Much like Cobra Ball and Rivet Joint are attached to the RC-135S and RC-135V/W? (never have figured out the diff. between the W and V)
This site might give you an idea (scroll down to the table of individual aircraft info).
The RC-135V are upgraded/converted RC-135C aircraft (originally built as RC-135B), and the RC-135W are upgraded/converted RC-135M/RC-135U/C-135B aircraft (the -M were converted from C-135Bs and the -U was one of 3 converted from RC-135Cs, the other 2 are still in -U configuration).
Also, the wiki article gives a very simplistic overview of what each variant was intended for.
As for mission names… the sole RC-135T Rivet Dandy operated under the Burning Candy operational order.
BC was the name for gathering signals intelligence over the Gulf of Tonkin and Laos (later re-named Combat Apple).
Nice… Russia couldn’t get her from Ukraine, so they get the Chinese to buy her as a proxy.
As part of the deal China gets technical info on the Su-33 (and other Soviet/Russian carrier-based aircraft designs) and a full in-depth exam of Varyag, as well as tech help in completing her, with her being returned to Russia after completion.
This helps China develop their own carrier design, as well as detailed info on carrier-capable aircraft, and Russia saves development and construction costs.
A neat conspiracy theory, but highly unlikely.
Looks F-84’ish? wings look too straight for an 86….
P’rhaps the father of the F-86*… FJ-1 Fury (first flight 1946):
http://www.aviastar.org/air/usa/na_fj.php
A North American FJ-1 Fury of Fighting Squadron VF-5A Screaming Eagles on the aircraft carrier USS Boxer (CV-21) in March 1948.![]()
Full-sized pic link: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/35/FJ-1_VF-5A_CV-21_Mar48_NAN3-63.jpg
* the story of the metamorphosis from the straight wing & tail FJ-1 to the F-86 can be found here:
joebaugher.com usaf fighters xp86
Strange that no-one commented on the fantastic job Nobuo Harada is doing in japan in completly building a forward fuselage of a Betty to complete the original restored tail section he already had.
As per Sopwith’s comment… its hard to comment on something that one does not know is happening.
Now that we know a Betty job is under work, we can search the internet to try to find out info about it… unless you feel generous enough to give us a link to where you got your info.
The U.S. Air Force has grounded its fleet of F-22 Raptors, citing concerns over the aircraft’s oxygen system.
See link for full story
http://www.stripes.com/news/air-force/air-force-grounds-f-22-raptors-1.142844
Agricultural crops grown and used for fuel oil production. As being trialled (used?) already.
Oh sure, they grow those here. The problem is I hear that they give more in subsidies to grow the oil than the oil is actually worth.
I reckon military aviation could well be the last user of oil as a fuel, carrying on when every other user has switched to other fuels.
snafu352 seems more informed than either of you.
Air Force jets perform first flyover using alternative fuel
“The Air Force is committed to reducing our nation’s dependence on foreign petroleum and is pursuing environmentally-friendly, domestically-produced alternative biofuel blends for our entire fleet of manned and unmanned aircraft,” said Dr. Kevin Geiss, the deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force for energy.
…..“If anyone doubts the potential of these fuels, consider Brazil,” said President Barack Obama during his March 30 remarks on U.S. energy security. “Already more than half of Brazil’s vehicles can run on biofuels. And just last week, our Air Force used an advanced biofuel blend to fly an F-22 Raptor faster than the speed the sound. In fact, the Air Force is aiming to get half of its domestic jet fuel from alternative sources by 2016.”
…..The Air Force is testing and evaluating biomass fuels derived from three different feedstocks: camelina (plant seed oil), beef tallow (animal fat) and various waste oils and greases.
To date, the service has tested and certified biofuel as a 50-percent blend with regular jet fuel in the A-10 Thunderbolt II, the F-15 Eagle, the C-17 Globemaster III and the F-22.
The Air Force has fully certified C-17s to fly on the biofuel blend and certification of the F-16 Fighting Falcon, the aircraft flown by the Air Force’s demonstration team, the Thunderbirds, is imminent, Geiss said. Fleet-wide certification is on track for completion in 2013.
The service’s long-term goal, Geiss explained, is to acquire 50 percent of all stateside fuel from domestically-produced alternative blends that are cleaner than fuel produced from conventional petroleum.
Navy Secretary Pushes for Alternative Energy Use
Release Date: 1/26/2011 2:37:00 PM
WASHINGTON, D.C. (NNS) — The secretary of the navy reached out to prominent industry leaders during a Washington, D.C., summit Jan. 25, in an effort to have them incorporate the use of alternative fuels in their push for a clean economy.
During the Clean Energy Summit, Secretary Ray Mabus began his review of the effects converting the Department of the Navy (DoN) from fossil fuels to alternative fuels will have on the economy on a basic level.
…..Mabus said the dependence on fossil fuel continued to produce bad results during the time of war by endangering Sailors and Marines charged with guarding convoys bringing energy to bases and machinery. He urged that the solution to this reliance and resulting war and loss of lives is the utilization of alternative fuels.
He relayed information about DoN flying an F/A-18 with a camelina-based biofuel and a MH-60 Seahawk helicopter on an algae-based biofuel. Mabus said substitutions such as this would reduce the need for altercation caused by limited availability.
“Neither feedstock impacts the food supply,” said Mabus. “Camelina can be planted in rotation, and algae – well, it’s grown in a pond.”
…..The use of cotton-seed by Marines in Sangi, Afghanistan, was also presented by Mabus as an example of alternative energy at its best. Through this pilot program, Mabus said Marines have reduced the amount of fossil fuel they use by 20 percent. As a consequence, Marines utilize fuel convoys less.
Politicians hide their plans to put French jets on Royal Navy carriers
Sad, delusional man.
The proposal (never an actual plan, much less an agreement or contract) to build part of the RN’s CVF in France was shot down many years ago… and yet he still thinks that part of the ships are being built in France.
He is so out of touch and misinformed that what he says cannot be taken seriously.
French BPC Dixmude is due to commission in 2012.
RegardsX
thanks for the correction. wikipedia says the ship is due to be commissioned in may of 2011, but we all know how out of date or just straight up wrong info on wikipedia can be.
Dixmunde has just started sea trials.
7+ months of trials before commissioning?
For the 3rd of class?
And what if your photos end up being the only ones still surviving… are they still “poor” or are they priceless historical artifacts?
Could a professional photo studio perhaps get them looking better?
Kinda like Me-109/Bf-109?
And here is the full 58-page NAA brochure on the F2J Super Fury proposal: http://retromechanix.com/aerospace/north-american-navalized-f-100-super-fury-proposal/
PC-9 Jet training?!
Mice put three training jets of Slovenian Air Force out of order
I just looked, and the only place the word “jet” appears in the article (or its headline) is in the last sentence:
Mice ground three Slovenian Air Force training planes
00:58 24/04/2011Mice have seriously damaged three Pilatus PC-9 training planes of the Slovenian Air Foce, a spokesman for the Slovenian armed forces Simon Korez told the POP TV.
The rodents seriously damaged wiring of the aircraft, inflicting losses of 5,000 euro (over $7,000).
The three aircraft were parked outdoors last year to clear hangar space for a governmental jet.
BELGRADE, April 24 (RIA Novosti)
The text for the pic of the mouse reads:
The rodents seriously damaged wiring of the aircraft, inflicting losses of 5,000 euro (over $7,000).
And the Fury link seems to have crashed.
{edit: and is back up.}
Thanks very much for the link.
I brought up the FJ-5 Fury last year here: Huns in the 70’s & 80’s thread in Key’s Modern Military Aircraft section
Note the link to an on-line site covering a bunch of proposed naval variants of the F-100 and F-107:
http://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2009/10/proposed-super-furies.html
So:
Buccaneer on flat tops (maybe upgraded to S2 but in all likelihood probably not)
Bucc S.2 was already in production while TSR.2 was in full roar… it was ordered by the Admiralty January 1962, and first flight of a Spey-powered Bucc was 17 May 1963 (converted S.1 test article).
Number 801 squadron brought the S.2 operational in October 1965.
TSR.2 first flight was 27 September 1964, and cancellation was 6 April 1965.
Twosader as Sea Vixen relacement? Maybe just continually upgraded Sea Vixens with (eventually) Skyflash?
If Twosader is used in RAF and/or RN then maybe we’d have a Spey-engining programme which actually worked out!
Likewise, the Phantom FG.1 was ordered while TSR.2 was in full roar… 1 July 1964, to be precise.
However, if the RN is forced to back down, then the Two-sader would actually be a good thing for the RN.
While it would only provide a 2,000lb thrust boost over the J57, it would definitely provide much better fuel economy, which would increase range, as the second seat did not reduce the fuel capacity.
Additionally, Victorious (certainly) and Hermes (possibly) might well have been able to operate a Speyed Twosader, and both Ark Royal and Eagle would have needed less modification, which could mean Ark gets her boilers & engines rebuilt during her 1967-70 modernization, and Eagle could be operating them through the 1970s as well (with either Vicky or Hermes rotating with them).
By the early 1980s, both Vicky & Hermes would be pretty well ready for the scrapyard, and the other two would not last past 1985, so a same-sized replacement to operate F/A-18s might well be ordered.
so the RN might have been able to keep “real” carrier aviation alive longer.