dark light

Loke

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,056 through 2,070 (of 3,001 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The most "mis-understood" a/c in your opinion #2351468
    Loke
    Participant

    The most misunderstood fighter on this forum: F-35 :diablo:

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 6 #2352944
    Loke
    Participant

    Teer,

    Things like landing gear can be made by Brazil, they have the know-how to do that(and perhaps also India?), in particular under supervision from Saab. Brazilian companies are also involved in the design of the wings and other parts.

    The IRST proposed for Brazil is now from Selex, so it seems that drawing is not quite up-to-date. Still the point stands since Selex is European not US.

    Some parts are still from the US, mainly the engine and some other bits and pieces, but not as much as before it seems.

    Anyway I agree on the winner; either SH or F-16 will most likely win in India.

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 6 #2353073
    Loke
    Participant

    Teer, NG is very much different.

    I suggest you google around, there is a similar picture with the components for NG, and in which country they originate from.

    in reply to: 5th generation tactics/thinking #2355942
    Loke
    Participant

    I believe a Thales spokesperson said earlier this year that the three leading companies in the world of AESA fighter radars are Raytheon, Northrop Grumman, and Thales….

    Whereas a Selex person said they are Raytheon, Northrop Grumman and Selex…

    Perhaps an Elta person would say the leading three are Raytheon, Northrop Grumman and Elta…? 😉

    in reply to: Rafale News X #2356023
    Loke
    Participant

    Norway started with 72 F-16 in the early 80s (I think).

    Today we have only 57 left; most (if not all?) losses were due to accidents.

    However interestingly I don’t think we have lost a single plane since 2001! Perhaps a coincidence but we have not lost a single plane since we did an MLU, I am wondering if the MLU somehow helped, by e.g. giving increased situational awareness, maybe better resistance against bird strikes, etc. Operating Procedures may also play a big role. But still there is also the “random factors” that one can never control and which can always cause accidents to happen.

    Losing 4 planes in a large number of years seems not out of the ordinary, in particular since 2 of them were lost in one single accident.

    How many flight hours do the Rafale fleets got so far?

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion V #2360222
    Loke
    Participant

    Prospects are increasing that India will sustain four offerings in its $12-billion Medium Multirole Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) program but soon eliminate the MiG-35 and F‑16IN from the field.

    The downselect, which industry officials had widely expected would not take place until after February’s Aero India show in Bangalore, could become official as early as next month, program watchers indicate. The actual announcement of the decision, however, is still not expected until after the air show. Remaining in the battle to build at least 126 fighters would be the Saab Gripen, the only single-engine offering, along with the Eurofighter Typhoon, Dassault Rafale and Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet.

    It has appeared likely for some time that the MiG-35 would be dropped from the running, and in recent days the F-16I’s elimination has also begun to seem inevitable. A drawback of the F-16, according to Indian air force officials, is that Pakistan also operates a version of the fighter. The Indian government has consistently expressed its frustration and irritation at Washington’s continued supply of weapons—most notably more F-16s—to Islamabad, weapons India believes only serve to close the conventional military gap between the two countries.

    U.S. industry officials insist, however, that while India publicly expresses misgivings about the U.S.-Pakistani relationship, it is quietly less opposed because it sees Washington’s involvement as a stabilizing force.

    Furthermore, a Lockheed Martin official insists, “we have heard nothing that would suggest the Indian government would eliminate either U.S. competitor from the competition because of U.S. engagement with Pakistan. On the contrary, we are very confident, based on the results of the field evaluation trials, that the F-16IN Super Viper is fully compliant with India’s requirements.”

    […]

    Speculation in India has put the Eurofighter and Rafale ahead in the bidding, but Indian air force officials dismiss that. Moreover, the Gripen and F/A-18E/F have an edge in terms of price, which may be gaining greater weight in the selection process.

    The Gripen appears to have found indirect support from the government. The director of the Indian government’s official air power think tank says the Gripen suits the service’s requirements best. In a recent column, Air Commo.Jasjit Singh writes: “The choice that comes closest to the ‘medium’ multirole aircraft that the [Indian air force] has been seeking since a decade ago is the [Indian version of the Gripen NG].”

    Full story:

    http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story.jsp?topicName=Check6&id=news/awst/2010/11/22/AW_11_22_2010_p35-270656.xml&headline=Shortlisting,%20Shortly&channel=&from=topicalreports

    Seems Aviationweek joins the rumor mill…

    in reply to: Rafales for Brasil #4, Cachorro-quente! #2363398
    Loke
    Participant

    On the other hand France has to be getting VERY frustrated that the Brazilians keep delaying and delaying and delaying a deal they KNOW they’ve won just to extract a slightly better price.

    AFAIK the lasts statements from Jobim he has focused on ToT not price.

    The French are frustrated but perhap also the Brazilians are as well?

    They want a strategic partnership with France and perhaps it’s difficult for them to understand why they cannot get a significantly better ToT from their strategic partner than what the Gripen consortium can offer, in particular considering that the price is much higher…

    Anyway, IMHO France still has very high probability of winning this. But maybe they should not take it for granted?

    in reply to: CAMM vs RAM #2020428
    Loke
    Participant

    Mostly in the seeker Loke. With a semi active missile longer range high altitude targets can be engaged because the bearing rate, of a crossing target, is acceptable for the missile director. At close range the director has to track the target very quickly to keep the missile on target so a head-on target i.e one flying right for your ship is what you want to try and engage.

    As I understand it the Aussies, with their CEAMOUNT director, have developed some kind of local area capability for ESSM.

    I am sorry I don’t quite understand — are you saying that the ESSM does not provide area defence because of its semi-active targeting mechanism?

    I thought the SM-2 also had that semi-active radar homing, and AFAIK SM-2 is an area defence missile?

    in reply to: CAMM vs RAM #2020442
    Loke
    Participant

    Is the CAMM more in the same class as ESSM?

    I did not think ESSM was considered offering area defence, I thought the ESSM range was quite acceptable? Is there another reason why it’s not cosidered area defence capable? Or am I wrong?

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion V #2365729
    Loke
    Participant

    hah, latest rumor; F-16 is out

    http://livefist.blogspot.com/2010/11/mmrca-buzz-f-16-out-of-mmrca-bid.html

    The rumor mill will never stop — not until they give an official statement on a short list (or a winner)….

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion V #2365736
    Loke
    Participant

    This might have some bearing on the MMRCA and what kind of tech transfers boeing and lockhead martin can offer the Indian MOD.
    main report found on defense aerospace.

    I would now be surprised if either of the US a/c don’t win this…

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion V #2365738
    Loke
    Participant

    Taigy,

    interesting stuff, thanks. Do you know how the SA-6 was detected? Detection of emissions or something else?

    Saab has been working on Carabas for quite some time, a nice summary from Signatory:

    http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?84527-Gripen-News-Thread&p=4095171&viewfull=1#post4095171

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion V #2365804
    Loke
    Participant

    I don’t know the Gripen very well (to me, it’s the “little Rafale” that Germany and France could have designed), but I think Typhoon is still lagging behind Rafale and Gripen.

    Are you referring to the a2g capabilities of TYphoon, or something else?

    (Just curious).

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion V #2365835
    Loke
    Participant

    TMor,

    apart from the obvious things that Taygi mentioned (carrier-compatible and capable of carrying nukes) it is not yet clear to me what capabilities Rafale got that is lacking from Gripen and Typhoon. Is there something else? Or did you also refer to the abovementioned capabilities?

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion V #2366677
    Loke
    Participant

    Omnirole seems to indicate that non specced Rafales do SEAD Lite.
    whereas non-specced F-16CJs don’t even though they are SEAD jets.
    Same day, same skies, same threats!
    In other words and for the last time, please pretty please, the Rafale
    is a system of systems before even getting specific sensor equipment
    and uses them in synergy to obtain more correlated infos at any time.
    That it can do so stripped naked ( Which should include OSF however! )
    is what makes it OMNI-role as in you don’t have to go back home ’cause
    the wife forgot her handbag.

    So to you omnirole means integrated sensors and some jamming capabilities, basically SPECTRA?

    AFAIK both Typhoon and the NG will have something similar.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,056 through 2,070 (of 3,001 total)