Crob: mate you know me too well, hahahahahaha. It’s interesting that the Russians have not sold any Yak 36’s to anyone for display purposes!
I’ll have to check out the Airbus website.
I just heard on the 16:30 news, that the government had a paper published last September outlining the security concerns with all of Australia’s major airports. The result of which is now a Security Auditor appointed by the government, with full rights of power, will now go to each airport and check on their security.
Should any concern be raised, the person/persons involved will be automatically sacked and the comapny controlling that airport fined! The concern is that bad that an investigation has found that most of the people in baggage handling has extencive criminal histories including one person who had completed an eight year scentance for trying to smuggle in drugs.
All of this is doing nothing to boost my confidence in air travel.
Crisis is an understatement, The government should never have sold off the Airports, regardless of how much they claim they made!
After the government gave up control, security was compramised and troubles started! Terrorists got jobs as Baggage handlers (Willy Bregiet), people were found wandering in restricted areas (numerous cases here- the last was only three months ago when an old man got lost and walked through the closest door) and now this inccident with the drug smuggeling racket. Oh and I forgot to mention the contract security guards who have allowed certain items to go through without proper checks.
Sydney Airport is so deep in trouble that it’s going to take a lot to get out of. IMHO the government should buy it back from the current owners (Macquarie Bank- who have a long history of security breaches, I know because I worked there as a security guard just as they were planing to implement their own security), and take control of the situation. ONLY the Government has the willingness and resources to impliment high level security measures that are required to keep the public safe and at ease.
All interesting designes mate, none of which the USN would go for because they are too progresive for their traditional minds!
The Clement Ader has one major flaw in it’s design, the landing strips clash with the take off areas, thus you couldn’t launch and recover at the same time which was the whole reason the angled deck design came about! See how the CVX designs here have the landing strips canted out rather than in!
The second design was an adeptation of the current CVN design and proposed for the CV-21 comp, it has the standard CVN hull but has the extraside for landing/take off’s and the Center island. The only thing that let this design down was the fact that it had three lifts, On either side aft and on centerline forward meaning that they could recover planes faster than they could launch them, and if they were to move planes from hanger to deck during flight ops, then they would have to interupt the cycle to allow aircraft to be moved up on deck via the aft lifts.
The last design was the most promising, it had the four lifts required by the USN, one either side of the tower and two aft in tandem. But like I said before, the USN are too set in their traditional ways to consider any radical design concepts!
She also was the first BB to successfully launch a aircraft.
That would be the Curtus C-1 of 1909 with Dennis Ellie at the controls, right?
Terran: Can’t you honestly be sure about that?
40??? Wow, that’s going to creat a lot of surplus, India may get more after all.
The B-52 can also be used in the Maritime strike role and this is what I was refering to!
Congrats mate, keep up the good work!
Thanks mate, I knew I saw it somewhere and that I wasn’t going crazy (well on this matter at least). Yeah those boilers were going to cost more than the ship was worth to replace, add to that the cost of fixing the damage the fire caused (and you know you can never get rid of the smell of a fire, no matter what you do), it was deemed not worthy to repair, so they sunk it.
I know at one of the Marine stations there is a memorial to those 12 men who lost their lives in that fire, not sure which base it is though!
And that’s another thing, why is it so darn hard to get a pic of the elevator on this class???
Hmmm a few quetions.
How many are they thinking of building?
Where are they getting the money?
Where would they get the money for the aircraft?
What aircraft are they thinking of putting on it/them?
How are they going to structure their remaining fleet for protection?
When did she go to China?
Do we all really believe that she is going to stay a theme park?
The Chinese are very canny and I suspect that she may have had a good inspection before being proceded to theme park status!
Ok guys, given that the new PA2 is going to be bigger than CdG, by a long shot, would the Mn decide to retire this carrier for sale to a suitable country (bearing in mind that she is nuclear powered- or would they rip out the reactors and use them in something else and install standard engines for sale), and then use the money from the sale of CdG for the purchace of a second carrier of the PA2 class?
Bag: mate that is a good question but under the Arms limitation treaty signed after Japans surrender does not allow Japan any carriers ever again. Still a helo carrier is pushing these limitations to the letter but I think they will be allowed to have them!