dark light

hopsalot

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,491 through 2,505 (of 2,738 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F35 News only thread for 2013 #2304997
    hopsalot
    Participant

    Not USMC’s F/A-18s. As for the F-16s, nothing wrong with a few hundred for air defence duty (but F-35 isn’t exactly optimised for that role) but most of them aren’t needed either. The A-10s can go without replacement also.

    Glad you have it all figured out. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: US UAVs flying with F22 escorts? #2305253
    hopsalot
    Participant

    “Escort” is almost certainly the wrong word.

    It is much more likely that there are fighters on alert in the region that could be called upon if needed. An F-XX would be able to get to any part of the Gulf in a matter of minutes if it was in a hurry.

    in reply to: F35 News only thread for 2013 #2305722
    hopsalot
    Participant

    More good news for the F-35:

    Singapore Expected To Order F-35s Soon: Source

    Singapore is in the “final stages of evaluating” the F-35 to upgrade its air force, a process U.S. sources say should turn quickly into orders for several dozen of the stealthy warplanes that have been beset by cost overruns and delivery delays.

    Singapore, a major business and shipping hub with the best-equipped military in Southeast Asia, is expected to submit a “letter of request” soon for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, said two U.S. government officials who were not authorized to speak publicly on the matter.

    The city-state could start the process as soon as this week to buy the planes built by Lockheed Martin Corp, one of the officials said. Pratt & Whitney, a unit of United Technologies Corp, makes the engine for the F-35.

    Singapore’s defence minister, Ng Eng Hen, said on Tuesday the air force “has identified the F-35 as a suitable aircraft to further modernise our fighter fleet”.

    http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/awx_03_14_2013_p0-559083.xml

    in reply to: Dumb or what? #2306219
    hopsalot
    Participant

    :rolleyes: The fact that certain Western fanboys are butthurt about this deal is not surprising in the least.
    You guys should apply for Rosoboronexport jobs, you know better than them and Sukhoi and the Russian MOD on what is a good idea to export.

    It is one thing to agree to tech transfer with a substantial deal, but a couple dozen aircraft, to a buyer that has massively ripped off Russia in the past?

    The fact that China is buying as few planes as possible, just so they can reverse engineer them like they did with the previous aircraft Russia sold them… and that Russia is willing to sell anyway says a lot.

    Wanna talk about something dumb? How about America and others exporting half their industry to China? Heard thats working out 🙂 .

    :rolleyes:

    Economic smack from Russia? lol

    China has become the world’s top manufacturing country by output, returning the country to the position it occupied in the early 19th century and ending the US’s 110-year run as the largest goods producer.

    The change is revealed in a study released on Monday by IHS Global Insight, a US-based economics consultancy, which estimates that China last year accounted for 19.8 per cent of world manufacturing output, fractionally ahead of the US with 19.4 per cent.

    http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/002fd8f0-4d96-11e0-85e4-00144feab49a.html

    Between the US and China that is ~40% of all the manufacturing on earth.

    China may have moved ahead of the US, but the US is still a manufacturing super power by any reasonable standard.

    in reply to: Dumb or what? #2306291
    hopsalot
    Participant

    Wishful thinking at its most glorius.

    You would not be related to Neville Chamberlain now would you?

    This deal really doesn’t say anything good about either of them to be honest.

    It shows that Russia is desperate enough for sales that they will sell to a regional rival, even knowing that all they intend to do is take their weapon apart and steal the technology.

    China on the other hand is still forced to import technology despite many years of efforts to steal or develop their own.

    in reply to: F-35 debate thread. #2306851
    hopsalot
    Participant

    er, they were building decoys continuously…

    they moved out of kosovo after Milosevic decided to stop the war… almost all of their ground forces were as operational as on day one

    :rolleyes:

    Surviving the war is no great feat if you accomplish it by hiding instead of fighting and lose the war…

    I really don’t get the fascination with how much of their forces the Serbs were able to hide. I imagine they could have preserved 100% of their forces, not to mention saved some lives, by just surrendering without a fight at all.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/1420000/images/_1420066_milosevic300afp.jpg

    hopsalot
    Participant

    Stop the press ! chocking news !

    Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff has again delayed choosing a provider for 36 new Air Force jets

    Read all about it
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/08/us-brazil-jets-idUSBRE9270T620130308

    Yeah, read all about it… a few posts above your own…

    in reply to: F35 News only thread for 2013 #2308706
    hopsalot
    Participant

    New GAO report coming soon:

    http://uk.news.yahoo.com/exclusive-retrofits-add-1-7-billion-cost-f-001348716–finance.html

    The GAO draft report offers the agency’s most positive outlook yet for the Pentagon’s most expensive weapons program, which has seen a spate of negative news in recent weeks, including two engine-related groundings this year.

    “Overall, the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program is now moving in the right direction after a long, expensive and arduous learning process,” GAO said. “Going forward, ensuring affordability – the ability to acquire aircraft in quantity and to sustain aircraft going over the life cycle – is of paramount concern.”

    in reply to: F35 News only thread for 2013 #2308709
    hopsalot
    Participant

    More from the above source:

    Progress in technical development

    After much work has now identified or fully developed solutions to all the known technical challenges on the plane. This includes the most talked about challenges that helmet, software development and the protection against lightning.

    – We see that progress with the helmet (pictured) is now so good that one is likely to return to a solution at the next major milestone in April, and it will then scrutinize backup solution began to work with last year. Lightning Protection has now agreed on a solution, and restrictions on flights in the storm will be repealed in 2015, while software version “2B” installed in the aircraft. This is the software the U.S. Marine Corps will be operational in 2015, and where shortly after the use of F-35 in crisp military operations if necessary. The development of software in general, where we previously saw a backlog is now collected, and the development of Block 2B software is now on track to be installed in 2015. This shows that the measures taken just months back, now performing well, says Klever.

    in reply to: F35 News only thread for 2013 #2308735
    hopsalot
    Participant

    Good news on costs/concurrency costs:

    Norwegian:
    http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/fd/tema/kampfly-til-forsvaret/–det-gar-sakte-men-sikkert-fremover.html?id=715294

    Google Translate:
    http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.regjeringen.no%2Fnb%2Fdep%2Ffd%2Ftema%2Fkampfly-til-forsvaret%2F–det-gar-sakte-men-sikkert-fremover.html%3Fid%3D715294

    Lower costs than expected and much lower estimates of future payments were among the good news is the new program director of the international F-35 program had in the bag when he held on Thursday 21 February held an orientation for partner during a summit in the United States. Lieutenant General Christopher Bogdan could include telling that cost estimates related to the so-called concurrency changes has been reduced by 30%, and that the actual cost so far has been far below even this level.

    – I think there were many of those who have accepted early production aircraft breathed a sigh of relief when they saw those numbers, said Brigadier Morten Klever Deputy Chairman of the Norwegian fighter program and represented Norway in the meeting.

    – This shows that concurrency changes, ie the need to go back and make changes in aircraft that are already built when the test program reveals deficiencies, has been shown to cost much less than first feared. The program has therefore revised down estimates for how much you should expect to spend on such changes in the future with 30%, and the actual costs incurred for such changes so far suggests that they may be even lower, explains Klever.

    – This is also very positive for Norway when it suggests that the need for such changes in the Norwegian aircraft will be very small, and perhaps even less than we have taken into account. It also suggests that the structure of the plane is not as immature as many critics claim.

    The unit price is reduced

    Lieutenant Bogdan also said that the cost of each aircraft has been reduced much faster than the current plan had assumed.

    – Right now is the cost of F-35 is actually below where they had hoped to be at this time, so it’s probably an indication that the trend is moving in the right direction. From the production line 6 (LRIP 6) will also aircraft ordered under the fixed-price contracts that we not risk getting any overruns in contract on the Norwegian aircraft, said Klever.

    Norwegian aircraft will be delivered from the production line 7 (LRIP 7) and will be covered by such fixed-price contracts.

    http://www.regjeringen.no/imgpreviews/00/00/03/34/33494_full.jpg

    http://www.regjeringen.no/imgpreviews/00/00/03/34/33495_full.jpg

    http://www.regjeringen.no/imgpreviews/00/00/03/34/33496_full.jpg

    in reply to: F35 News only thread for 2013 #2309210
    hopsalot
    Participant

    As the envelope expands…They will be testing more testpoints (11,000 compared to 8000 for last year) and their will be a visibile increase in testing pace…

    Just like i mentioned in the DEBATE threat, this is what the program has to deal with. Their are a gazillion stories all which appear as CLONES , and all that are based on the same report (POGO) and the material it sites. This is not NEW news, but just a new article based on the same report. These reports also do not provide a balanced commentary, specifying whether such failures and glitches are common or uncommon for a weapons system that is 2-5 years from IOC status. A comparison to where similar (fighter) systems were at this stage of testing would have been preferable. There are is one report (i posted in the debate thread) that has a title that goes ” F-35 wont stand a chance in combat”… Such a report fails to mention that NOT A SINGLE fighter ever developed in the US , would not have stood any CHANCE IN COMBAT 3-5 years before IOC. No aircraft during testing is expected fight and acheive actual combat, that will only happen after IOC and more preferably after full operational declaration.

    Yes, there is an echo-chamber effect, but what is worse is that it only applies to bad news. A report will mention a glitch, and that report will be cited 100 times by various lazy journalists who don’t fully understand what is going on. When the glitch is fixed… no news, certainly not dozens of redundant articles saying how it has been fixed.

    In the end all people hear is the negative.

    I almost wish LM could take the approach used by China/Russia. Just say almost nothing. Leave people to wonder what happened when flight testing stops for weeks at a time, or why structural reinforcements appear on the test aircraft.

    They could also simply never release the details of the budget or schedule, making it hard to tell when things have slipped or gone over budget, etc etc.

    in reply to: F35 News only thread for 2013 #2309260
    hopsalot
    Participant

    Nellis pilots take first step toward F-35 operational testing

    http://www.eglin.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123339039

    F-35’s are coming off the production line at a rate of about 3 per month this year, that combined with the release of newer software blocks should make this an interesting year.

    in reply to: F-35 debate thread. #2309531
    hopsalot
    Participant

    Only Americans use this term. Not that your loyalties weren’t obvious before. :rolleyes:

    Let me help you out then:

    soph·o·mor·ic
    [sof-uh-mawr-ik, -mor-] Show IPA
    adjective

    1. of or pertaining to a sophomore or sophomores.

    2. suggestive of or resembling the traditional sophomore; intellectually pretentious, overconfident, conceited, etc., but immature: sophomoric questions.

    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/sophomoric?s=t

    in reply to: F-35 debate thread. #2309663
    hopsalot
    Participant

    All nations should withdraw from NATO; it doesn’t serve anyone’s long-term interests; well, not outside Eastern Europe.

    I remember when I was a sophomore…

    hopsalot
    Participant

    (Reuters) – Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff has again delayed choosing a provider for 36 new Air Force jets, meaning the country likely won’t have any next-generation fighters available for security when it hosts the World Cup soccer tournament next year.

    The Air Force sent embassies representing the three companies that are finalists for the $4 billion-plus deal a letter this week requesting they renew their applications, which formally expire on March 30.

    The request extends the tender period by up to another six months, the Air Force said in an statement emailed to Reuters on Friday. The finalists are Boeing Co.’s F/A-18 Super Hornet, Dassault Aviation SA’s Rafale, and Saab AB’s Gripen.

    Rousseff has not indicated which option she favors, although Boeing appears to be the current frontrunner, thanks in part to efforts to deepen its strategic partnership with Brazilian aircraft maker Embraer SA.

    Rousseff has said any purchase must lead to technology transfers and other long-term benefits for Brazilian companies. She has also repeatedly told visiting U.S. officials she believes the F-18 is technically the superior jet.

    After the United States chose Embraer for a major defense contract on February 27, a senior Brazilian official told Reuters that was a “very good development” for Boeing’s hopes in the jets deal.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/08/us-brazil-jets-idUSBRE9270T620130308

    Looks like the Brazil deal will come down to a competition between the Super Hornet’s capability and the Rafale’s political advantages.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,491 through 2,505 (of 2,738 total)