dark light

Loke

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 3,001 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2126475
    Loke
    Participant

    No, no and no… There will be no modifying of either of the “floating devices” for a catapult!

    Of course not.

    Did you notice the word “theoretically”?

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2126501
    Loke
    Participant

    The alternatives for the RAF/RN (you are British, right?) right now are “Zero/nada/nyet” if they want to use those two big 65000 tons floating devices that are being built.

    Cheers

    Well, theoretically they could still make a switch to the Rafale! Of course not quite in the same league as the F-35, and I guess it would require a) a major political re-alignment and b) a small rebuild of the “floating devices”, but OToH the Rafale can carry more and further than the B and its tiny stomach. And even without “VLO” it is still very dangerous opponent, and will remain so for at least the next 30 years (assuming the opponent does not have US made gear).

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2126503
    Loke
    Participant

    NEW DELHI*—*India will invite global competitive bids to select a foreign single-engine fighter to be made in India, said Defense Minister Manohar Parrikar.

    Addressing a news conference here, Parrikar said the final selection for a western partner to provide a single-engine fighter for the Indian Air Force will depend on transfer of technology terms and the pricing proposed by the original equipment manufacturer.

    The global tender will be floated in the first quarter of 2018. At that time, a private company will be nominated as the strategic partners production agency and a two or more year process will kick off to evaluate technical and financial bids and conduct extensive trials, MoD official noted.

    The final government-to-government deal will be inked in 2021.

    http://www.defensenews.com/articles/parrikar-india-to-kick-off-competition-for-new-foreign-single-engine-fighters

    Interesting.

    Considering the focus on ToT and costs, and also considering the timelines, me thinks Sweden and Brazil is quite well positioned to box this one…

    ….unless they decide of course that Tejas mk1b (or mk2 or whatever follows after mk1a) will be good enough…

    in reply to: NSM/JSM news and update #1785976
    Loke
    Participant

    Two additional flight tests from an F-16 are planned for 2017

    Qualification of the missile will be completed on 2018

    Kongsberg conducted the first long-range powered flight test of the developmental Joint Strike Missile (JSM) over the Utah Test and Training Range in the United States on 29 October 2016. The test was only officially disclosed in late December 2016.

    Launched by an F-16C/D Fighting Falcon multirole aircraft from the US Air Force’s 445th Flight Test Squadron at Edwards Air Force Base, the missile successfully flew ” to range well beyond 200 km,” Pål Bratlie, the executive vice president of Kongsberg Defence Systems told IHS Jane’s .

    Probably more info about the flight test here, beyond the pay-wall:

    http://www.janes.com/article/66545/jsm-completes-first-powered-flight-test

    in reply to: Aegis vs Ashm #1786015
    Loke
    Participant

    MDA conducts SM-6 MRBM intercept test

    So far the SM6 has demonstrated Anti-Cruise Missile/OTH shots, AEGIS-SM6-F-35 interopreability , surface attack, short range ballistic missile interception and now the ability to intercept medium ranged ballistic missiles.

    The “anti-cruise missile” capability; does that includes against supersonic e.g. missiles like the Mach 3.5 Kh-31?

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2132105
    Loke
    Participant

    The radar modes that will support A2G employment of weapons won’t be available until at least 2023 but given the ongoing delays I expect it may be a year later than expected. The timeline was posted on here a number of months, perhaps even a year ago now and pretty sure it is in this thread.

    Hmm, I cannot recall having seen that — ms21 will be rolled out first (in 2019?) followed by ms22 a few years later but the details of what and when I don’t recall?

    No doubt they start with some capabilities in ms21 and expand this in ms22 and normally a2a is done first and then a2g so what you say sounds reasonable although I did not find the link to confirm it.

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2132342
    Loke
    Participant

    Does anyone know the status of Botswana’s potential order for 8 Gripen C/D, was it signed or are the two governments still in negotiation?

    AFAIK no news on this yet.

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2132345
    Loke
    Participant

    This makes sense. We know Gripen E won’t have full A2G capabilities for a number of years after IOC.

    I cannot recall having seen a detailed roadmap for when different capabilities will be rolled out?

    Have you seen such a thing? If yes, when and where?

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2132349
    Loke
    Participant

    Héroux-Devtek has received a contract from Saab to manufacture complete landing gear systems for the Gripen E fighter aircraft.

    The contract requires the company to manufacture, assemble and deliver complete landing gear systems for 96 Gripen E aircraft being developed for the Swedish and Brazilian air forces.
    Production of the landing gear systems will be carried out at Héroux-Devtek’s facilities located in the UK.

    Héroux-Devtek vice-president and COO Martin Brassard said: “Our UK operations have designed and manufactured landing gear systems for previous variants of the Gripen aircraft and this new contract acknowledges their expertise on an important programme.

    http://www.airforce-technology.com/news/newshroux-devtek-to-produce-landing-gear-for-saabs-gripen-e-fighter-aircraft-5700447

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2136314
    Loke
    Participant

    Misleading F-35 Answers Drafted by Pentagon, Testing Chief Says

    Pentagon officials have been preparing a misleading assessment of progress on Lockheed Martin Corp.’s F-35, the costliest U.S. weapons program, the Defense Department’s chief tester warned.

    • The F-35’s development phase is due to end in “early 2018.” Gilmore said the department should “state clearly that development flight testing will not complete — at the earliest” — until mid-2018.
    • Operational combat testing that all weapons systems must pass will start in mid-2018 and be completed a year later. Gilmore labeled that “false.” Instead, he said the tests will commence “no sooner than late 2018, or, more likely, in early 2019 but could be as late as 2020.”
    • An Air Force certification to lawmakers that F-35s delivered in fiscal 2018 will have full combat capability remains “valid.” Gilmore said that is “highly unlikely” because of delays in testing the critical final version of the plane’s software and correcting 276 pending deficiencies.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-12-07/misleading-f-35-answers-drafted-by-pentagon-testing-chief-says-iwerk3w8

    I seem to recall that one of the critisisms against Gilmore was that he was always “behind”; e.g. that a report written 6-12 months ago would point to problems that had already been solved.

    Have the problems mentioned in this November 28 memo also been solved already?

    in reply to: Canadian Fighter Replacement #2136795
    Loke
    Participant

    … and what is your source for the range of the APG-79? :rolleyes:

    What is your source for the range of the RBE2 AESA?

    The -79 is larger, so if they have the same tech level it should have a longer range, but we don’t really know about their performance so this is at the end of the day all speculation, from both of you…

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2137427
    Loke
    Participant

    Full throttle. Just as the Gripen E programme is going at full speed, the GE F414G engine is doing the same in the test aircraft. Engine on.

    Validation and verification activities such as tests in rigs and simulators have been performed and the ground test period is in full swing. The way model based development has been implemented, has been successful. “Power on” and engine starts are just two examples of important milestones that has been accomplished during the last months.

    “We are encouraged about the progress in the programme. The aircraft is responding really well to all our test and verification activities. Since the rollout in May, we have performed major milestones such as powering on the aircraft and engine start. What is left before we can take off, is software qualification to formally prove what we already informally know through our extensive testing,” says Lars Ydreskog, Head of Operations at the Aeronautics business area.

    http://www.gripenblogs.com/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=1559

    in reply to: World Missiles News #1786058
    Loke
    Participant

    According to alert5.com: “Test-firing of a S-300 missile system”:

    http://alert5.com/2016/12/05/test-firing-of-a-s-300-air-defense-missile-system-that-went-terribly-bad/

    what, where, and when is this?

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2139107
    Loke
    Participant

    NEW DELHI: Indian Navy chief Admiral Sunil Lanba here today said the indigenous Tejas Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) is “not up to the mark”, due to which they are searching another fighter aircraft for carrier operations within the next five years.

    Lanba said the navy will seek a fighter aircraft from elsewhere, while it is still encouraging India’s Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) to develop the Naval LCA.

    Read more at:
    http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/55747038.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

    Ooops, that was somewhat of a surprise.

    A new interesting competition sailing up…!?

    in reply to: Canadian Fighter Replacement #2139505
    Loke
    Participant

    Thanks, I did not see those (seems my searching skills were not very strong).

    Anyway it still seems to me that this could be on par with Rafale technology — I am no expert on data transfer technology but “high speed ethernet” sounds pretty good to me?

    But yeah, definitely not in the same league as F-35 (which is what I already stated above).

    When was the twitter image published? I notice it says 8 1553B data buses whereas the other image you refer to seems to list only 4?

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 3,001 total)