dark light

Ja Worsley

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 3,659 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: WWII Insect Class #2039374
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    I’d be interested in seeing those pics mate, do you have a scanner and if so could you email them to me please? [email]Ja.Worsley@gmail.com[/email]

    You mention the travels up the Yangtse, would that happen to be around the time of the Japanese invassion of Manchuria?

    in reply to: Israeli warship 'badly damaged' by 'explosive drone' #2047963
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    JonS: mate I had forgotten about that, thanks for the reality check! But still my point stands about Iran and their actions recently haven’t had any calming effect, they have still yet to come out and deny any involvment. As I said to my dear friend over in Israel: “The Iranian’s haven’t forgotten the Osirak Affair, and knowing how arab’s work, they circle and cirle a problem, let it die down over time and them bam they hit you when you least expect it.” this os probably why Iran haven’t said anything, they have felt threatened lately what with the world commenting on their Nuke program, this time they are hitting Israel before Israel hits them.

    in reply to: The 8000t "harrier carrier" concept? #2047967
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Turbina: Mate it might interest you to know that the IDF has an Island base just off the coast of Somalia, it’s a former Soviet base that is now run but the Israeli’s though the land is still owned by Somalia and they pay for it each year.

    To say that they lack expiditionary warfare experience is not entirely accurate. Each year they hold excercises in which they practice sailing down to this island and raiding it, the people on the island practice defending it so there is a huge precedence here for such a role. A small Carrier in the class of Chakri Narubet does tend to make sence now as does F-35B’s in IDF/AF service, still since they receive their anual defence budget from the US as an aid package, I think it would be more up to America to allow the IDF/N to have such a vessel in service.

    in reply to: South Africa's Air Force receives its first Gripen #2564728
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Wow it’s about time too, they took long enough to get them.

    in reply to: Israeli warship 'badly damaged' by 'explosive drone' #2048197
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    I was just talking with a friend of mine in Israel and she has just lost a friend in the recent actions.

    It is clear that someone is supplying very very sophisticated arms to the Hezbollah and also training them in counter insurgency warfare, the use of IED’s will come into play soon as the Army move north to secure Lebanon.

    I agree with the Arab council that Peace has failed in the Middle East, someone over there wants the whole region to destablise into chaos. Afghanistan has renewed violence, Iraq is a mess and now Israel just as a Palistinian state was about to be set up. Ten years ago under the leadership of Bill Clinton, the US set up peace deals with all Arab members then fighting, to lay down their arms, today George Bush said that he is not going to tell Israel how to defend itself, how ironic, you’ll do it for other countries George but not Israel. I loved Putin’s little snide comment about democracy in Iraq, it was well put and shows how educated he really is. TBH, the biggest problem in the middle east has been other countries interfering with local politics- France, the US, the UK even Russia. Perhaps what we all should do is let them be, let them sort it out and if they want something, then we can provide, not force our way in.

    in reply to: Question about the Su-34 #2565177
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Garry: mate you know there has always been a lot of tention between Jakarta and Canberra, the two countries will never see eye to eye, they are from two totally opposing positions on the religious scale and as we all know religion makes up a huge portion of both social and government standings.

    Our allience with America stems from the fact that they are the global police man and that we can get spares from them no matter where we are in the world because they are usually there as well. This is what has prompted the decissions to buy the M-1A-1’s, the various ships and sensor systems, missiles, even certain firearms.

    Years ago we bought mainly British equipement for much the same reason, now it’s from America, if America is replaced as the global policman then I am sure that you will find we will buy the next major powers equipment. Logistically is it a sound ideal. I do hope and wish that the governemt here soon sees the errors of what they are doing, and that they fix them before the mistakes are made, but that’s up to both the public and the Department of Defence DMO to decide.

    in reply to: RNZAF Update please #2565499
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Mate that’s very interesting, they are only getting 8 MRH-90, can I ask what your source is on that because the RNZAF are still quoting a 14 ship order.

    in reply to: RNZAF Update please #2565641
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Thanks for that Turbo; since we are building their MRH-90’s as well as our own ones, maybe some sort of a discount could be worked out for a huge purchace of the 14 larger and 10 smaller helos required (they are still after 10 of the light helo’s right)?

    I heard that they wanted twin engined models which is why they ruled out the EC-120’s what’s brought it back into contention?

    ***edit***
    Will some of these new training machines be deployed at sea on the MRV to gain Seatime flight hours like what out Squirrels are in the RAN? Thus need to have some marinisation done to them and also some form of anti corrosion protection which is why there is a hold up in the decission and also why the smaller machine has been brought back into contention.

    in reply to: The 8000t "harrier carrier" concept? #2048500
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Tiddles: Mate the hanger deck is part of the transport deck and occupies the forward section of it, HH-3H’s are easily accomidated in there and are capable of fitting on the lift- though for more troop movement you would have either three AB-139’s or five AB-212’s instead of the two HH-3H’s. Interestingly enough, on the San Marco, the forward and aft deck spots are for EH-101’s but these machines are too big to fit on the lift or inside the ship, so I guess that in times of war, these ships would be in company with one of the two carriers.

    I still think that Italy should finish the San Gustino in the same configuration as the other two san class vessels giving a fleet commonality, but I think the Oto gun on the forward deck is a clear statment that this vessel is a self contained unit capable of all methods of breaching beach heads in one hull rather than needing support of other units like the other two. I was sure that there were originally four San units but I can’t see any reference to the last one (San Gustino, San Gregorio and San Marco).

    Turbina: Mate like a lot of the IDF/N’s plans, they have to be put on hold, Currently the IDF/N is buying two new Type 212/214’s to supplement it’s fleet of Three Dolphin class SSK’s. A replacement for the Sa’ar 4.5’s has just been released and rhoumor has it that they are looking at the Formidable class FFG’s that the RSN has just received. The Eliat class (Sa’ar 5’s) are also going to be replaces as the IDF/N has had so much trouble with this class particularly in seakeeping (very top heavy and roll too much).

    in reply to: The 8000t "harrier carrier" concept? #2048646
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Just looking at the San class ships (more specifically the San Marco with the mods applied) and I was wondering if this type of vessel could actually be a contender for a “Mini Carrier” role? I know it has a small hanger for only two helo’s but what if the base design was re worked and the Amphibious role deleted, would it be a contender? How many Harriers (Or the like) do you think you could fit on this type of vessel? Obviously the deck space will have to be increased slightly as will the lift.

    http://www.marina.difesa.it/unita/pagine/navi/sanmarco/images/sanmarco1.jpg

    in reply to: The 8000t "harrier carrier" concept? #2048648
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Tiddles: mate we had that design on this forum before. The 963CV was to have operated VSTOL S-3 Viking sized aircraft that never materialised. Go back to page tow of that “Small Carriers” thread.

    Here are the pics though:
    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=77088

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=116680

    in reply to: The 8000t "harrier carrier" concept? #2048669
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    I wish I could find info on some of these proposals, not the ones that were build but the ones that weren’t.

    As it stands the RAN had accepted HMS Ark Royal as the Melbourne replacement, sadly the Argies put paid to our replacement carrier plans and we never took the American option of a Wasp Class because it was far too expencive at the time. In hind sight, we should have taken the Wasp it would have been the best option especially with the recent disaster relief missions we’ve been doing lately.

    in reply to: New Austral Proposal #2048679
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Sadly I have to agree with you Steve, the British government are more worried these days about spending money in any area than actually buying things they need, not only in defence but even the Police and other services- look at the case of the London Bombers, they knew who they were but didn’t watch them because they didn’t have the funding for the man power.

    I see the British government as a modern day Ebeneezer Scrooge, hording money in private places and letting no one touch it for any reason. If England wants to stay alive as a country, then they are going to have to wake up to the facts that things cost money. You need to spend it in order to make it, that’s the nature of ecconomics.

    in reply to: New Austral Proposal #2048767
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Anyhow where would an Australian Corvette be carrying a small cargo of trucks or jeeps.

    Tiddles: mate how about initial disaster relief efforts? one of these MRC’s could be on station inside a couple of days with a follow up force of the LHD’s and the right equipment (as opposed to the general stores shipped currently)- this would have the advantage of effiency and productivity rather than comeing back home with store left over that were not needed.

    I do see a place for these ships in any major Blue Water fleet, even to some degree a Green Water fleet, but they most definately do need something bigger on them in terms of eapon systems.

    in reply to: First french Horizon frigate at sea #2049026
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Hey Wan, mate back in the 30’s this guy built a sub that could fly, it could only submerge to conning tower but could fly to 9000ft and had a top speed of 130mph.

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 3,659 total)