dark light

beistrich

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 668 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Europe and US in aircraft aid row #691911
    beistrich
    Participant

    Well bush want a few more vote

    in reply to: 1000 #691930
    beistrich
    Participant

    a few more and i have 100 😉

    beistrich
    Participant

    Well you can only make a plane stealthy, you cant make a “real” stealth plane, who cant be found

    beistrich
    Participant

    The Eurofighter a bad fighter? NO

    The Eurofighter Trance1/2 is better as nearly all fighters out there.

    And for the Future there is the Tranche 3

    in reply to: Germany and JSF #2645691
    beistrich
    Participant

    The Tornado will be replaced around in 2020 like the mirage 2000.

    The french air force wants UCAV ( with air to ground capacities) to mix with the Rafale fleet. It will be cheaper than a F35.

    Dassault is working on it with Saab and greeks, why not the germans?

    http://www.dassault-aviation.com/salons/admin/images/actualites/avec_200.jpg

    With the germans. Eads and Dassault have a arrangement. They work on UCAVs/UAVs together

    in reply to: Another Scottish Selection #696392
    beistrich
    Participant

    nice

    Red Arrows and a An-124

    in reply to: Olympic Games on #1967683
    beistrich
    Participant

    but you can say yet one thing: Greece made a good job

    in reply to: End of the road for 747s? #696408
    beistrich
    Participant

    Oh, this Airbus vs Boeing stuff has long since become boring and pathetic. 😡

    Both companies produce fine aircraft; both have introduced innovative technologies in the past and will continue to do so in the future; both are subsidised by Governments in their various ways; both offer discounts and sweeteners to persuade airlines to buy their products; both can readily prove that their products are better than those of the other company.

    Neither has a monopoly on truth and virtue, neither is the manifestation of all that is evil in this world.

    Can we all, especially the “partisans” on both sides, get it out of our systems now, please?

    Thank you!

    right

    in reply to: End of the road for 747s? #696665
    beistrich
    Participant

    From boeings website

    I’m still trying to get some fuel burn data

    How a suprise Boeing write they a better as Airbus

    in reply to: End of the road for 747s? #698001
    beistrich
    Participant

    and with all due respect… A.net is not the most reliable source.

    Reason? written by enthusiasts. LOL

    But this numbers are right. Any proplem with the truth?

    in reply to: End of the road for 747s? #698197
    beistrich
    Participant

    Your writing is very hard to read, I cant understand half of what you write.

    i know..

    in reply to: End of the road for 747s? #698198
    beistrich
    Participant

    to 737-700 vs: A319

    “737-700 – Range with 126 pax 2852km (1540nm) or 6037km (3260nm) for HGW version.”

    A319: “Speeds similar to A320. Range at 64 tonne (141,095lb) takeoff weight 3391km (1831nm), range at 75,500kg (166,450lb) takeoff weight 6845km (3697nm)”

    From airliners.net

    in reply to: End of the road for 747s? #698216
    beistrich
    Participant

    Here are a few quotes I found regarding this…

    Well proganda can i post too. I ask for numbers

    If i write a little to hard: sorry

    in reply to: Iberia Livery: 2nd attempt :) #698234
    beistrich
    Participant

    Looks fine

    But without the yellow fuselage, maybe it looks better (please dont kill me 😮 )

    in reply to: End of the road for 747s? #698377
    beistrich
    Participant

    Have anyone numbers?

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 668 total)