Thanks U2!- And as for Mr Ezells restoration skills, that BEAUTIFUL P-38 speaks for itself, eh?
Wasn’t it in the Coventry area?
Great Air to Air of her in this months Aircraft Illustrated (DO hope i’m not banned for mentioning another Mag!)
Luckily for me and plenty of other aircraft engineers flying aircraft rot as quickly if not more than static ones! The RAF viewed the Gustav as a museum piece – the entirely logical place for it was the RAF museum .
There are Buchon’s flying in Europe flying with DB engines – are you really suggesting flying a priceless aircraft which you cannot replace in the form of ‘Black 6’ when there are aircraft in the form of the Buchon which are readily available .
– Of course flying aircraft rot the same way as static ones, but the point is they HAVE to be given more TLC when they fly, you must know that!- until quite recently there were no Buchons in (England-where i live!) of course i would prefer Black 6 to be flying-the team that looked after her wanted her to fly until spares became a problem- i just agree with them! and, whilst rare, its not the only Gustav in the world-and the RAF have no plans to ground their equally priceless Lancaster as far as i’m aware
There is absolutely no reason to believe that the Gustav is rotting from the inside out. The atmosphere is more closely controlled at Hendon then it is at most airfield hangars. The aircraft was crashed – it was due to be retired and had been extended. The RAF had no long term plan to fly her and why should they . Whilst the sound of the DB engine might have been wonderful – is it any less wonderful than one of the modified Buchon engined hybrids from Europe? Simply put why risk the only example you have of a Gustav?
It may be closely controlled but when an aircraft is flying it HAS to be well looked after because of the risk to life and limb-and the agreement with the RAFM was more to do with the ego of the RAFM museum head than any other reason – as for Buchons they sound ok but they look ugly compared to a DB engined ‘109 and should not be in Luftwaffe markings, anyway!
Its a shame that a perfecrtly airworthy Aircraft was grounded to join a museum that already had an Aircraft of the same type!- I thought it sounded wonderful!- and i would rather they risk flying aircraft (which, after all is what they are designed to do) than have them sit lifeless in a museum possibly rotting from the inside out!
She is CAPABLE of flying though- she was repaired by the original team- and thats the crying shame!!!
Whilst Black 6 was destined to be placed in the RAFM, the small matter of her coming to rest upside-down in a field by the M11 had some contribution to her current status.
It was restored to flying condition after AVM Allison’s unfortunate finger trouble with the Radiatoir flap switch though!
and to see black six there knowing full well that she could have easily flown again!!! its the only aviation museum i dislike, sorry to say 🙁 id heard about the DX p47 isnt she going to be restored to fly?
– i stopped going there after they got Black 6!- they already had an Emil so why they had to ground her i don’t know
I’m Fascinated by the engineering too- Its great to see an Aircraft built up from a pile of bits- by people who’ve most likely never worked on that aircraft before, and who probably haven’t got all the drawings- when a restoration eventually flies (flys??) i worry about it crashing!- and i agree about Hendon- they might as well be models
Can’t argue, that IS quick!
No.
I’m still up for volunteering – if anyone will let me anywhere near their aeroplane
– ME TOO!- but all i can offer is my exceptional Tea making skills!:)
So, Mark 12 IS Peter Arnold after all!!- I’m feeling smug for guessing that!!
Fascinating stuff!- i suppose an alternative title could be RED stars and stripes?- perhaps not!
It’s been that colour since 1987!!!
DOH!!!!:D