dark light

Al

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,441 through 1,455 (of 1,560 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Civilian aircraft in military use #2390271
    Al
    Participant

    I wonder just how many military guises the Boeing 707 has had?
    http://i292.photobucket.com/albums/mm14/handshifterAl/CF-5s.jpg?t=1270545073
    and the DC-3!
    http://i292.photobucket.com/albums/mm14/handshifterAl/DanC47.jpg?t=1270545161

    in reply to: Civilian aircraft in military use #2390279
    Al
    Participant

    USAF CT39G 159363 of VR-24, based on the Rockwell model 65 Sabreliner…
    http://i292.photobucket.com/albums/mm14/handshifterAl/Sabreliner.jpg?t=1270543432
    US Naval Oceanographic Office RP-3A 149667 ‘El Coyote’ of Project Seascan, of course based on the Lockheed Electra…
    http://i292.photobucket.com/albums/mm14/handshifterAl/ElCoyote.jpg?t=1270543660
    US Navy C-131F 141023, based on the Convair CV-240/340/440 series…
    http://i292.photobucket.com/albums/mm14/handshifterAl/C-131F.jpg?t=1270544169
    CAF Canadair CP-107 Argus, based on the Bristol Brittania…
    http://i292.photobucket.com/albums/mm14/handshifterAl/Argus.jpg?t=1270544777

    in reply to: Civilian aircraft in military use #2390308
    Al
    Participant

    Other frequent Lossiemouth & Kinloss visitors in the 1970s & 1980s – US Army C-12C Huron 73-22255, based on the Beechcraft Super King Air…
    http://i292.photobucket.com/albums/mm14/handshifterAl/C-12C.jpg?t=1270542858
    USAF C-12 Huron 73-1211, which crashed killing 5 occupants in Iran 31.01.79…
    http://i292.photobucket.com/albums/mm14/handshifterAl/Beechcraft.jpg?t=1270543008
    and US Army U-21A Ute 18091 (now N7112T) based on the Beechcraft A90 King Air
    http://i292.photobucket.com/albums/mm14/handshifterAl/U-21.jpg?t=1270543287

    in reply to: Aeronut's puzzle picture #1124536
    Al
    Participant

    Nose down prop?

    in reply to: General Discussion #311521
    Al
    Participant

    Here we have Brown, Cameron and Clegg as the centerpieces of ‘British’ politics, and typically no mention of the SNP, the governing party of an entire nation north of the border, whose constituents will be voting in the election.
    Disregarded as usual – no wonder more and more Scots want a divorce from the UK!

    in reply to: Election called in the UK. #1897819
    Al
    Participant

    Here we have Brown, Cameron and Clegg as the centerpieces of ‘British’ politics, and typically no mention of the SNP, the governing party of an entire nation north of the border, whose constituents will be voting in the election.
    Disregarded as usual – no wonder more and more Scots want a divorce from the UK!

    in reply to: General Discussion #311524
    Al
    Participant

    According to this article ( all right, I know it’s the Daily Mail ) , humans actually have a part of the brain that pre-disposes them to believe in ” something “. Possibly that part’s more developed in some people than others.

    The whole point of the article is that the urge to ‘believe’ is primordial – something deep from our evolutionary past. Perhaps we will evolve a little more to cast off that emotional crutch altogether.
    Christianity is simply another in a long line of primitive superstitions – just a more streamlined progression from having a cumbersome plethora of different Gods for every occasion.
    Maybe it’s my pagan Pictish heritage, but the idea of worshipping sun, fire and water Gods seems slightly less ridiculous to me – at least I know that I would surely die without them…

    in reply to: Christ was short and swarthy #1897820
    Al
    Participant

    According to this article ( all right, I know it’s the Daily Mail ) , humans actually have a part of the brain that pre-disposes them to believe in ” something “. Possibly that part’s more developed in some people than others.

    The whole point of the article is that the urge to ‘believe’ is primordial – something deep from our evolutionary past. Perhaps we will evolve a little more to cast off that emotional crutch altogether.
    Christianity is simply another in a long line of primitive superstitions – just a more streamlined progression from having a cumbersome plethora of different Gods for every occasion.
    Maybe it’s my pagan Pictish heritage, but the idea of worshipping sun, fire and water Gods seems slightly less ridiculous to me – at least I know that I would surely die without them…

    in reply to: General Discussion #311525
    Al
    Participant

    But because God is not behaving as we think a God should, does not prove that he is not there.

    If God doesn’t behave like we think he should, why on earth would you have him around? It’s a bit like asking Ted Bundy to look after your little sister…

    in reply to: Christ was short and swarthy #1897824
    Al
    Participant

    But because God is not behaving as we think a God should, does not prove that he is not there.

    If God doesn’t behave like we think he should, why on earth would you have him around? It’s a bit like asking Ted Bundy to look after your little sister…

    in reply to: Civilian aircraft in military use #2390739
    Al
    Participant

    Al, thanks for the pic, what was the Constellation used for? Looks like a SIGINT or command post? Any details as to what kind of equipment was housed in those fairings?

    141292 has seen better days – a sad end to an awesome aircraft.
    VAQ-33 was tactical electronic warfare squadron – there is an account of this aircraft’s 150+ antenna here:
    http://www.reenactor.net/vaq-33/connie.html
    http://i292.photobucket.com/albums/mm14/handshifterAl/BuccNC121K.jpg?t=1270503837

    in reply to: General Discussion #311543
    Al
    Participant

    If evidence is what you want, the preponderance is definitely in God’s favor.
    Do you really think that all the beauty around in nature came from some ooze, that came from some big bang, that came from something else? Do you see proof of Evolution taking place around you?
    Ryan

    Beauty is in the eye of the beholder – something is beautiful only because our evolved brains considerate it to be beautiful. A dog could walk past the Mona Lisa every day for a million years, and never see anything other than something else to **** on. Even pond slime is beautiful to some people.
    Of course there is obvious proof of Darwin’s theories of evolution and survival of the fittest – it works by genetic mutation and multiplication.
    Take the African elephant, and the Scottish wildcat for instance. Big game hunters and Victorian taxidermists wanted the very biggest specimens possible of both these species, and killed so many that the ‘big’ gene was entirely eradicated from the gene pool. As a result, the largest elephant tusks are less than half the length and weight they were 150 years ago, and similarly wildcats four feet long were common 150 years ago, whereas the modern wildcat is considered large at 30 inches long.
    These were caused by human interaction of course, but mother nature can cause similar genetic crises. I wonder just how many scientists believe that the ‘heavens and the earth’ were created in six days?

    in reply to: Christ was short and swarthy #1897872
    Al
    Participant

    If evidence is what you want, the preponderance is definitely in God’s favor.
    Do you really think that all the beauty around in nature came from some ooze, that came from some big bang, that came from something else? Do you see proof of Evolution taking place around you?
    Ryan

    Beauty is in the eye of the beholder – something is beautiful only because our evolved brains considerate it to be beautiful. A dog could walk past the Mona Lisa every day for a million years, and never see anything other than something else to **** on. Even pond slime is beautiful to some people.
    Of course there is obvious proof of Darwin’s theories of evolution and survival of the fittest – it works by genetic mutation and multiplication.
    Take the African elephant, and the Scottish wildcat for instance. Big game hunters and Victorian taxidermists wanted the very biggest specimens possible of both these species, and killed so many that the ‘big’ gene was entirely eradicated from the gene pool. As a result, the largest elephant tusks are less than half the length and weight they were 150 years ago, and similarly wildcats four feet long were common 150 years ago, whereas the modern wildcat is considered large at 30 inches long.
    These were caused by human interaction of course, but mother nature can cause similar genetic crises. I wonder just how many scientists believe that the ‘heavens and the earth’ were created in six days?

    in reply to: General Discussion #311677
    Al
    Participant

    it’s inconceivable to me that something as complex as the human soul doesn’t survive in some way.

    Just because we’ve evolved enough to be able to think we are complex, doesn’t mean we are!

    in reply to: Christ was short and swarthy #1897927
    Al
    Participant

    it’s inconceivable to me that something as complex as the human soul doesn’t survive in some way.

    Just because we’ve evolved enough to be able to think we are complex, doesn’t mean we are!

Viewing 15 posts - 1,441 through 1,455 (of 1,560 total)