dark light

Tango Charlie

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 256 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: London Airport in the 1950s #902025
    Tango Charlie
    Participant

    I was going through some old diaries recently and came across many entries from 1958 to 1960 relating to my aircraft spotting days. This led me to this thread which I see exhausted itself last year. However I noticed that a lot of posts were made by former spotters who mainly carried out their activities from the North side of LAP so I thought it might be appropriate to mention those of us who tended to practice our hobby from the South Side particularly around Cains Lane and on the airport side of the Great West Road where we used to congregate around a sandbin and an RAC box if my memory serves me correctly.

    There are many names in my diaries which do not fully identify the individuals concerned. I sometimes referred to them by their first names, sometimes by their surnames and more often than not by their nicknames. The group was more often than not known colloquially as The South East LAP mob. It was an informal group with no administration . Just a group of people who hung around together collecting aircraft registrations. I also mentioned people who were just occasional visitors and not part of the ‘mob’. These would include such well known names as Brian Stainer the photographer and Frank Hudson , another photographer and spotter of many years standing. Many of us used to bike or bus to such wonderful places as Croydon Airport, White Waltham and Fairoaks where we had great fun in getting into the hangars through holes in fences etc.

    On occasions there was some formality and I recall in particular a coach trip to the Coventry Air Show on the 11th July 1959 when 41 members of the ‘mob’ enjoyed a great day out which ended with a sing song on the coach and the acquisition of several advertising and road signs.

    Quite a few of the group came from local schools such as Hampton (HGS) and Sunbury Grammar School (SGS)s, Longford and Southville schools in Feltham.

    One of my spotting mates , Kenny Ede, who I went to school with, has helped me to piece together a number of names and, as a result, I now know more about some of these people than when our paths crossed over half a century ago.

    Anyway I thought I would post the names from my diaries just for the sake of it. You might recognise yourself here or you might know the real name of somebody only referred to by a nickname but I would be interested to see any responses.

    These then are the people I encountered at the end of Cains Lane between 1958 and 1962 when I got my first job and started thinking more about girls than aircraft. Some were there all the time, some were there occasionally and others just for the odd visit.

    Kenny Ede (HGS) Bedfont
    Terry O’Halloran , Feltham. Ex Longford. Joined RAF
    Pete Watkins
    Frank Hudson. Ashford. Killed in motorbike accident.
    Ronnie LNU (Last Name Unknown)
    Virgo
    Bess
    Danny LNU
    Clive Rayner (Nickname ‘Tank’) Feltham
    Rodney LNU
    ‘Shrimp’
    ‘Toad’
    Vic Southern
    Ian Woodward (Nickname ‘Fluff’)
    Stan Rogers (Went to Australia)
    ‘Goblin’ (Surname may have been Godwin)
    John Goodrich
    ‘Jacko’
    Pete Whymark
    ‘Sausage’
    Ted Burly
    Vic Penny (HGS)
    Brian Dedman (HGS)
    Tony Galler (SGS)
    FNU (First name unknown) McCloud
    ‘Giant’
    Mick (LNU)
    Colin LNU (Possibly HGS)
    Doug Revell
    Ken Haywood
    FNU Nightingale
    ‘Banger’
    Willie (LNU)
    John James
    D Smiley (Possibly Dave (Smiley) Stevens)
    Roger Painter (Longford)
    Barry Hawkes (HGS)
    Paul (LNU)
    John Davison (Nickname D-Day)
    Dave Clark (Possibly nicknamed ‘Fulham’)
    John Wilby
    Gordon LNU (Rode a Lambretta)
    John Coulbeck
    Ray LNU (Policeman from Staines area)
    Ian Trott
    Les Fenn (HGS)
    Tony Newton (HGS)
    Graham Taylor – Feltham
    Gary LNU
    Pete Worrell
    Tony Carey
    George Wayne (HGS)
    Roger Davies (Known as ‘Dai’ . Worked at Gresham Transformers
    ‘Birdy’
    Fred Mundy (HGS)
    FNU Ward
    Dick Hawker
    Richard Presland Bedfont
    Barry Harmes (HGS)
    Malcolm Hunt
    Alun Jones (HGS)
    John Phillips (Staines)
    Colin Randall (Feltham)
    Maurice Davies (Feltham)
    FNU Riddlesdown
    Roger Hoodless (HGS)[ATTACH=CONFIG]237726[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]237726[/ATTACH]

    With 9 pages to trawl through not sure if this film has already been posted here. If not rather sums up what Heathrow or LAP was all about in the 1950’s. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0OzqWL8h38
    Enjoy

    in reply to: Hawker Sea Fury damaged. #903144
    Tango Charlie
    Participant

    N254SF (Seahawk) ex Iraqi 250 departed runway on landing at Denver yesterday morning. Appears to have ground looped, down on one wing damaged u/c etc. No injuries. Yet another Sea Fury out………

    The dreaded ground loop strikes again! Be interesting to read the full report, wouldn’t mind betting a reasonable crosswind didn’t help matters. All tail draggers regardless of type are susceptible hope the damage is not to extensive.
    Usual problems are stressed U/C and bent wing tip.

    in reply to: Strathallan Magister auctioned and restored #911250
    Tango Charlie
    Participant

    Ah, the Trigger’s Broom theory!

    hopefully the following will be of interest and explain some way the differences between Casein and Aerodux glues.

    Casein glue is a type of adhesive made from milk protein. The glue is known to be very strong over a long period of time and is highly resistant to water. It has a drying time that allows enough time for pieces to be positioned accurately. The process of creating this glue is nearly identical to that of making cheese and can easily be performed at home. Although most adhesives are based on synthetic chemicals, casein glue still enjoys use as a natural binder.

    There have been many uses for casein glue throughout history. There are records that show it was created and used by the ancient Egyptians. It was employed in the Middle Ages to bind together thin panels into thicker plates on which artists could paint. It also is believed to be used by makers of famous musical instruments that have lasted for a century or more. It was used extensively in woodworking, furniture making and to assemble wooden aircraft as late as the 1940’s

    While casein glue can be purchased commercially, it also can be made at home with similar results. The process involves heating milk and then adding an acid such as vinegar to separate the curds from the whey. The curds are taken out of the excreted liquid and mixed with baking soda to neutralize the acid. The remaining liquid from the curds is removed by pressing them under a heavy weight. The final result is a white paste-like substance that will become a powerful adhesive when dry.

    If one is making casein glue at home, it should be noted that the fat content of the milk plays a part in the strength of the glue. Milk that has a high fat content, such as whole milk, will produce weaker glue than non-fat and low-fat milks. This is because the fat in the milk prevents the casein from polymerizing.

    In addition to being very strong and having a long lifespan, casein glue is also very water resistant. Unlike some adhesives, water will not weaken or dissolve casein. In some cases, however, water that comes into contact with the adhesive can pass on microorganisms that will eat the glue and eventually destroy it, but this is not a function of the water itself. Here is the problem with wooden aircraft from D H, Miles and Percival that have sat outside allowing water ingress into their structures. Glue failures were widespread in the late 1950’s early 1960’s causing many countries aviation authorities to ground the types affected. I know of a Miles Gemini that has never spent a night outside in its life and is still perfectly bonded with the original casein glue.

    The drying time of casein glue can be a benefit in many situations. It takes a long time for the glue to properly cure and harden. This can allow the assembly of multiple complex parts that might need to be moved during assembly before securing them to allow the glue to set. This also might be a disadvantage for projects that require something that sets more immediately.

    Aerodux of Phenole Rescorscine type, the Aerodux is a glue that certainly has come of age. It belongs to one of the oldest glue (and plastic, in fact) families around. Like all glue of aero quality it should arrive with a data sheet.
    The glue is two component, the glue itself a reddish brown liquid that often comes in 1 litre cans. As filler is cheaper than glue it sometimes contains filler in the form of ground nut shell.

    Hardener is a whitish powder packed in tin cans or plastic bags.

    Phenols are poison to fish, that means if you pour your surplus Aerodux into a pond the fish might die. It contains very little solvents, and in the hardened state is chemically neutral. Apart from the mentioned effect on fish I know of no health hazhard connected to this glue. But I certainly would not drink it.

    I used to mix my glue in a paper cup, and use a letter weight to assure mixing ratio. The ratio is 100 to 20 (100g of glue and 20g of hardener). The ratio is not critical. The glue also can be mixed by the volume, ratio here is 100 to 55.

    After weighing the glue should be stirred properly to dissolve all hardener. Stirring should be continued till no lumps remain. The mix then should rest for about 10 minutes before being used.

    The following times are relevant to Aerodux 185:

    Shelf life: Here the literature seems to give different information. Some batches I have used made by Dyno Chemicals, UK, state a shelf life of 1 year. Others say only 1/2 year. This is true for the glue component, shelf life for the hardener is indefinite. It should be noted that once the can is opened, the glue starts deteriorating. It becomes darker in colour and later lumps appear. So when a can is opened the shelf life is reduced. Close the lid as quickly as possible! It is up to your judgement when to throw it away, but as a rule the glue should be liquid. No lumps are allowed. Aerodux should be stored in temperatures between +5C and +20C.

    Pot life: The time from mixing till application is done. Varies with temperature of course, but a normal value is 2,5h at 20C. Temperature should not be lower than +15C (by the way this goes for the materials to be glued as well) and higher temperatures than +25C are inconvenient (I understand you aussies). High temperatures make application a real rat race – more on this later. Pot life does not increase very much on lowering temperature.

    Open time: Now here is the usual criticism against this stuff coming up. Open time is the time from when spreading the glue is commenced till the two surfaces are put together. The rule here is that on putting together the first glue spread should still be clearly liquid. Open time varies, shortening with increased temperature and increasing slightly wit increased air humidity. A slightly cool (+15C) and moist atmosphere is favorable. Still the open time rarely exceeds 15min, so application of the glue should be swift – certainly an unexpected problem for the epoxy freaks. On suspicion that the open time has been exceeded the parts should be scraped clean and possibly sanded before a new (and swifter) application is done. Friends with brushes is a big asset when big areas are to be glued! To add to the problem it seems that open time is reduced gradually with time after mixing.

    Closed time: The time between closing of a joint till glue pressure is applied. Now here things can move more leisurely. Again varying with temperature, we can have more than 1/2h here. But check that no part of the joint remains open in this phase – it can ruin your whole day.

    Glue pressure time or clamped time: A normal value is min. 8 hours at +20C. The glue demands medium high glue pressure to produce a sound joint, to attain this often can be difficult. I use to leave the glued parts for about 24H with clamps attached. Aerodux can be express hardened in high temperatures without any side effects. The joint has full strength after about a week.

    Brushes, paper cups and other equipment can be rinsed in cold water as long as the glue is not hardened. After hardening a hammer is a possible cleaning tool. Once hardened the glue is not soluble by any solvent, but have some thermoplastic properties. In fact, the ply we use is also Phenole Rescorcine glued. Here glue comes in foil that is put between the thin wood layers, and fused by high temperature and high pressure in big presses.

    Using Aerodux takes a little while to get used to, especially the old epoxy users will find the short open time and need for relatively high glue pressure inconvenient. Personally I find that reduced (if any) health risk and unsurpassed aging qualities more than outweigh the disadvantages. In the end the choice will be that of your controller’s as well as your own. You have to comply to his demands.

    Likewise I haste to add that in case of conflict between information found in my writing and the data sheet, the last mentioned is always correct!

    The airplane business surprisingly (to some) is quite conservative. While this may be frustrating I find comfort in using tested and tried materials and solutions. New materials and methods certainly can be exiting, convenient and have other qualities. But for me there is a big difference between believing and knowing. So I guess I belong to a somewhat conservative fraternity. At least glue-vide. The oldest Aerodux glued aircraft still flying is now over 61 years old. On its last annual the glued structure was found to be perfectly solid with no sign whatsoever of glue failure anywhere. This and other Aerodux glued aircraft will fly on for decades to come.

    in reply to: Strathallan Magister auctioned and restored #911764
    Tango Charlie
    Participant

    Is this really the case? is there any hard data to back this? there are very valuable musical instruments and antique furniture several hundreds of years old held together with casein cement. The stresses and strains found in parts of these instruments and furniture would be approaching that found in the spars of some of these early light aircraft. There was a problem with the early synthetic glues (urea formaldehyde) which was used in many post war light aircraft such as the miles messenger and percival proctor. i have a keen interest in this topic! truth is there a few engineers around with much knowledge of this stuff nowadays…

    Maybe no hard and fast data to prove the above. However look at Jodels as an example. For instance the oldest flying is now over 60 years in age, screwed and glued with Aerodux. We have one at Great Oakley, a 1961 model in superb original order, never re glued or rebuilt, shes now 54. Annual inspections show the glued joints to be perfect and I know the former BA captain that owns her is a stickler for safety. Any hint of delamination and he would not consider flying it. The difference as stated is that with casein your life depends on it retaining its bonding qualities whilst aloft, if the shaft of your casein violin snaps whist playing you live on!!

    in reply to: Strathallan Magister auctioned and restored #912689
    Tango Charlie
    Participant

    In that case I have no idea how you check the structure

    Moggy

    Its highly likely the aircraft when she was rebuilt used Aerodux glue throughout. If so and stored as she was in a well aired garage the structure should be fine. Obviously a very thorough check was required and all inspection hatches will have been removed and possibly small areas of fabric to inspect the timbers below. Casein glue from the 30’s whilst fine at the time suffers from the ravages of time, hats why wooden aircraft in the early 60’s Miles, Percival etc were grounded in large numbers. The cost of opening up the spars and a major airframe check or full rebuild was well in excess of the aircraft’s value, the flood of new metal types from the US meant most were broken up or burnt.

    Had Aerodux been available in the 30’s there would likely be dozens more Miles and Percival types around today rather then the mere handful left.

    in reply to: A Sleeping Beauty Awakens from Her 61 Year Slumber #916084
    Tango Charlie
    Participant

    Would love to see the Proctor in the civil scheme. But either way would just love to see it out and about, too many vintage aircraft are never seen at events like Popham, Sywell, North Weald etc

    Thanks for all responses, civil scheme is certainly what I wish, but convincing the other group members is the hard part. Rest assured this Proctor will be seen (weather allowing) at many vintage events. Furthermore its a 3/4 seater and apart from early days whilst I get to grips with her and her flying characteristics at least two other seats need to be occupied!! Those who have helped us in our quest to return this lovely old aeroplane to the skies will all be flown, thereafter we will do our best to accommodate other requests.

    Its by sharing the flying experience of a classic design that I believe will bring more young blood into the vintage aircraft fold and hopefully instill interest in similar rebuilds in the future.

    in reply to: Joy Lofthouse (92) Spitfire Flying Again #916862
    Tango Charlie
    Participant

    I was just going to post this too: what an amazing woman!

    Joy has over 7 hours logged in our Proctor (on rebuild). Really hoping we can also get her airborne in it 71 years since she last flew it.

    in reply to: Aeroplane Monthly – Cracking Gladiator article #924464
    Tango Charlie
    Participant

    The Gladiator has always been my favourite biplane. If I had to choose just one warbird to fly it would be my first choice by a long way, so ten pages of Gloster-porn in this month’s magazine was impossible to resist.

    Two things stood out for me. One was the glimpse of Stephen Grey’s early life and his progress to the head of TFC – Funny, it seems he’s always been there, but to read in his own words the path that brought him there was fascinating.

    The other was the behind-the-scenes insight into the acquisition of N5903. I was left wondering who “Mr Stratospheric” was (And why his offer wasn’t grabbed with both hands).

    Topped off with the fantabulous John Dibbs double page image too. Pure Gladiator magic!

    Moggy

    PS: If you are thinking this is a thinly disguised Key Publishing promo, think again. I bought my copy with my own hard-earned. :apologetic:

    Read my copy flying back yesterday Lanzarote to Thruxton. Got to agree, a great read, photos of exceptional quality, beautiful aeroplane shame so few survive

    in reply to: Gypsy Moth G-ABYA #847889
    Tango Charlie
    Participant

    Watched a very interesting TV program about the restoration of Gypsy Moth G-ABYA.
    A quick Google seems to suggest information about the aircraft ends in 2003.
    Does anyone have any further information on the condition and where-a bouts of the aircraft,
    and where was the TV prog set?

    Restored by Cobair and largely filmed at Biggin Hill. As for A/C’s current where about’s who knows

    in reply to: Doug Gregory DFC 1923-2015 #853173
    Tango Charlie
    Participant

    Very very sad news, he and his family deserved better than this. Sincere sympathy to his family and friends.

    For a second you were flying
    Like you always wanted to
    Now you’ll fly forever
    In skies of azure blue

    Indeed a sad day. I met Doug briefly at Project Propellor and two of my veterans I flew there last year, both in their early 90’s have also left the circuit.

    Blue skies gents, the brief time I spent with you will always be cherished.

    in reply to: Buried Hurricane, Thurrock, photo evidence, #854116
    Tango Charlie
    Participant

    Anyone digging in their back gardens in Chafford, you may find this !

    http://www.thurrockgazette.co.uk/columnists/down_memory_lane/8937243.Road_originated_from_chalk_pit/

    A memorial does exist on site to the pilot. My business address is less then 150 yards from it, I went to look at it last year. One of my neighbours (Roy) on the estate aged 74 remembers his parents showing him where the Hurricane impacted, this was some time in the early 50’s when the site was still a chalk quarry and not built on. Roy has worked all his life on the estate and knows its history inside out. I intend to lay a wreath on the memorial in October on the 75th anniversary of the crash.

    in reply to: Chariots of Fire FW190 landing incident #860972
    Tango Charlie
    Participant

    Let’s be clear, by the way, that this is not a “Focke-Wulf FW-190” but a replica. I’m sorry he hurt his airplane, but I’m sorrier that the line between real and imaginary is increasingly being blurred in this age of data-plate specials, homebuilt replicas and other make-believe wannabes. There are Ferraris and ferraris, and there are Focke-Wulfs and focke-wulfs.

    To add my tuppence worth its as close we are likely to see an FW 190 fly and I for one think they look and sound great. The late Tommy Sopwith I believe when viewing the northern aeroplane workshops Sopwith Triplane creation built to original plans and materials signed it off as a late production Triplane. Who gives a fig if its a rebuild, replica, tribute, re creation, call it what you want, it flies, looks just like the originals and should be appreciated not derided.

    in reply to: AB910 in invasion markings. #905268
    Tango Charlie
    Participant

    64 Squadron for sure.

    Mark

    Interesting. Am I right in thinking that towards wars end especially after the invasion that confidence was sufficient enough within the top brass to allow what would be possibly considered obsolete Spitfire marks to fly again at the front line?
    Was it a case of needing to use them in anticipation of numbers required for the allied side, or expected numbers of axis defenders that necessitated every machine and pilot to be available and take part?

    As already stated a 109G was bought down by a Mk V, performance of successive Spitfire Marks improved (I think) throughout the war. Given the advantage of height and a diving attack most early war fighters from either side presumably were still quite capable of inflicting death and destruction on their enemy, even those with just 303’s and not cannon equipped.

    in reply to: The Percival web site? #912705
    Tango Charlie
    Participant

    Here is a current list of Proctor survivors. There are of course all the surviving Gull variants and metal Percival types that could be added.

    Production consisted of 247 Mk.I, 175 Mk.2, 437 Mk.3, 258 MK.4, and 150 Mk.5. A single Proctor 6 floatplane was produced in 1946 for the Hudson Bay Company. The 42 survivors known, listed as follows.

    TF-HGS Ae.57 (G-AHGS) Proctor 5 R Iceland (substantial remains)
    TF-VIB K.242 Proctor 1 (G-AHVH) R Reykjavik, Iceland (Part fuselage, centre section and one wing)
    VH-UXS ) K.246 Proctor 1(G-AHFU R Cheltenham, Victoria, Australia, for sale at 02-05-10 (under restoration to flying condition)
    VH-AUC K.253 Proctor 1 (G-AHDI) P Moorabbin, Australia
    VH-AVG H.224 Proctor 2 (G-AHVG) R Alice Springs, Australia
    VH-FEP K.279 Proctor 1 (G-AHTN) P Canberra, Australia
    VH-BCX K.305 Proctor 1 R Mandeville, New Zealand Guy Clapshaw (possible restoration to flying condition)
    VH-AHR H.466 Proctor 3 R Brisbane, Australia
    VH-AHY H.9 Proctor 1(G-AIEB) R Brisbane. (under restoration to flying condition)
    VH-BCM (G-AGTB) Ae.8 Proctor 5 P Narellan, Australia
    VH-BQR K.392 Proctor 2 (G-ALIS) P Bullcreek, Australia
    VH-SCC H.44 Proctor 2 R Brisbane, Australia
    G-AHMP H.170 Proctor 2 S Little Staughton, Bedfordshire (Part fuselage and centre section)
    G-AHTE Ae.58 Proctor 5 Under restoration Great Oakley, Essex, (under restoration to flying condition)
    G-AHWO Ae.72 Proctor 5 R Celbridge. (substantially complete but very poor condition)
    G-AKEX Proctor 3 Great Oakley, Essex, (under restoration to flying condition)
    G-AKIU Ae.129 Proctor 5 Air Atlantique, Coventry, England. (Airworthy)
    G-AKZN K.386 Proctor 2 R Stafford RAF museum reserve collection
    G-ALCK H.536 Proctor 3 Imperial War Museum Duxford
    G-ALJF K.427 Proctor 2 A Biggin Hill Crashed on landing Kent 2011, AAIB report state DBR though possibly to be re built)
    G-AMAL H.47 Proctor 3 D Hundleshope Heights, (complete accident damaged airframe stored since 1968)
    G-ANPP Proctor 3, last seen leaving Stanstead airport on a low loader circa 1979, registered to P Jeffreys, Saffron Walden Essex. Acquired by the Great Oakley Percival restoration team 2011
    in store for possible re build to airworthy status.
    G-ANVY (SE-CEA)(RM169) H.772 Proctor 4, Eslovs, Sweden (to Great Oakley May 2010) (possible restoration to flying condition)
    G-ANXR (RM221) H.803 Proctor 4 Biggin Hill, (Airworthy)
    G-AOAR H.588 Proctor 4 S Biggin Hill (Cobby Moore Stored)
    G-AOBI Proctor 4 (remains stored in the north)
    G-AOGE H.210 Proctor 2 R Biggin Hill (under long term restoration to flying condition)
    OO-ARM (G-AHZY) Ae.84 Proctor 5 S Brussels,Museum (static)
    OY-ACP H.274 Proctor 3 P 20 miles from Helsingore, Denmark.
    P-4 H.578 (NP171) Proctor 4 P Brussels Museum (static)
    NP294 H.678 Proctor 4 R E.Kirby, original military specification never civilianised
    EI-ACV K.426? Proctor 2 S Celbridge (a few remaining parts)
    EC-AHB Proctor 3 Madrid, Spain. (Airframe complete and stored).
    ZK-AQK (c/n Ae79) Originally registered Dec 11 1947 this aircraft had various owners including Southern Scenic. It was withdrawn from use at Roxburgh in 1965. It returned to the register on Nov 10, 1977. The aircraft was restored (including the engine) but is not airworthy. The registration was again cancelled on January 24, 1991. Has been displayed at the Ashburton Aviation Museum, but is now with the owner at at Dunsandel.
    ZK-AQJ (c/n Ae50) Last flown in 1972, the registration was cancelled on April 1, 1992. Currently in storage at Auckland.
    ZK-AQZ (c/n Ae143) ex G-AHGN was built at Luton and first flew on October 27, 1948. The aircraft was imported by Ernie Clark, the New Zealand Percival agent, and used as a demonstrator. He retained the aircraft until his death in December 1964. The aircraft then passed through various owners including Airwork (NZ) Ltd, B.R.Cragg, A.J.Robinson, Scotts Engineering Ltd, and P.Dyer. In 1972 the aircraft went to the Golden Age Flying Society (GAFS) at Omaka, near Blenheim. When this ceased its activities in the late 1970’s, its assets passed to the Sport and Vintage Aviation Society (SVAS) at Masterton. The aircraft was only displayed in a static condition for some years. However, in 1990 restoration work began supported largely by Lottery Board funding. Many hours and approximately NZ$60,000 later, AQZ made its first official post restoration flight on October 10, 1993 in the hands of John Lanham. Today the aircraft remains (airworthy) at Masterton with the SVAS. Advertised for sale 2012 for circa £65,000 sterling.
    ZK-APH (c/n Ae126) Formerly operated by the Waikato Aero Club as ‘Spirit of Waikato’. The aircraft was withdrawn from use at Ardmore in 1967. The registration was cancelled on January 24, 1991. Last reported in storage in Chistchurch. Status unknown.
    ZK-ARP (c/n Ae97) ex G-AIEO was manufactured in October 1946. The aircraft was shipped to New Zealand in June 1948 for the Wairarapa and Ruahine Aero Club having flown a total of 50 minutes. The aircraft went into service in September 1948. In December 1950 the aircraft went to the Wellington Aero Club, where it stayed until April 1957. The aircraft was then stored in Nelson for two years. The aircraft was purchased by Frank Brittain and taken to Palmerston North, where it was rebuilt over a five year period. The aircraft was occassionaly flown by the owner for a number of years. Stored after his death, the aircraft has been restored by Stan and Gilly Smith at North Shore and is now (airworthy) and operated by a syndicate.
    ZK-AVW (c/n Ae78) ex G-AGWW Named ‘Kiwi Wanderer’, this aeroplane was flown to New Zealand by Arthur Bradshaw. The aircraft was last flown at Wanganui in October 1972. The registration was cancelled on January 25, 1991. Currently in storage at Auckland.
    ZK-DPP Proctor 1 (G-AHTV) (modified to represent Vega Gull) (airworthy) New Zealand.
    Unknown Proctor 5? D India.
    ZS-DCO (c/n) Ae 105 SAAF Museum South Africa, ex G-AIEU
    LR 101 C/n AE118 Proctor V. First flown 25-11-46 then stored. Issued with C of A 10469 issued 05-04-49 to Lebanese Government and to Lebanese airforce as LR 101. Flown Luton to Beirut by Wing commander EPP Gibbs 07-04-49 (with Proctor V LR102). Still extant in technical college outside Beirut.

    CF-EHF Ae.140 Proctor 6, Hamilton, Ontario (remains of the Mk 6 built with floats for the Hudson Bay Company)

    in reply to: Blackbushe Thread Farnborough Aviation Group #922888
    Tango Charlie
    Participant

    This Farnborough Forum has just been closed with immediate effect…..did anybody archive the 114 Blackbushe pages?

    I was not aware of any issues and thoroughly enjoyed the pictures and reading the posts on the Blackbushe pictures of the past forum.
    Surely a forum should allow members to add comment good or bad?

    I hope the host reconsiders and re instates the forum or at least make public his grievances.

    His action just closing it as he has strikes me as somewhat petulant, even childish. If you set a forum up you have to take the good with the bad a fact of internet life.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 256 total)