Harry: mate the Mk-20/30’s are being offered to the military to replace Jet trainers and light combat aircraft, the US Department of Homeland Security is considering this jet for defence of Cities in the advent of another attack using airliners (this is how the Mk-30 was actually born). They expect to strap an ASRAAM to each wing and perhaps two small guns to bring down terrorist planes before they strike home.
the whole scheme developed after the Bede BD-10 (big brother to the Bede BD-5J famous in James Bond films for flying out of the back of a horse trailer) fell through, this plane uses some of the same designs from that aircraft. It was and still is intended for the civilian market, but there are also applications for the military market- in fact on military user has just bought 20?
Meat: I expect that the canopy design will change some what since this is the first plane to fly (thus is testing everything). I do know however that the canopy is a single aft hinged hydrolic/spring one piece system bringing it in line with bigger planes like the F-15 and F/A-18B/D/F
Ah yes I think I remember Sudan getting some Mig 27’s from Libya or somewhere like that!
Ok let me clarrify a couple of points here:
1. We ordered the S-70B-2 version of the Seahawk which is a Roll Adaptive Weapons System (RAWS; look up in the Archive of this forum and you’ll see I did a thread some time ago about RAWS over LAMPS). This order for an initial 8 was in responce to the RAN buying four Perry Class Frigates. We later ordered two more ships and 8 more Seahawks. At the time we had to buy the S-70 versions because there was no export licence granted for the S-60 versions (this came later). It was thought that the S-70 was a downrated version of the S-60’s but in fact the S-70 series has been proven to be far superior to the US models. The High operational tempo of our Seahawks has seen them used in all parts of the world for more reasons than could be thought of by Michael Jackson for him being in bed with little boys.
2. The Order for the SH-2G(A)’s was placed at the same time as the order for the MEKO-200ANZ (Later called the Anzac class). The first 11 were to man 10 ships (later down graded to 8)and having one spare after development trials. The OPV dealwas to have seen the first 11 suplemented with a further 20 machines (another reason for buying second hand re-vamped models, keeping the cost down in order to buy more airframes). Since the deal fell through with Malaysia and no other partner could be found, the whole deal fell through and we were stuck with these 11. During the course of the development of the weapons intergration, the RAN were tasked with sending ships up to the Gulf for patrol duties- we couldn’t send the Anzacs with no credible Air Support (as it was they were being used as training decks with Squirells), so a plan was instituted to investigate wether the Seahawks could operate on the Anzacs- the initial thought (that these machines were to big and heavy to operate of the deck) being blown out of the water- no pun intended- on the first day of the trial and thus when HMAS Anzac sailed for the Gulf, she took with her an 816Sqdn Seahawk. Thus we have managed to get by without the SH-2G’s.
3. The Visby Class Corvettes will have a hanger, unfortunately it will not be below decks but intergrated in a redesign of the aft section incorperating the Hanger aft of the bridge. I found this out via Papa Lima and another former member of this forum both in Sweden.
4. The SH-2G is a damd good platform, it’s the Australian Government and RAN trying to stuff far too much into such a cramped machine that is causing the problems. Reducing the Three man crew to a Two man crew and adding highly automated computer equipment into the airframe has proven onceand for all that each design has it’s technological design limit. It’s good to see that the other four countries have not had any problems with theirs and that they are all working well as they were designed to.
5. Australia has not lost any Seahawks to my knowledge, the recent crash off the coast of Fiji was infact an Army Blackhawk with an Army crew. This has caused concern in the Army Aviation circles (5th Regiment) as this is yet another Black Hawk disaster and we are loosing them far too quickly. This has prompted a speed up of the replacement MRH-90’s entry into service with the Army.
Bronco: mate there has always been a sentiment towards the RAAF buying some A-400’s right back to when it was called the Future Large Aircraft. Wether we buy some now is another question but I have some friends in the Air Force that still talk as though we are going to buy them one day.
Personally with the C-13J-30’s and the C-17’s now in service, i don’t see a need for the A-400 down here. But we do need at least two more C-17’s
What is the status of the Mig-27 world wide? IIRC only the SLAF has any in service (though I could be mistaken)
So, if Norway decide to invest more money into the project, they will face the risk of paying 5 billion NOK in case they wish to pull out of the JSF partnership? All this before they have decided to actually purchase the JSF? What kind of deal is that, I donยดt get the logic! Can anyone explain, please?
Happy to, it’s a cash cusion that was written into all contracts by the US to safe guard them incase anyone pulled out. If you pull out, others will have to pay more, therefore you should pay a penalty fee to ease this burden on the other partners. It also helps keep the project going while they look for another partner to step up to the plate so to speak.
If you ask me, the only ones doing really well out of the Lightning program are the US! They got everyone to invest in it, then told everyone that they aren’t going to get the full spec systems and now they say that if anyone pulls out, they have to pay more money than staying in it. Personally i’d back out and take to US to court over the whole affair and get my money back since I won’t be getting what I paid for nor what I was promissed!
Bronco: mate seriously, I too would have prefered the An-124 but I think what we did was the right decision, I don’t like buying too much from one country, but in this case, it is the only choice and it has the accredited point feasible for service (the main one being ready now when we need them). Yes I think the colour scheme is dull and boring, wish they had of kept 36Sqdn’s bush camo, perhaps I could persuade someone on the “What If” forum to do a C-17 in the bush camo ๐
Bager1968: I think this order was put through a little too late down here mate, I mean those eight elephants from Thailand have alread arrived here ๐
d’clacy: Hey old friend, nice to see you again. I didn’t avoid the topic, just forgot to answer, *the answer is Y**** I*** T*** H*** Hmmm we seem to be having troubles with the internet here, I guess I’d better get off and let the techies know :diablo: :dev2: :diablo:
*Reference to Chevy Chase’s character Emmit Fitzhume in Spys Like Us
It should have been destroyed but save the plane, just kill the polliticians :diablo:
The Cunard Container Ship “Atlantic Conveyor”
Aircraft/helicopter support ship “Atlantic Conveyor”
practising Sea Harrier landings before sailing south

Not the containers forming walls offering some protection

The support ship Atlantic Conveyor carried a number of British aircraft and helicopters to the Falklands. (Again notic the walls and in this shot you can see how the harriers were able to be used even during the Ferry trip
Would you like to know MORE?
Swerve; mate some very interesting point there, worthy of praise :dev2:
Firstly the E-2’s on that design, yes I am sure of it, look at the proposal and do a bit of research on it’s history. The Spanish wanted an AWACS plane way back and at the time the Hawkeye was the only one available.
Secondly, the Vikings: Yes there are some around (Wish I owned one as I love these planes). They have three different types sitting in AMRAC- S-2A/B, CS-2 and finally the ES-2. An AWACS conversion of an ES-2 would not be far out of the imagination, especially with the Erieye radar system with or with out consols in it. As for it being compatible on decks, well the Viking to my suprise, is lighter than a SuE! Then there is the EV-22 that has been floating around for some time as a proposal (I really must dig that article up again). In reguards to what sized deck you’d need, well the E-2 was able to operate of the CdG and the extentions were only a safety factor. But the smallest size that would be praticle would most definatly be the BAN Sao Paolo (ex Foch), it did play with Hornets at one time and a few other planes.
The Hawk would make a great navy jet, but you forgot the Su-25UBK, it too would make a great strike plane from a carrier. As for small buzz birds, think abouut a naval Javelin ๐
Turbinia: I know all too well my friend about the Merchies not being up to military standard, I lost a very good friend in the fire on HMAS Westralia and the less said about the former HMNZS Charles Upham, the better.
As a matter of fact, yes they did, that was the reason, odd how I forgot that, old age and too many pretty young women in my movie ๐
Turbinia: Yes they are susseptable to damage, but the shere fact that these vessels are in and out of dry dock faster than a ferarri at a Formula 1 race with the dings and dents fixed up tells you that they can handle it. I wouldn’t be too suprised if an ADCAP went straight through one without exploding and still looked for a target to hit.
The Main deck is a null and void part of the equation, ever heard of the MAC ships of WWII?

HMS Empire MacAlpine.
Notice the flight deck? Notice how there is no Island? and with todays technology we really don’t need an island structure. Besides even if you did have a block island running across the beam, VSTOL doesn’t need a runway nor do Helos or Ospreys or for that matter BA-609’s
Click here for more on the MAC ships of WWII or read “Jane’s WARSHIPS of World War II buy Collins Publications
Yeah that’s right Swerve, The NSM is a great choice for the Gripen- who knows, perhaps if the NSM is intergrated on the G-N, the RNZAF might even buy a dozen or so and restart their Combat Air Wing.
Another thought about the NSM- it might be just the right size to be intergrated on the Javelin under the center line station, offering customers with Early Hawks and Alpha’s a great replacement choice in the Trainer/Light Attack role! ๐ฎ
Where are you based Sam? I watch the news where I am religiously (drives my missus spare) and I never saw it on any channel