Page 40 – Key Publishing

beistrich

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 668 total)

← 1 2 3 … 39 40 41 … 43 44 45 →

Author

Posts
August 28, 2004 at 3:16 pm in reply to: 767-300 The world's most expensive private jet #670532

beistrich
Participant

The saudi-kingdom have A340-200

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/252424/L/

August 28, 2004 at 3:10 pm in reply to: Thai "to buy 6 A380s, 2 A340s" #670533

beistrich
Participant

Not a BIG ENOUGH market to warrant them building a direct competitor.

beistrich, remember that orders mean absolutely nothing until delivereis have taken place and the bird has to prove itself in service. Then we’ll see how it fares.

yeah i forgot you think all orders are only jokes, the A380 will not fly and aliens will come to buy boeing-planes :p

btw: Boeing did say there ist no market for such a big plane.

August 28, 2004 at 3:02 pm in reply to: Commercial cargo aircraft, what's the most efficient? #670540

beistrich
Participant

the A300 and A310 do not number nearly as many as the DC8s and 727’s alone. Besides, we’re talking about most efficient. the A300 or a310 do not come into this.

I think efficiency in terms of versatility will be a Turboprop’s domain. They can in and out of strips jets cannot even hope to get into.
As to which turboprop is the most efficient. Pass

there are soooooo many variables.

lol
The A300/A310 not as effizent as the Dc8/727? Nonsense

Well and there many A300F out there

August 28, 2004 at 1:15 pm in reply to: 767-300 The world's most expensive private jet #670724

beistrich
Participant

There are many sheiks who have privats A340

And some aircrafts (A340-500) from Qatar Airways did only fly as “privat jet”

August 28, 2004 at 1:04 pm in reply to: Thai "to buy 6 A380s, 2 A340s" #670729

beistrich
Participant

Boeing say there are no market for the A380

I wonder why there are nearly every month orders for this bird 😀

August 28, 2004 at 12:56 pm in reply to: Commercial cargo aircraft, what's the most efficient? #670734

beistrich
Participant

Theres is no way you can mention the A380F here. Its not built!

ok no A380F and B747A (freighter)

I’d like to see a 737 landing on an ice runway.

By that I mean a runway which is actualy nothing more than a crude runway, bulldozed on top of a glacier! That would rip a 737 apart!
Thats where the turboprops come in.

The most popular Jet cargo planes are

DC8, 727, 747 and DC-10. but these aren’t all as versatile in terms of where they can operate as the humbe turbo prop.

and A300/A310 too.

August 28, 2004 at 10:55 am in reply to: SIA to expand fleet with purchase of 31 777-300ERs #670976

beistrich
Participant

And of course, triple Sevens divert to winter airports miles from no where on a regular basis 😉
Personaly, knowing of the extra safety features a long range twin needs to have.. I’d feel safer on a twin, be it an A330, 757 or 777.

flying a 757 trans atlantic in 2 weeks, looking forward to it.

i feel on a A340 or B747 safe too

August 28, 2004 at 10:52 am in reply to: Commercial cargo aircraft, what's the most efficient? #670982

beistrich
Participant

All Cargo if you can 🙂

MD-11F, A300, A332 MRTT, B747A (cargo version) or A380-800F

August 28, 2004 at 12:12 am in reply to: MAN pics 25/08/2004 #671448

beistrich
Participant

very dry day? 😀

What camera do you use?

August 27, 2004 at 11:47 pm in reply to: Commercial cargo aircraft, what's the most efficient? #671490

beistrich
Participant

All cargo aircrafts or only for out-size freight?

August 27, 2004 at 7:17 pm in reply to: Thai "to buy 6 A380s, 2 A340s" #672162

beistrich
Participant

Good

August 26, 2004 at 6:28 pm in reply to: "The sun has got his hat on…" #673512

beistrich
Participant

The Airbus-320 looks great!

August 26, 2004 at 12:08 am in reply to: 2000 posts and goodbye #674405

beistrich
Participant

Airbus Sucks! 😀 I am outta here :rolleyes:

Maybe he leave because of the stupid anti-airbus posts

August 24, 2004 at 10:45 pm in reply to: No love for the F-16? #2664855

beistrich
Participant

Of course it will be more than the F-16, the Su-35 is simply bigger, carries more thrust and much more internal fuel than aircraft using both internal and external fuel, duh duh duh. lay of the crack pipe and get out of the thread if you’re going to be anti-Russian. There’s only room for one of those and it’s going to be me! 😀

He is not anti-russian, he is only ultra-pro-f-16 😉

August 23, 2004 at 11:02 pm in reply to: No love for the F-16? #2665661

beistrich
Participant

Sure (remember it’s Sure not Shure) the Gripen is nice if your country is the size of Switzerland, has barely any hostile air threats, friendly with western nations and the money. Other wise you need alot of bases to get that leg-less Gripen anywhere, not to mention Swedish export policies and the fact that it’s much more costlier than other fighters of it’s class and costlier than some versions of new F-16s! 😮 and people thought i was crazy.. 😀

You can say the same about the small F-16.

The Gripen is very cheap
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 668 total)

← 1 2 3 … 39 40 41 … 43 44 45 →