dark light

OneLeft

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 1,009 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Man 23rd Aug 2008! #492043
    OneLeft
    Participant

    It’ll have been the JFK then, you must have just missed me.

    Thanks,

    1L.

    in reply to: Spotting at LGW, southside (rather urgent) #513573
    OneLeft
    Participant

    BAA airports are not designed for hanging around landside.

    The idea is you check in and head through security. Once through security at T5 you enter a whole new fantasy world of retail and dining where you could easily forget you are on your way to a flight.

    Hope you enjoyed LGW.

    1L.

    in reply to: Man 23rd Aug 2008! #492211
    OneLeft
    Participant

    UPS, do you know if the BA 767 was the JFK or the delayed 0815 LHR?

    1L.

    in reply to: Spotting at LGW, southside (rather urgent) #513899
    OneLeft
    Participant

    But it is walkable…

    Not sure I could be bothered walking it myself, far too far.

    Personally I’d call a local taxi company (never use the airport taxi company!) to collect me from Concorde House and take me to The Flight Tavern pub. Then I’d have a pint, then I’d walk round to the end of 08R.

    1L.

    in reply to: A new baby #493764
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Nice Shots Darren 😎 Do you know what the sticker is next to the door?

    Oh dear, I was looking at the 737 and thinking, uh… The Union Flag. Too many earlies I think!

    1L.

    in reply to: A Few Scanned Pics #494119
    OneLeft
    Participant

    As they are going to and all charter outfit what are the chances of Thomson Airways reverting back to a British classic?.

    Thomson Airways is now Thomsonfly operating both charter and lo-co schedules with a very blurred crossover between the two.

    I believe the intention is that it will be re-branded again as Tuifly giving it more chance of becoming a German classic. Can anyone confirm that this is still the intention?

    1L.

    in reply to: A Few Scanned Pics #494315
    OneLeft
    Participant

    it was only ever painted in full on one aircraft (G-JOEY)

    Not sure what the registration of that aircraft was but this is the only G-JOEY I know.

    http://www.airliners.net/photo/Aurigny-Air-Services/Britten-Norman-BN-2A-Mk3/0649799/L/&tbl=photo_info&photo_nr=6&sok=keyword_%28%5C%27%2B%5C%22g-joey%5C%22%5C%27_IN_BOOLEAN_MODE%29%29_&sort=_order_by_photo_id_DESC_&prev_id=0754094&next_id=0570446

    Love the BY shots. I always think it’s so sad that such a great airline with such a long history has evolved (and coninues to do so) into what it is now.

    1L.

    in reply to: PILOT FLYING HOURS #520412
    OneLeft
    Participant

    All UK Aircrew operate to the same regulations

    Unless of course they and their company have alternative ‘industrial’ agreements, however these would always be for lesser rather than greater amounts of flying.

    1L.

    in reply to: Mind the Step #521058
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Did that bloke really try and stop it with his hands?:confused:

    If you mean the guy in the Yellow hi-vis jacket, no. I think he just happened to be reaching up to plug in his headset at the time the aircraft moved which gives that impression.

    1L.

    in reply to: Drunk cabin crew and costly delays #521064
    OneLeft
    Participant

    I think perhaps it needs to be clarified that in these instances there are standard procedures laid down in law to be followed.

    I think it very unlikely that a colleague would have called the police directly, rather advised the company via crewing that there was an issue. The company is then obliged by law to advise the police, and no airline worth its salt would risk its reputation by not complying.

    As far as the rest of the crew covering for the crewmember concerned, this is difficult as the chances are the aircraft is already carrying the minimum legally required number of crew so it is not possible to have a crewmember not operate without comprimising safety and service. The rest of the crew, including the flight crew, would also then be committing an offence.

    Regarding a replacement crewmember, ABZ is not (I believe) a base for bmi so no replacement would be available. The bmi regional crew based at ABZ would not be 320 licensed therefore unable to operate this flight. The replacement crewmember getting to ABZ from their base would be the reason for the 6 hour delay to departure.

    1L.

    in reply to: Anger as BA cancels Scottish flights and hikes fares #521254
    OneLeft
    Participant

    I’m not going to be drawn into the BA hates the regons debate that comes up on here with ever increasing regularity, however I must challenge this one.

    plan to fly an A318 from LCY to JFK for businessmen who will enjoy departing LCY to land at GLA an hour later,sit about on the plane wasting time and money while it gets refuelled!!:confused::confused: the plot truly lost.

    The current plan is a tech stop, not at Glasgow, but at Shannon where US Immigration and Customs procedures will be completed from your seat while refuelling takes place, leaving you to disembark at JFK far more easily and quickly, effectively as a domestic passenger.

    The idea for the route came about after a request from one of BA’s biggest JFK LHR corporate clients whose more senior executives wanted an easier journey to and from their UK office in Canary Wharf. It remains to be seen whether it is successful, but it doesn’t sound like a “plot truly lost” to me.

    1L.

    in reply to: New Tristar colour scheme. #521259
    OneLeft
    Participant

    That 320

    That 320 is a 319. 😉

    1L.

    in reply to: Drunk cabin crew and costly delays #521263
    OneLeft
    Participant

    It’s a shame

    Would you really be happy for this situation to be hidden by the crew operating YOUR flight?

    Bear in mind that around the drinks, meals and duty frees cabin crew may find themselves fighting fire, dealing with decompression, sorting out disruptive passengers, providing first aid, using drugs, using defibrilators, preparing aircraft for emergency landings, evacuating aircraft, dealing with hijack, etc, etc. Although unlikely, these are all possibilities, and all would be impaired to some extent when under the influence of alcohol.

    Cabin crew are very clear on the rules relating to their role and on the implications of breaking them.

    1L.

    Jus dusted off the cobwebs from my manual

    But you study them every day, don’t you?

    in reply to: New Tristar colour scheme. #522296
    OneLeft
    Participant
    in reply to: BRS …… 17TH JULY 2008 #496314
    OneLeft
    Participant

    🙂 pics.
    What are those marks around the door on EZY 737 JW

    They are the remains of the security seals that are used when an aircraft is left unattended. When removed they leave a mark that is a b***er to get off. Most aircraft will have them to some extent but that really is a build up.

    The first Ryanair 737 has a mark level with the door handle and the first Easybus has one level with the window and one about a third up the door.

    1L.

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 1,009 total)