dark light

Ja Worsley

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,666 through 1,680 (of 3,659 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Why large deck structures #2043821
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Mate who knows what the ADF is thinking, the RAN want the F-100, Industry want the F-124 and the current government want the DDG-51, so it’s going to be a toss up over who wins, personally I would have thought that the RAN would win out because they have to operate these for the next 30 years or so.

    in reply to: Dash 7 and Dash 8 #582429
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Yes that’s the same argument I’ve been hearing in an article on Maritime surveilance planes, the Dash 7 Ranger was pitted against the BAe 748 Coastguarder and the Fokker F-27 Maritime both of these having the Dart engines and the D7 having four PT6-67’s

    in reply to: Maritime Surveilance #2628123
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    well that’s a start thanks mate

    in reply to: Why large deck structures #2043843
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Yes Scoot it is mate, to tell you the truth not many were happy when the RAN bought the OHP design due to the designs brick wall frontage. They don’t want to go any higher than these and with the USN frequently visiting Sydney harbour all the time many have seen these ships in close inspection and are not happy with them, Asthetically speaking. I guess it’s another reason we didn’t buy the Kidds.

    in reply to: ASC Selected to build AWD's for RAN #2043847
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Wan: mate there are some out that may say I am, but no I’m not.

    Scoot: very interesting mate.

    in reply to: Status and Pics please #2043871
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Wow very impressive mate, thanks, but it doesn’t give the current status, is she still active?

    in reply to: Dash 7 and Dash 8 #583481
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Any pics there mate?

    in reply to: Why large deck structures #2044066
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Well most of it does have to do with the electronics suite, and it centers around the Phased Pannelar Radar which you can see with those odd shapes, they take up a lot of room, and for the effective range they offer, you need them up high.

    This is changing though, as electronice become more powerfull and smaller we will see a return to lower decks, the Meko offers have the Phased Array Radar on a pylon mounted amid ship and it rotates. this is not as good as the American system simply because it doesn’t provide total coverage all the time, which the American system does.

    in reply to: ASC Selected to build AWD's for RAN #2044068
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    That’s right Wan, they agreed to start using metric but because they’d have to reschool their entire work force (so much metric equals this much imperial) it was safer to say, we’ll agree and those who are smart enough can work it out but those who can’t be bothered we’ll just save them the hastles. Reschooling is the bigger cost here and with todays shrinking defence budgets, who has money for that sort of thing?

    Though I did hear that the US builders now offer Metric or imperial tooling when selling their products to forgein customers.

    in reply to: Royal Navy WW2 headgear #2044071
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Always a pleasure my old friend 🙂

    in reply to: ASC Selected to build AWD's for RAN #2044530
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    So are Brisbane, Hobart and Australia. Perth will be the last of the ANZACs due for delivery next year.

    Australia is reserved for Flagships and I expect one of the two new carriers to be named as such, I expect Canberra to be the other since it is the capital of Australia, thus leaving Adelaide, Brisbane and Hobart for the three new AWD’s

    The point I was trying to make about the Japanese ships was that their ships were made to differing standards to those of their American counterpart, at least they thought of the Helo 😉 and they also use Metric tools not silly out dated Imperial things that only America has now

    in reply to: Invincible class CVL future #2044548
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Ok guys allow me to clarrify one point:

    AUSTRALIA IS NOT INTERESTED IN BUYING ANY OF THIS CLASS AT ALL

    We were offered the Ark Royal back in 1980 and then the offer was taken back due to the Falklands war, there is still alot of bad feelings down here over the recinderence of the offer. Besides Aistralia doesn’t buy secondhand defence item any more no matter what it is (as exemplified by the refusal of both Upholder subs and Surplus Arleigh Burke class DDG’s- The US had offered the RAN five original DDG-51’s for the price of three, but the deal was refused on the grounds that these ships had no organic aviation compliment)

    Besides the Olympus Tynes would need some serious overhaul by the end of the carriers lives and since we’re are mostly using the LM-2500’s in all our main ships, this would place an undue strain on the logistics we have here. We have no use for these ships, we recognise the historical significance in them but their use is of extremely limited value to us down here, but thanks for thinking of us 😉

    in reply to: Russian Navy Photographs #2044722
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Interesting, thanks

    in reply to: Royal Navy WW2 headgear #2044723
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Hi Moggy Nice to see you visiting us again!

    Yes it’s called a Tally Band and is worn around the mid section of a sailors cap. For those who are of a ships compliment they are required to have the TB of that ship around their caps with in a week of joining that ship. For those passing through may have something just signifying what service they are in e.g the “HMS” TB’s you saw. Down here in Australia we have our own versionsbut still follow the British line due to the Queen still being our head of state.

    Examples of Australian Tally Band:
    http://www.awm.gov.au/underattack/images/enlarge/REL01247.001.jpg

    For people who serve in support roles or roles that can’t be mentioned, here in Australia they wear simply “Royal Australian Navy” on their TB’s

    in reply to: R-22 INS Viraat #2044726
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Very Very nice mate, thanks for the contribution. What is the current status of the IN Harrier Fleet?

Viewing 15 posts - 1,666 through 1,680 (of 3,659 total)