dark light

Ja Worsley

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 3,659 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Fleet Command Ship #2066133
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Ugly and overloaded with a multitude of weapon systems. Hideous! Yuck!

    Which vessel are you talking about Wan?

    in reply to: Kanimbla's New Guns #2066134
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    F-111: Mate we are not going to get a third LHD. We will however get the air componant, I have been hearing this for some time and have been trying to let everyone know this but few people believe it (understandably).

    The plan has been to retire the LPA’s and the LSH when the LHD’s come on line, and then replace HMAS Success with a common design vessel based on the superstructure of the LHD’s.

    Oh and don’t dismiss any of the other navies amphibious capabilities in our region.

    Indonesia has four LPD’s.
    http://bp1.blogger.com/_ihMIxc-p4ac/Ru69DIVZMtI/AAAAAAAAAHI/en0UZZVUNMs/s400/kri+surabaya02.jpg

    New Zealand has Canterbury which is actually proving to be very successful.
    http://img.scoop.co.nz/stories/images/0706/65c5099f7e7e948b3a73.jpeg

    And Singapore has their very capable Endurance class vessels.
    http://pages.intnet.mu/warbirds/warships/Endeavour0.jpg

    in reply to: Taiwanese "naval vessel runs aground" in Typhoon Jangmi? #2066175
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Here we see the problem with “Stealth”- hide everything behind a wall, cover the wall in RAM and you’re protected, problem is, the wall doesn’t stand up to the weather! Wind blows against a wall, the wall resists and the vessel is then pushed off course, too bad if you are near any cliffs or a beach.

    in reply to: Kanimbla's New Guns #2066194
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    HMAS Tobruk differed in many way to the RN Round Table series. For one we had a huge 70 tonne Derrick on our vessel that out did the RN models Crane systems which could only lift up to 40 tonnes. We also had a major hospital unit on board our ship which included Dental and x-ray facilities and a 50 bed recovery ward (The RN vessels had minimal hospital facilities and instead of a recovery ward they used this space for extra troops). Tobruk even has one level removed off the top where the flight deck is… observe:

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/cf/RFA_Sir_Lancelot.San_Carlos_Water.1982.jpg
    RFA Sir Lancelot

    http://www.ussubsint.com/Graphics/HMAS%20TOBRUK.jpg
    HMAS Tobruk, note the height of the funnel compared to the pic of Lancelot and also the derrick

    Yes it was just after the Falklands that the RN wanted our ship, sadly for them we decided to keep it, We could have done a deal where we got the carrier and they got Tobruk, oh well that’s politics for you.

    I am intregued though, you guys refer to the Round Table’s as LSL’s, our Tobruk is actually an LSH Landing Ship Heavy.

    in reply to: Taiwanese "naval vessel runs aground" in Typhoon Jangmi? #2066628
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Slightly better pic

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/98/Kwang_Hua_VI_After_Typhoon.jpg/800px-Kwang_Hua_VI_After_Typhoon.jpg

    in reply to: Kanimbla's New Guns #2066639
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Dis: Mate these are Mini Typhoon guns (12.75mm aka .50Cal). The Typhoon gun is a 25mm weapon and arms our Huon and Armidale class vessels. The crew served .50 Cals are the M2 standard Brownings which are still being made today despite having entered service just prior to WWII. The reason we still have these weapons on all vessels is because they offer stability in a weapons platform, ease of maintanence and the best durability in any weapon ever made (well that is the official stand point I was told back in my service days).

    Stevo: Mate I wouldn’t be too suprised that the LPA’s we have are still kept on the books for a little longer- They have proven themselves and have made other services envious of the capabilities that these vessels offer (including the USN where they originally came from). I also foresee that some other navy might make an offer for them as has been made with Tobruk in the past with the RN and MdB both asking if we’d sell her. Can you think of any navy in our region who would want these vessels? I know I can name a few, and if I go further afield I bet I could come up with at least 20 navies who would want our LPA’s.

    Pioneer: Mate you are too optimistic, The “Cloud Punchers” (RBS-70 crews) do deploy all the time when the LPA’s and Fleet Auxilleries deploy to the MEAO.

    in reply to: A case for ultra small 'carriers'..? #2066763
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Jonsey: Mate I was talking about the flight characteristics in performance. And the addition of the Searchwater system would actually incure a pressurised cabin then becoming standard. Heck the only reason the current cabin configuration is non pressurised is because they use them mainly for rapid troop deployment- much the same as the CH-46 was used.

    While the Merlin does have the bigger cabin area, the time on station does seem to be the critical factor here. Add to this the- as mentioned addition of ECM and Jamming gear for strike support and the Merlin’s performance then becomes useless (Helo’s can not match the fast flight performance of combat jets, and any ideas of launching a helo before you send in the strike element is just plan ludicrous- makes for it being a target above everything else and also gives warning of an impending strike if people know what to look for).

    The UAV idea is fundamently a better solution but as we know, people in the loop is better in a strike situation for the simple reason that if anything goes wrong, we can fix it enroute or even call off the strike.

    in reply to: A case for ultra small 'carriers'..? #2066788
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Kev: Yes these are still ideas in someones head but with the RN buying Ski jump equipped Carriers and the Seaking AEW MK.7 needing replacement in the not too distant future it does seem logical. The AEW Merlin is the other option for the RN but if you weigh up performance factors of Merlin over Osprey, the V-22 comes out the major winner. Add to this the recent successful deployment to Iraq of the V-22 and you can see that it won’t be long before other uses for the machine become reality as do other nations interest. I can only vouch for Australia here but we have been watching the whole Osprey program for a number of years and are interested in buying the machine. Multiple versions of the plane makes sence from a pure business perspective.

    Kato: Mate I doubt any other country will buy the Raf for operations off Carriers, they are having troubler as it is selling the land version. In the past five years I have heard a number of claims that it has been bought by various countries only to see that France is still the only operator. If anyone is to buy the Raf it will be the USN for DACT just like what they did with the F-21’s (IAI Kfir C.2’s) and they will only lease a dozen or buy a small number, say 6- nothing to get excited about.

    Swerve: You are correct buddy, Brazil does indeed have a load of cash floating around, their problem, is investing it wisely. Half their fleet needs to be retired and half their ideas need to be discarded. One idea that they have which I understand but can’t how they are going to pull it off is… nuclear powered subs. These complex machines need respect.

    Harry: Mate any current LHD design, including the MRD design could theoretically carry through to a STOVL design, the question is would the country opting for that design then pay for the extra design and modification to exisiting designs for this type of work?

    Star: Mate those articles aren’t exactly right, I have friends over in Brazil that are telling me things way different to what is in those pieces of news you quoted. If Brazil is still so poor, why is Russia so keen to tap the Brazilian market? Truth is, Brazil does indeed have a very strong ecconomic stand point these days- due mainly to the up turn in copper trade and also the recent Tropical unrest here in Australia that wiped out our Banana crops which Brazil was able to capitalise on.

    in reply to: A case for ultra small 'carriers'..? #2066885
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Well i feel that there is a clear case for them especially if countries such as Argentina, Brazil and Thailand decide to start up their naval aviation strike capacity again!

    in reply to: Fleet Command Ship #2066895
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    While this does boarder on the edge of pure fantasy, it is a good chance to point out the capabilities of certain other vessels out there that do fill this role!

    Yes I agree that vessels such as what you are proposing would be very costly, not to mention very top heavy, other such vessels already in fleet service do happen to fill this role quiet easily and at a huge fraction of the price you are looking at.

    Absalon class command and support ship
    This idea was instilled when the Danish Navy opted for two new vessels capable of just such a role, the command facilities in these vessels is comparable to any in the USN.

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c7/Absalon.jpg/800px-Absalon.jpg

    Now the weapons systems may be a little on the light side compared to what you have in mind, they are capable and adequate for the job and should the need arise, you can add more.

    Endurance class
    These LST vessels of the RSN do hold a very capable Command and Control division in them. Again the weapons are a little on the light side for such a role, but that can be fixed especially if you cut down on the LST role by 50% if not remove it all together!

    http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=22926&d=1172106579

    Of course there are other vessels out there that could do the job easily and at a vastly smaller amount than what you proposed perhaps a clear line of thought needs to be entailed here before you jump into something ridiculous!

    in reply to: A case for ultra small 'carriers'..? #2066928
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Throwing my thoughts into the mix here, I have been looking into small carriers for some time now. As you all are aware, the RAN are getting two Juan Carlos I class vessels, there was talk at the time (which I still support) for buying one of these vessels and three smaller LHT’s (Light Helo Transports). I have seen an InCat design (which I can find no more info on and my personal preference), and an Austral design (slightly bigger).

    Both designs are centered around a catamaran hull, the Austral design as you can see, does cater for F-35 ops, the InCat design could with a slight expansion.

    After having spent time out there in the fleet I can offer my insights on this matter.

    A small carrier could be effective in low risk areas of operations or in small “Commando style” strikes. This would entail the following:

    [INDENT]

    • Strike Aircraft (STOVL or VSTOL)- 6
    • Resuce/ General Duties Helo- 2
    • AWACS- 2

    [/INDENT]

    This is how I break down a mission; 2 Planes for the strike mission (given the level of technology involved in strike weapons these days, this should be enough), while two go on CAP with an AWACS plane, this ensures that the strike package is undetected inbound and outbound and should retribution follow-the CAP planes can take care of them. One Plane sits on alert, this is a back up for the two on CAP, this leaves the last one down for maintanence. The second AWACS is the back up for the one on patrol and then there the two GD/SAR helos.

    Combat Element
    Given that the only aircraft available for the role is the F-35B There is no other option here.

    AEWAC Element
    I thought about the options here and the V-22 is probably the best option here. I looked at the different versions (the one with the Triangular radar, the option with the Erieye Radar and all other options), but I have decided that the best option would be the Searchwater equiped version (pictured below). The reason is that the radar folds in to the cabin behind and the basic config is not changed at all (height, weight, flight performance). These planes could also fly in close with a strike package and back out, the thought here is that they could also be stocked with ECM and Jamming gear to help hide the strike package!

    General Duties/ SAR Element
    Finally to save on space, which on a vessel this size would be at a premium, I’d have the A-109E’s as the GD/ SAR helos. Their performance and capabilities are well known in the industry.

    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Are you serious? Great news, I always thought that the Singaporean Endeavour class ships had so much potential, I thought that it would have won the MPV design for RNZN’s Project protector but oh well. This is great news and Thailand is certainly coming a long way with it’s defence.

    in reply to: Guess the Ship- Past Navy #2070928
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Ok guys, here are the results for the last three…

    2. USS Melville (Destroyer Tender)

    3. HMAS Norman (N Class Destroyer)

    4. HMS Albatross (Sea Plane Carrier- formerly HMAS Albatross, given over to the Royal Navy as part payment for the Light Crusiers the RAN bought).

    in reply to: Guess the Ship- Modern Navy #2070930
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Ok well since there are no final bids, here is the last vessel….

    LE Eithne of the Irish Republic Naval Forces, this vessel is due for replacement and is the largest vessel in this service and the only vessel in the service with organic air cover.

    I’m busy all this week, tune in next week for the next game!

    in reply to: Guess the Ship- Modern Navy #2071144
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Wan: Not bad for our Armidale Classes little brothers are they 😉 I like the twin 25mm gun on the front backed up with the two .50cals aft of the bridge. If you go to the Austral website you can see the specs for these vessels- they are rather impressive!

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 3,659 total)