Arthur: I never said it was used in Korea did I mate??? If you read the ebay entry I just repeted what was in it!
Arthur: I knew you’d try and pick me to bits, you’re like a fish in the pond and I’m the fisherman!
The new SF-260’s are turbo props and are armed. All the rest are from my various sorces pooled together.
Exactly what i said to him in a chat 😉
Interesting that the Germans are offering the fuelcell right from day one where as the French are offering it as an upgrade later on.
What I would like to know is how is the IN plans for procurement of the four Akula class subs going?
Well now they’re on to the Flight III model.
Oh dear Arthur’s at it again, too many of those dutch beers!
Ok well since I’m out of my league (yet again) here is the lcurrent list of armed TP users globally:
Aermacchi Redigo/ Vamlet Vinka: Eritrea, Finland , Mexico.
Aermacchi SF-260E: Italy, Mexico.
Aerospatiale TB 30 Epsilon: Togo (this is the only user of this plane that has it armed).
Beech T-34C Turbo Mentor: Argentina, Ecuadore, Peru, Taiwan, Uruguay.
Dassult Atlantic and Atlantique 2: France, Germany (soon to retire in favour of Orions bought from the Dutch), Italy and Pakistan (unique in being the only country to operate both the Alt and Orion in the same sqdn).
EADS CASA C212: Angola, Bolivia, Chile, Columbia, Dominica, Panama, Paraguay, Portugal, Surinam, Uruguay, Venezuela.
EADS CASA CN-235: Ireland, Spain, Turkey.
Embraer EMB-111 (P-95): Angola, Brazil, Chile, Gabon, Peru.
FMA IA-58 Pucara: Argentina, Columbia, Sri Lanka, Uruguay.
Fokker F-50: Singapore.
GAF Nomad N-22/N-24: Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, Phillipines, Thailand (mostly used as gunships with .50 cal gun pods under the wings).
[b]Grumman S-2 Tracker:[b] Argentina, Taiwan, Uruguay.
Grumman OV-1 Mohawk: Argentina (I have seen pics of these machines with light bombs on them as well).
IAI Arava: Bolivia, Cameroon, Ecudore, El Salvadore, Guatemala, Honduras, Venezuela.
Ilyushin Il-38 May: India, Russia.
IAe CN-235: Brunei, Indonesia (these are different a/c toi those built by EADS CASA).
Lockheed AC-130 Specture: USA.
Lockheed P-3 Orion: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Chile, Germany*, Greece, Iran+, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, Pakistan, Portugal, South Korea, Spain, Thailand (* being bought from the Netherlands and delivered after the planed upgrade, + Iran’s P-3 fleet is in an unknown status, they haven’t flown for some time but that doesn’t preclude them from still flying).
Lockheed CP-140 Aurora/Arcturus: Canada (thesde a/c differ from the standard Orions in that they have the systems of an S-3 Viking on board).
Pilatus PC-6 Turbo Porter/ Fairchild AU-23 Peacemaker: Thailand.
Pilatus PC-9: Angola, Australia,Croatia, Iraq+, Myanmar (Burma). (Most of the Iraqi Armed PC-9’s were destroyed during operation Iraqi Freedom).
PZL Warszawa-OkecieTurbo Orlik: Poland
Rockwell OV-10 Bronco: Indonesia, Morroco, Phillipines, South Korea, Thailand, Venezuela.
Tupolev TU-95/142 Bear: India, Russia
F-50’s? What happened to the A-50’s? Are they not the same?
Brazil buying Golden Eagles doesn’t really sound plausable, besides, once again they’d have to get approval from the US (via lockheeds involvment in the project 50), and I think the US would rather have the FAB buy some F-16’s.
this nis interesting, I know a few people here where I’ll be at the HARS airshow today that would be interested in having this in the collection, going to add it to my ebay items so that I can send it on to them. Thanks.
Hmmmmm I think people are starting to realise that the F-35 program is a bit beyond all possibilities of reality, it’s just not possible (nor is it highly improbilible – just for all of us HHG2G fans, hello were ever you are I want you to know that you are not welcome at all).
Vamping up a successful design is always a good idea but then again, you can exceed it’s limits (refer the F-5/F-20 design history). The F-16 is now starting to get beyond it’s limits, I feel it’s gone about as far as it can go, the only logical answer in the US market now seems to be the Bugs, these haven’t really gone very far from their initial design back in the 70’s. Why not start looking into conformal tanks and added extras for this machine. I seriously doubt that the RAAF would go for it, we can’t wait to get rid of this damd machine. Spain might buy some as might the Kuwaiti’s and Malaysians and as for Canada, if they have any money soon for defence, it will be a miracle! They are starting to take the former Irish view on defence, “we have a big neighboure, besides if we keep quiet then we won’t get attacked. Canada is having far too much trouble with it’s Sub program to start thinking of replacing it’s fighter element, besides, it’s the army’s turn not to get it’s toys, the airforce have to wait another fie-ten years.
Oh and Arthur: “this-time-it-will-really-be-Super-i-promise-Hornet”, I love it mate, hope you don’t mind if I use it around here.
IIRC aren’t they pressing ahead with this design to surpass many of the other designs as well? Weren’t there going to be an eventual total of 88 of these vessels?
Maybe I’m just getting old and sanity is starting to slip.
Some how I think Panther wasn’t talking about big bombers or MPA’s.
Anyway the RAAF has PC-9A/A(M)’s and these are equiped with all manner of light arms.
Well G/l with it mate, hope you do well.
Just wish I could get my degree in Advanced Sea Warfare and applied topology. meh oh well!
Maybe I should move over to the States
Well there is their solution to the FX problem- delay it for a few more years mean time lease something similar to what to what you have in your inventory (since the FAB have Mirage III’s the flight characteristics would be very similar- thus training would follow along similar lines).
Well the Us is cutting back since they are trying to find more fund for both the War on Terror and Iraq, base closures are put of it’s solutions