune said. It will be his first visit in more than 30 years.
    The newspaper said Libya was seeking the Rafale for its special forces and was also seeking to buy between eight and 12 “Tiger” helicopters, made by EADS-subsidiary Eurocopter (EAD.PA: Quote, Profile, Research), and two naval patrol boats.
    The visit should also formalise the sale of Airbus A350 XWB and other aircraft to two Libyan airlines, it said.
    Sarkozy signed defence and nuclear energy accords during a controversial visit to Libya in July.

    -END-

    in reply to: Fairey ER.103 fighters #1255001
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Well, I just Google’d it, and got:
    “Your search for “Fairey ER.103B” returned no results.”

    So, could you explain a bit more… like: was it WW1… ‘tween wars, WW2, early jet*?

    Land or carrier… etc.

    *As the Fairey name went away in 1960 (courtesy of Wastelands), it can’t be after that… can it?

    Bager1968
    Participant

    In the mid-1980s a USAF F-15 shot down a test low-orbit satellite with a specially-modified AIM-7 Spaarrow missile, so I think it might have been capable of a reentry-phase intercept, but I have not heard of them actually doing that.

    in reply to: No Colossus, Majestic or Hermes class CVL #2042443
    Bager1968
    Participant

    I said I was guessing, ok. What I had seen on KD said she got the same catapults as the Majestics that were modified for Australia, Canada, & India.

    So, why did KD get a longer catapult than Melbourne, Bonaventure, or Vikrant?

    I have seen their photos and drawings, and theirs are definitely shorter than that on KD/25deMayo.

    Yes, Melbourne & Bonaventure were nearly finished with their modernizations when KD began hers, so maybe the extended-length version wasn’t available yet, but Vikrant was done afterwards… did the UK just not want India to have it?

    in reply to: CVF #2042627
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Actually, the ability to convert later to catapult & arresting gear is part of the design… and was one of the selling points… that the RN was buying “convertable carriers”.

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya delayed until 2011! #2042770
    Bager1968
    Participant

    To pry Indian major equipment procurals away from Russia?

    You bet!

    Probably be difficult, though… the attractiveness of Gorshkov was her physical youth… commissioned 1987, decommissioned 1996.

    10 years of service, and 8 years resting before work started.

    Kittw Hawk (still in better shape than Kennedy): commissioned 1961… 47 years of service by her planned decommissioning in the summer of 2008. Yes she received a 2½ year-long SLEP (Service Life Extension Program) overhaul from the end of 1987 to the middle of 1990, but that was only designed to add 15 years to her useful life… and that was up 2 years ago. 😉

    All the other old supercarriers have been stripped to keep Kitty and Kenny operational… and remember, although Kenny was comissioned in 1968, and served 39 years, she never got a SLEP (just a couple of lesser overhauls), and thus is in much worse condition.

    Either would require a full rebuilding/replacement of their boilers & turbines, and major work throughout to continue for the 15+ years required to justify the expense of the work.

    If, on the other hand, India wished to just lease Kitty for 5 years or so (until the first ADS comissions), much less work would be required (~ 1 year)… and a “complex overhaul” (~18-20 months) would see her through to the completion of a second ADS (if it is started by 2010)… but barely.

    If the US does a “work plus F/A-18E/F gets chosen for MRCA” deal… then the US Congress would approve… but since Indi would be unwilling to go that route again, I doubt it could be done.

    But then, they seem real happy with their experience with the “hot transfer” from the USN of the 36-year-old LPD-14 Trenton, and this would be a similar deal for a similarly-aged ship (taking into account the SLEP), and far less work would be needed, so…

    in reply to: CVF #2042774
    Bager1968
    Participant

    So much for the Rock Apes becoming Spanish, eh?

    That’ll upset the annexation-agitators a bit.

    Of course, it does make a lot of sense… in the same way as the USN “forward-basing” Kitty Hawk (and then George Washington in 2008) in Yokusoka, Japan does.

    Yes, that decision has been approved by Japan (in April, 2006)… and CV-63 will be replaced by CVN-73.

    in reply to: Vertical Support Ship #2042778
    Bager1968
    Participant

    The C11-1 installed on Coral Sea had a shuttle run of ~ 215ft and a length of ~240ft.

    The C13 on DeGualle has a shuttle run of 75m (246ft) and a length of 270ft.

    Coral Sea operated F/A-18As just fine from those C11-1s, so that would be all you need to fit.

    in reply to: No Colossus, Majestic or Hermes class CVL #2042780
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Minas Gerais and Karel Doorman were modernized and fitted with steam catapults in Holland… the others were all done in Britain.

    Perhaps the Dutch were willing to look outside the “normal supplier” and consider another option.

    The fact that Karel Doorman was fitted with a new, longer BS catapult during her second modernization (becoming 25deMayo), indicates that the Argentines felt the MS cat was underpowered for future aircraft?

    I am guessing that KD was fitted with an MS cat also… but since she was modernized before MG, maybe not?

    in reply to: Otis Redding crash. #1258875
    Bager1968
    Participant

    And one who didn’t… but for the intervention of a virus.
    And a less-famous one who didn’t due to the flip of a coin.

    Waylon Jennings.
    He had been touring with Buddy Holly, Richie Valens (Ricardo Valenzuela), “The Big Bopper” (J.P. Richardson), and Tommy Allsup (Waylon & Tommy were backup musicians).

    They were to travel on their bus, but it had developed problems with its heater. Disgusted with the cold bus, and because Richardson had developed a fever, they chartered a single-engined aircraft… a Beechcraft Bonanza. There wasn’t room for everyone, and Waylon told Richardson “go ahead, I’ll ride the bus”.

    Allsup and Valens flipped a coin for the remaining seat, and Valens “won”.

    Waylon & Allsup, thinking they had got the worse deal, got on the bus, along with Dion and the Belmonts.

    Shortly after takeoff into a snowstorm, the Beech crashed, killing all aboard.

    Many know of Waylon Jennings, but Allsup became a producer, working with many big names in music.

    in reply to: CVF #2042864
    Bager1968
    Participant

    The last I heard, the UK MOD has initiated a formal replacement for the AEW Sea Kings, and the language strongly implies (but does not state outright) that they want it to be EH101.

    in reply to: Engine for LCA? #2541731
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Well, if it needs some aerodynamic redesign… maybe a little fuselage work too?

    Viola… LCAmod1/F414 😀

Viewing 15 posts - 2,626 through 2,640 (of 3,360 total)