It has been suggested to me that the photo was taken at Baginton in the early 1950s. Can anyone confirm that or offer an alternative suggestion?
Don’t think so – the background doesn’t look Baginton (but I May be wrong)
Roger Smith.
Thanks for that JS.
Your comment about them having a step in the starboard/inboard flap is interesting as the Yeovilton example doesn’t appear to have one. The inboard flaps on both sides have a considerable loss of paint suggesting high wear through access.
Roger Smith.
Heard half a discussion on the radio a few days ago about ethanol. Henry Ford’s Model T was designed to run on it – I didn’t hear what the differences are engine-wise though. The introduction of Prohibition in the ‘States caused petroleum use to leap ahead and become dominant.
Made from water, sugar and yeast it takes between 14 to 16 lbs of sugar to produce a litre of ethanol and thus can be produced a lot cheaper than oil-based fuels. Qld Spitty you are not far off the mark 🙂
Roger Smith.
Thanks bazv – hadn’t thought of that. It’s still a fairly unusual configuration though. (thinks – Miles M.20, ??)
Roger Smith.
Thanks for that JS, nice piece of film – although I thought it a shame there isn’t a bit more of the wing un-folding at the start. Did I see that one was unfolding with flaps up and another with flaps down?
Couple of other observations/questions:
Never noticed before that take off is almost a three-pointer – the main wheels coming off almost the same time or very soon after the tail wheel. I suppose that some of that might be due to the greater travel on the main u/c legs though.
What was the reason that the fin/rudder was set so far forward (compared to tailplane/elevators)? My simple brain says – further forward = less moment = more surface area required = more weight. Anyone know why?
I too saw the FAAM Corsair for the first time in it’s “old coat of paint” a few weeks ago and echo the previous complimentary remarks.
Roger Smith.
A Sea Vixen table for all the bridesmaids :D:D
Roger Smith.
got a pic of it we can see? 🙂
Roger Smith.
Have you tried the Handley Page Association?
http://www.handleypage.com/Association_page.html
Roger Smith.
You are aware there is already a group/museum running with the name Jet Age?
Roger Smith.
Superb archive of pictures.
Particularly liked the A-26 with a day-glo painted Firebee stuck on top of each outer wing – great modelling subject!
Roger Smith
thanks bravoalpha – mine was a typical case of 2 + 2 = 5 🙁
If I’d have dug a little deeper I could have answered my own question.
Anyway this John Farley had been involved in the Vimy replica, was restoring Messenger ‘KBO to fly (the family were planning to continue this and hoped it would fly in 2008) and the family are also hoping to continue with the HP 42 flying replica project.
Roger Smith.
Of course you could buy the new “Wreck & Relics” 😉
Roger Smith.
A labour of love by Barry Clay.
He also runs Wings over Warwickshire on Google Groups which covers present day aviation activity in the county and historical stuff
Roger Smith.
Any offers as to whats going on???
Chumpy.
Don’t know Chumpy – wonder what the aircraft is landing in the background of the first shot. It’s low-wing (so not another Ensign) but I can’t make out whether it has two or four engines – DC2??
Roger Smith.
Parasol monoplanes
Can anybody explain to me why this aircraft is apparently so popular?
I think it’s all down to looks…
Thers something about parasol monoplanes that appeal to me.
Britain built, comparatively, few parasols – Westland Widgeon is another – wheras some European countries (France, Poland) used the layout over and over.
Despite being a civil light aeroplane it has an agressive stance – put it in camo and some roundels it could pass as a 30s fighter?
Roger Smith.