dark light

RPSmith

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,081 through 1,095 (of 2,488 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Fairey Battle evaluated in the USA #1194458
    RPSmith
    Participant

    I thought the Double Mamba was two engines, each driving their own propellor in opposite directions on the same thrust line. Either engine could be shut down and re-started in flight.

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Fairey Battle evaluated in the USA #1194578
    RPSmith
    Participant

    so, is there anything that was on US companies drawing boards that the Battle might have influenced??

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Fairey Battle L5343 Progress #1195821
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Yes.

    I have been told that it would have been near impossible for the bomb aimer to get out with a parachute on and so they were not issued with one.

    The passage from the book I quote in my post above suggests they both exited the same way – from the Gunner’s area. Not having been in a Battle is this feasible?

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Aircraft Hangar Identification #1195822
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Despite the more modern brickwork – it still looks very similar in size and shape to a Bessonneau type…. I’ve been looking at some old photos online, and wonder if the framework originally used to support the canvas could have been re-used with new more substantial cladding?…….

    You could well be right – I need to get to see the inside

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Aircraft Hangar Identification #1195824
    RPSmith
    Participant

    [QUOTE=hunterxf382;1302789]Couple of ariel views showing different aspects…QUOTE]
    Yep, that’s it.

    ‘558 – I’ve had a look but can’t see any likely candidates.

    If anyone is interested I’ve been to our brand, spanking, new Local History facility this pm:-
    The OS map for 1926 shows it, the one for 1913 doesn’t.
    Had a look at some surviving building approval plans – the triple-bay sheds with darker grey roofs to the north (between the building in question and Barras Green) were approved in April/May, 1920 (for the Midland Sidecar and Light Body Company). The white-roofed building to the south/adjoining the building in question was approved (for the Midland Light Bodies Company) in Aug/Sep, 1922. On the Block Plan for this latter ‘our’ building is shown and, intriuguingly someone has pencilled the word “hangar” on it!

    The plot thickens! it does, then, seem possible it was erected during WW1 or, perhaps, it was bought as war surplus and moved to it’s new site after the cessation of hostilities – how quickly did the RAF close down it’s airfields?

    Enquiries continue….

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Tornado F3 Gate Guard – Oh Dear! #1196520
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Just hope the crane driver didn’t shout “Jesus Christ” when it happened :diablo::diablo:

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Aircraft Hangar Identification #1196571
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Wiesso,

    Yes the letter in the local rag from June (I only saw it a few days ago) has prompted my enquiry. I tracked down the author of the letter then spoke to his “source” (who owns a car repair business on the same mini-industrial estate) who told me of the local folk-lore.

    With the aerial pics you got the right area but it’s a little more to the north (above you first pic and to the left of the second) – greyish roof with a hole in it.

    bazv, no, not been able to access interior yet – I realize seeing the internal roof structure will be an important clue. There has been vague mention of keys but I got to push a bit more.

    phantom phil, thanks for that but no, it’s much smaller that a conventional RAF Station hangar

    moggy – thanks for your response – will follow up.

    Hopefully I have attached a pic I took today.

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Fairey Battle L5343 Progress #1196919
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Were there really only two parachutes, for three crew, on the Battle?

    Possibly this thought was brought about by the fact (I think) that the Battle was only originally intended to have a crew of two??

    I am currently reading “Strike Hard, Strike True” (Ralph Barker, 1963) and in the chapter “The Maastricht Bridges” P/O Davy’s aircraft caught fire (after dropping their bombs) and Davy ordered Paterson (Gunner) and Mansell (Observer) to jump….
    “Patterson was the first to go. He struck the tail fin and broke his ankle and wrist, but landed safely. Mansell followed and made a safe exit. The space of half a minute between their exit times meant the difference between five years in a POW camp for Patterson and escape behind the allied lines for Mansell.” With the fire beginning to die down Davy managed to make a successful force-landing in a field near Amifontaine.

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Whirlwind #1197144
    RPSmith
    Participant

    ……..and the westland version powered by the Alvis, which from what i have been told is pretty much a copy of the american engine………

    I don’t think the Alvis Leonides engines owed anything to Mr. Pratt, Mr. Whitney or Mr. Wright. It’s true genesis was the Bristol Jupiter via Gnome-Rhone and test-flew before WW2.

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Auster AOP.9 on the move #1201380
    RPSmith
    Participant

    …….Many thanks to Porretta’s …….

    wot no pics of Lady Godiva???? :diablo::diablo:

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: A Picture for Handley Page fans #1202748
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Are there such things…..?:diablo:

    what, pictures? we see them on here all the time – sometimes black & grey & white, occasionally in colour!

    Roger Smith :diablo::diablo:

    in reply to: JDK's pointless quiz No.6,094 ish #1204141
    RPSmith
    Participant

    That’s one of the best photos I’ve seen of the R.E.8 hanging in AirSpace James. Far end of balcony with a telephoto?

    I still question whether they would have had such a large area of unpainted metal panels at the front end.

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: Signature identification please. #1204160
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Which country did Diables Rouges come from (Belgium??) and what did they fly in 1977? – are they still going??

    Roger Smith.

    in reply to: DH.86 Express #1209696
    RPSmith
    Participant

    Hi Roger ……It would be a huge help for me if I could get a copy of the manual for DH86.
    Is there any way I’d be able to get a copy from you?
    Geoff Reichelt
    [email]reichelt@airwaveyachts.com.au[/email]

    Geoff,

    Sent you an e-mail

    Roger Smith.

    PS I think those replicas look pretty-damned-good too 🙂

    in reply to: Hughie Green ..The Pilot? (Be wary: old thread) #1209865
    RPSmith
    Participant

    [QUOTE=RPSmith;1236151] Still got to find that “Flying Review” article:o QUOTE]
    At last – it’s in Vol. 20 No. 10 (June, 1965) pages 55/56.

    Written by C. J. Luxton who was one of the three occupants of Cessna 310 “Oscar Kilo” – HG was pilot, CJL co-pilot (operating the radio) and the third person was Jim Preston a journalist. HG was travelling to do a show for the Services.

    They were flying from Stuttgart to Gatow via Frankfurt at 9,500ft cruising at 200mph. Ten minutes after entering the 20 mile wide corridor Berlin radar told them of another aircraft “approaching fast from five o’clock” – a MiG flew past/in front of them. After flying past a second time very fast the Russian pilot extended flaps and undercarraige and made signs for the Cessna to follow and land – which were ignored.

    The MiG opened fire although not hitting the Cessna and a Yak-25 joined in flying across their path at supersonic speed making the Cessna rock violently, almost rolling on it’s back and the left engine stopped. The two Russians repeated their manaeovres and the occupants of the Cessna agreed they would have to give in and turned right. However, informed by Berlin that they were only 27 miles away, the Cessna was turned back on course and dived to gain max speed. The MiG returned and started firing again but, fortunately, the Cessna found a little cloud cover and made it to Gatow.

    The sequel was that the Russian Commander would not then grant safe passage for the aircraft on it’s flight out of Berlin so the three occupants returned to London by BEA Viscount. Eventually told by the British Embassy in Bonn they could fly it out “at their own risk” they returned to Gatow by Viscount and sneaked out early one morning without using any radio and flying at low level along the shorter corridor to Hanover thence on to London.

    Roger Smith.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,081 through 1,095 (of 2,488 total)