dark light

OneLeft

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 1,009 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Passengers accuse Air France of racial profiling #549997
    OneLeft
    Participant

    A spokesman from Air France gave this response.

    1L.

    in reply to: I'd love to go to this Airport #550004
    OneLeft
    Participant

    And this is the British equivalent.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hY5TueMRq0k

    1L.

    in reply to: Passengers accuse Air France of racial profiling #550014
    OneLeft
    Participant

    With respect, that report sounds like a very one-sided account of the hysterical rants of people who aren’t getting there own way. I’m sure Air France and the immigration authorities would give a different version of events.

    I’m guessing the problem was that they needed visas to enter the country in order to go to the hotels with the other passengers, in which case the delay would have been with the Indian authorities in Paris.

    That said, given the circumstances, and under their duty of care, Air France should have kept them fed and watered.

    1L.

    in reply to: Anybody here used or at least knows Aviacsa? #550527
    OneLeft
    Participant

    the last accident they had was nineteen years ago!

    Even that was being operated for them by another airline.

    1L.

    in reply to: Has O'Leary finaly lost the plot #551034
    OneLeft
    Participant

    The whole point of hold luggage is that you can put things in there like blades, scissors etc which you can’t carry on board.

    I wouldn’t say that’s the ‘whole point’ but you do have a point.

    I have two more for MO’L to consider.

    1. Remote control aircraft with one pilot flying five aircraft at once from a control centre in whichever country lets him pay pilots the lowest wages.

    2. An onboard buffet with an honesty box for payment so that he doesn’t need any more cabin crew.

    1L.

    (I hope WW doesn’t read my second suggestion!)

    OneLeft
    Participant

    almost as expensive as a Loganair flight from Campbeltown airport

    Personally I’d rather do the Loganair flight though.

    1L.

    in reply to: Anybody here used or at least knows Aviacsa? #551042
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Hi Newflyer and welcome.

    I don’t know much about Aviacsa, but I just wanted to share a few thoughts with you.

    I worked on the 737-200 for many years and it’s a great solid, little aircraft. It is very noisy if you are sitting behind the wings and the changes in engine sounds are very noticeable. It climbs very steeply after take off and some turns can be quite sharp. After landing some parts of the engine cowling move noticeably when reverse thrust is used, pax often used to think parts were falling off, and again reverse thrust can be very noisy. Flying on a -200 isn’t as subltle as newer types, but I mention all of these so that you know they are PERFECTLY normal. For me this lack of subtlety makes it far more interesting than an Airbus.

    I see aviacsa have tried other types, such as the F100 and Bae146, but stuck with the B737. This must tell you that it is the right aircraft for their operation, and with a fleet of 23 -200’s they have to among the most experienced operators of the type today.

    I’m sure you’ll be fine. Have a good trip.

    1L.

    in reply to: bmi eyes London-Baghdad flights #552217
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Then it isn’t direct?

    By definition this is direct, it isn’t non-stop.

    1L.

    in reply to: Loganair Twotters #552230
    OneLeft
    Participant

    I’d still like to see an original Loganair livery return at some stage…

    Me too. I wondered about that as a possible for the Islanders and freight Saabs that don’t fly for BE.

    1L.

    in reply to: 1970's damaged DC-8 at MAN #468701
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Although your title says 1970’s, Orion only operated from 1980 to 1989. Going by the BAF livery I’m going to say 1982.

    I well remember standing on top of the pier taking photos of the aircraft below, I must see if I still have the photographs.

    1L.

    in reply to: Bae-146 crash today. #556547
    OneLeft
    Participant

    I know it’s Easter, but that’s no excuse for teaching your Granny to suck eggs! :diablo:

    Not even chocolate ones?

    The plot thickens while the chocolate melts…

    http://ec.europa.eu/transport/air-ban/pdf/list_en.pdf

    This is the latest list of airlines banned from the EU. Page 8 includes Garuda.

    1L.

    in reply to: Desperate times call for desperate measures #556574
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Difficult one to call really. You have to remember that this was in the US where people and law are (with respect to that side of the pond) rather more reactionary than here in Europe and elsewhere.

    The crew absolutely were 100% wrong not to move the cart for the guy. It really winds me up if I ever see colleagues keeping someone waiting behind a cart.

    Having said that, rightly or wrongly (or indeed rediculously) US law states that you may only use toilet compartments in the cabin you are travelling in, so on that basis he did attempt to break the law. There is also no excuse EVER for physically or verbally abusing someone, if indeed he did.

    Overall, IMHO it’s the law that’s at fault, rather than any of the people. Although, heaven forbid that common sense could have prevailed.

    1L.

    in reply to: LHR Concorde – Dubai bound? #557311
    OneLeft
    Participant
    in reply to: Flybe finally annouce LGW base #558269
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Of course, in it’s previous life as Jersey European, Flybe have already had a base at LGW.

    1L.

    in reply to: Concorde flies again! #560179
    OneLeft
    Participant

    from the official website of the Musée de l’Air et de l’Espace in France.

    Poisson d’Avril as the french woud say!

    1L.

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 1,009 total)