dark light

Bager1968

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,971 through 2,985 (of 3,360 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Area 51? #1279922
    Bager1968
    Participant

    “October 1978

    Lockheed conducted the first test of its stealth cruise missile, code-named SENIOR PROM. Six prototypes were built. They somewhat resembled a subscale, unmanned version of the HAVE BLUE. The demonstrator models were launched from a DC-130 from the 6514th Test Squadron from Hill AFB, Utah. The SENIOR PROM test articles and launch aircraft were housed in Hangar 17 at Area 51.”

    That is very interesting, as my oldest brother was at that time employed by Kentron International… and was working at Hill Air Force Base performing data processing for the ALCM (Air Launched Cruise Missile) tests being performed at that time… the fly-off for the USAF cruise missile contract between the Boeing AGM-86 and the General Dynamics AGM-109 (a modified version of the BGM-109 being developed for the USN’s sea-launched cruise missile (SLCM) program).

    The USAF contract was awarded to Boeing in 1980, and both the USAF AGM-86 and USN BGM-109 were ordered to use the Williams F107 turbofan of the AGM-86 and the Terrain Contour Matching – TERCOM – system of the BGM-109.

    I wonder if any of the data they handled was actually for SENIOR PROM?

    in reply to: My latest project… #1280057
    Bager1968
    Participant

    “As any one of Trenchard’s little b******s will tell you ALWAYS CHECK THE POWER SUPPLY FIRST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”

    In 1988, one of the lads in the barracks (Military Police type) was throwing a nice portable component stereo set out (the speakers, tape deck, and receiver were all separate parts, but hooked together with a carry handle).

    I (being an avionics type) asked him what was wrong with it. He said “It won’t even turn on!”, so I asked could I have it. He said sure, I took it home, removed the cover, removed the 1/2 inch of dust, replaced the 2 blown fuses, and had a great stereo for several more years… then gave it to a civvie friend who is still using it!!

    Jon H, I graduated from high school and started in University in 1980… πŸ˜€

    in reply to: The 'Whispering Death' myth. #1280065
    Bager1968
    Participant

    The first description sounds like it was an internal Beaufighter squadron nickname, the second supports the findings on the other forum that such nicknames often came from either civilians or ground troops.

    in reply to: Brazil delivers warplanes to Colombia, FARC upset #2508841
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Awww, now they have to fight even harder to carry out their communist bloodbath revolution… my heart just goes out to them, doesn’t yours?

    Maybe Brazil could give Colombia a few AMXs as well?

    in reply to: First C-17 Arrives In Australia #2508844
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Well, that fat fuselage means that you can stuff a lot of things, and nice large ones at that, inside… which is what a strategic transport is for, right?

    in reply to: Is Anyone Familiar With This?? Just Asking… #2508852
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Perhaps one way to resolve the engine-ground distance issue would be to simply fit longer out-rigger struts?

    As they retract aft, and remain outside of the wing, longer ones should fit fine, and considering the amount of flexing the wing already does before take-off is achieved they should not cause undue stress on the wing, either.

    Remember the wingtips are several feet below the wing-root when on the ground, and several feet above it when flying level with a full fuel and bomb load.

    Is the 2/4 per side equation based on losing one engine per pylon, or on losing both engines on the same pylon. If the latter, then going to a 4-engine outfit would change nothing, but if the former…

    8 x 17,000 lb thrust = 136,000 lb thrust… so you need 4 x 34,000+ lb thrust engines… the F117-PW-100 (PW2020) should do nicely, and provide a nice margin of performance improvement for 3-engine scenarios over the old 6-engine ones.

    Everything I have read here in the US is that the decision not to upgrade was purely a cost matter, the technical details were all resolved.

    Bager1968
    Participant

    “For carrier ops, you don’t need autonomous operation capability, it can be a plain radar carrier, with all the fancy stuff done on the ground,”

    swerve, that is a totally incorrect view of how a carrier uses its AEW&C aircraft… a major reason for having autonomous capability is so the carrier can turn off its own radar, and radios, in order to make itself harder for the enemy to find. The aircraft (orbiting away from, but within detection range of, the carrier) then takes over all flight-direction duties… including vectoring returning aircraft to within visual range of the carrier. Then, and only then, does the carrier communicate with the returning aircraft using a very low-powered (and short-ranged) radio.

    If the aircraft has to data-link to the carrier for information processing and/or operational control, then the carrier is broadcasting its location to anyone with an RDF set.

    in reply to: First C-17 Arrives In Australia #2509433
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Well, with NATO making noises about buying some C-17s, maybe not quite so soon… (crosses fingers). πŸ˜€

    in reply to: First C-17 Arrives In Australia #2509615
    Bager1968
    Participant

    I recently got an e-mail from (I believe) the site host saying: “Scattered Intelligence Agency is now closed”… now what?

    in reply to: The XB-70 #1282091
    Bager1968
    Participant

    bmp

    in reply to: The XB-70 #1282640
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Mach 3 first reached by the XB-70 on October 14, 1965 in the first prototype (17th flight), which was later limited to 2.5? due to skin separation problems on that flight.

    The second prototype was built to a higher standard, and was not restricted. It also reached Mach 3 on its 17th flight, but had no skin problems.

    The Mach 3 for 33 minutes flight was on May 19th, 1966 (39th flight).

    The crash of #2 was on June 8, 1966 on its 46th flight.

    #1 flew 82 flights (the last to the Air Force Museum at Wright Field, in Dayton, Ohio), 33 of them after the loss of #2.

    Info from:
    http://www.labiker.org/xb70.html

    edit
    Therefore, Sea Vixen, there were 49 flights of #1 and 45 flights of #2 before the crash… it was on the 95th combined flight.
    I tried to get this on right away, but the board had gone down

    in reply to: Blackjack's All-Moving Fin #2509843
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Horizontal tail surfaces, yes… but all-moving vertical surfaces are much less common.

    in reply to: Is Anyone Familiar With This?? Just Asking… #2509860
    Bager1968
    Participant

    “fuels not subject to the whims of Islamic radicals”

    Or newly re-elected South American radicals.

    Did you know that the US still imports more oil (and has done so for over 30 years) from Venezuela than any other single country?

    I guess the rantings Hugo Chavez was doing a year or so ago about the US “stealing Venezuela’s future by taking all of its oil” were just political window-dressing, since he is still selling us all the oil we want to buy from him.

    in reply to: Military Jet Crashes Near U.S. Base #2509871
    Bager1968
    Participant

    ASSOCIATED PRESS
    4:09 p.m. December 1, 2006

    SAN DIEGO – A pilot who safely ejected from an F-18 Hornet fighter jet moments before it crashed at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar was identified Friday by military officials.

    Capt. Jonathan C. Ashmore, 27, of Oakland, Mich., ejected Thursday about three miles from the Marine base airfield, according to Miramar spokesman Maj. Jason Johnston. He was on a final approach for landing at the base.
    Johnston said Ashmore was a β€œpilot under instruction,” which means he had completed flight school but was still learning how to operate the F-18.
    Ashmore was the sole occupant of the two-seat plane. He was found near the wreckage of the jet, which crashed in an unpopulated, hilly area of the base.

    Ashmore sustained only minor injuries.

    The experience of ejecting from a fighter jet is β€œvery traumatic,” Johnston said.
    Miramar, well known for its role in the movie β€œTop Gun,” is home to some 10,000 Marines. It was operated by the U.S. Navy until 1996.
    The cause of the crash was still under investigation.

    Bager1968
    Participant

    A lot of the later “Jumbo-ization projects (on the “newer” [1950s] tankers and cargo ships with all of the engine, control, and crew spaces aft) actually involved simply cutting off the entire cargo section & bow, and scrapping that… and building a completely new, larger forward section onto the old stern section.

    After all, that was where all of the expensive items were… the forward 2/3-3/4 was just steel and air, and you know the saying…

Viewing 15 posts - 2,971 through 2,985 (of 3,360 total)