dark light

Stonewall

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 437 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Navy News from Around the World II #2068009
    Stonewall
    Participant

    number of French FREMM reduced, the land-attack version abandoned, reduced from 17 to 9 units
    (sry in French only)

    Frégates : La Marine nationale abandonne les FREMM AVT

    Vue d’une FREMM
    crédits : DCN

    01/10/2008

    La flotte française ne disposera finalement pas de la version Action Vers la Terre (AVT) de la frégate multi-missions, a-t-on appris de source militaire. Initialement, 9 bâtiments de ce type devaient être construits, en parallèle de 8 navires à vocation anti-sous-marine. Alors que les FREMM ASM devaient remplacer les 9 frégates du type Georges Leygues et Tourville, les FREMM AVT avaient pour but de succéder aux avisos du type A69. Dans cette configuration, le sonar remorqué et sa machinerie, présents sur les frégates ASM, auraient été remplacés par un petit radier accueillant une embarcation commando (mise à l’eau rapide par l’arrière), ainsi que des espaces pour loger le matériel des forces spéciales (*). Après la parution du Livre Blanc sur la Défense et la décision de réduire la série des 17 FREMM à seulement 9 unités, il fut décidé d’abandonner la variante AVT pour concentrer le programme sur le renouvellement des frégates anti-sous-marines, élément indispensable de la protection des approches maritimes, de la force océanique stratégique ou encore du groupe aéronaval.
    En parallèle, une variante antiaérienne de la FREMM a été étudiée, afin d’assurer le renouvellement des Cassard et Jean Bart, frégates au système d’armes vieillissant, mises en service en 1988 et 1991. Baptisés FRégates de Défense Aérienne (FREDA), ces navires devraient être commandé l’an prochain, à deux exemplaires, en même temps que la neuvième et dernière FREMM ASM (Les 8 premières ont été notifiées fin 2005).
    Longue de 142 mètres pour un déplacement de 6000 tonnes en charge, la FREMM disposera de 8 missiles antinavire Exocet MM40, 16 missiles antiaériens Aster 15, 16 missiles de croisière Scalp Naval, un canon de 76 mm, 4 mitrailleuses de 12.7 mm, 19 torpilles MU90 et un hélicoptère NH90.
    Les FREDA devraient, quant à elle, embarquer des missiles Aster 30, d’une portée de 70 kilomètres.

    http://www.meretmarine.com/article.cfm?id=108427

    in reply to: Navy News from Around the World II #2068455
    Stonewall
    Participant

    future Portuguese Frigate “Bartolomeu Dias” on Sea Accepance Trials

    http://i43.servimg.com/u/f43/12/53/24/68/vnes-d10.jpg

    pics cortesy RNLN photography service

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2069089
    Stonewall
    Participant

    Any updates on the YUROSLAV MUDRY Status??????

    sorry for asking again but nobody replied:(

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2069358
    Stonewall
    Participant

    ‘Faina’: Ukrainian ship with 30 Russian T-72 tanks seized by Somali pirates off Kenya coast

    Submitted by Guest on Fri, 09/26/2008 – 21:37. Pirates hijack ship off Kenya coast
    By GITONGA MARETE and AGENCIES
    The Nation (East Africa)
    Posted Friday, September 26 2008 at 13:55
    http://www.nation.co.ke/News/-/1056/474856/-/tkva48/-/
    Somali pirates on Thursday afternoon seized a ship carrying more than 30 military tanks in a dramatic hijacking that sent ripples in the maritime industry.
    The Ukrainian vessel flying the flag of Belize was expected to dock in Mombasa Friday morning with its cargo that was believed destined to Southern Sudan according to maritime sources.
    The ship was on its last two of a 10-day voyage and was hijacked between Kismayu and Mombasa, Seafarers Assistance Programme Coordinator Mr Andrew Mwangura said.
    “The ship, whose design is that of a vehicle carrier, had 17 crew members and 38 military tanks on board,” he said on the phone adding: “This was to be the third ship to dock in Mombasa with military equipment from Ukraine.”
    Mr Mwangura said that although the destination of the tanks was not immediately known, they were likely destined to Southern Sudan where the previous ones had been delivered.
    Somali waters are considered the most dangerous in the world, with each militia group controlling their own sections of the ocean.
    Ships carrying food aid to the war ravaged country have to be escorted by navy war ships, with the most recent being Canadian Navy which ends its escort mission on September 27.
    News agency reports quoting Ukraine’s foreign ministry, had earlier reported that the ship was carrying T-72 tanks and had a crew of 21 on board. The captain contacted the ship’s owner by telephone and reported that armed men were boarding, shortly before losing communications.
    The country has not had an effective national government for 17 years, leading to a collapse of law and order both on land and at sea.
    Reports: Somali pirates seize ship carrying 30 tanks
    http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline…ts-somali.html
    Somali pirates seized a ship yesterday that may have been carrying about 30 T-72 tanks off the coast of western Africa, a Ukrainian news agency reports, citing an anonymous source.
    Interfax says hijackers seized control of the Faina, which was carrying 21 people, while it was en route to Kenya with the military hardware. Reuters says the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry confirmed the hijacking, but didn’t disclose the ship’s cargo.
    “Andrew Mwangura, who runs the Kenya chapter of the Seafarers Assistance Program, confirmed to the BBC that the ship was carrying a cargo of tanks,” the British broadcaster reports. “The tanks were due to be transported by road from Kenya to South Sudan.”

    http://www.ufs.ph/new/node/1532

    ……………….

    Frigate Neustrashimy on the route to Somalia

    MOSCOW (AP) — A Russian warship on Friday rushed to intercept a Ukrainian vessel carrying 33 battle tanks and a hoard of ammunition that was seized by pirates off the Horn of Africa — a bold hijacking that again heightened fears about surging piracy and high-seas terrorism.
    A U.S. warship is tracking the vessel but there has been no decision about intercepting it, U.S. Defense Department officials said.
    “I think we’re looking at the full range of options here,” Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said.
    It was unclear whether the pirates who seized the 530-foot-long cargo ship Faina on Thursday knew what it carried. Still, analysts said it would be extremely difficult to sell such high-profile weaponry like Russian tanks.
    The hijacking, with worldwide pirate attacks surging this year, could help rally stronger international support behind France, which has pushed aggressively for decisive action against Somali pirates.
    Russian navy spokesman Capt. Igor Dygalo told The Associated Press that the missile frigate Neustrashimy left the Baltic Sea port of Baltiisk a day before the hijacking to cooperate with other unspecified countries in anti-piracy efforts.
    But he said the ship was then ordered directly to the Somalia coast after Thursday’s attack.
    According to the British-based Jane’s Information Group, the Neustrashimy is armed with surface-to-air missiles, 100 mm guns and anti-submarine torpedoes.
    Ukrainian Defense Minister Yury Yekhanurov, meanwhile, said the hijacked vessel Faina was carrying 33 Russian-built T-72 tanks and a substantial quantity of ammunition and spare parts. He said the tanks were sold to Kenya in accordance with international law.
    Ukrainian officials and an anti-piracy watchdog said 21 crew members were aboard the seized ship, including three Russians. Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko ordered unspecified measures to free the crew, but it was unclear whether any of the former Soviet republic’s naval vessels had been dispatched.
    A Kenyan government spokesman, Alfred Mutua, confirmed the East African nation’s military had ordered the tanks and spare parts. The tanks are part of a two-year rearmament program.
    “The government is in contact with international maritime agencies and other security partners in an endeavor to secure the ship and cargo,” Mutua said in a statement. “The government is actively monitoring the situation.”
    A person who answered the telephone at Ukrainian state-controlled arms dealer Ukrspetsexport, which brokered the sale, refused to comment, and said all requests for information must be submitted in writing.
    It was unclear where the shipment originated, though Ukrainian news agencies identified the ship operator as a company called Tomex Team based in the Black Sea port of Odessa. Calls to Tomex offices went unanswered Friday.
    At the Pentagon, two defense officials said the warship was tracking the Ukrainian ship but there has been no decision about taking any other action such as intercepting it. The officials said that besides the T-72 tanks, it was carrying guns and rocket launchers. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.
    “Obviously, we are deeply concerned,” said Lt. Nate Christensen, a spokesman for the Bahrain-based U.S. 5th Fleet, declining to provide details.
    Whitman, the Pentagon spokesman, said the United States was worried about the cargo.
    “A ship carrying cargo of that nature being hijacked off the coast of Somalia is something that should concern us, and it does concern us,” he said.
    The Navy says the 5th Fleet includes the USS Ronald Reagan aircraft carrier and several support ships, which “deter destabilizing activities and ensure a lawful maritime order in the Arabian (Persian) Gulf, Arabian Sea, Gulf of Oman and Gulf of Aden.”
    Paul Cornish, head of the international security program at the London-based think-tank Chatham House said the tanks would be difficult to sell on to a third party — private buyers or warlords, for example — because of the logistics involved with keeping them operational.
    “It’s not like (stealing) a container full of machine guns, where all you need is a tin of bicycle oil,” he said.
    Roger Middleton, another Chatham House researcher, said it was unlikely the pirates knew there were tanks aboard the Faina, and also said unloading the cargo would be difficult.
    “Most of their attacks are based on opportunity. So if they see something that looks attackable and looks captureable, they’ll attack it,” he said.
    Middleton said it was unclear how the pirates might react if confronted by military action, noting that they have fled from authorities in the past. On the other hand, he said, they are usually well-armed and organized and are based in an unstable country — Somalia.
    “It could potentially get pretty messy,” he said.
    Long a hazard for maritime shippers — particularly in the Indian Ocean and its peripheries — high-seas piracy has triggered greater alarm since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the United States because of its potential as a funding and supply source for global terrorism.
    Pirate attacks worldwide have surged this year and Africa remains the world’s top piracy hotspot, with 24 reported attacks in Somalia and 18 in Nigeria this year, according to the International Maritime Bureau’s piracy reporting center.
    The issue burst into international view Sept. 15 when Somali pirates took two French citizens captive aboard a luxury yacht and helicopter-borne French commandos then swooped in to rescue them.
    French President Nicolas Sarkozy this month called on other nations to move boldly against pirates, calling the phenomenon “a genuine industry of crime.”
    In June, the U.N. Security Council — pushed by France and the United States — unanimously adopted a resolution allowing ships of foreign nations that cooperate with the Somali government to enter their territorial waters “for the purpose of repressing acts of piracy and armed robbery at sea.

    http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5ifpBJseu0GVLta5D6t_1zOpaKSiwD93ENISO0

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2069524
    Stonewall
    Participant

    Any updates on the YUROSLAV MUDRY Status??????

    in reply to: Flankers beats F-35 in highly classified simulated dogfight ? #2469632
    Stonewall
    Participant

    Australian Air Force jet purchase slammed

    Updated September 24, 2008 11:15:52

    A United States think tank has declared the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft that Australia is set to buy is inferior to the Russian-made Flanker jets used by China and Indonesia.

    The RAND Corporation’s experts compared jets in a war game and the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Radio Australia’s parent company, has obtained the results.

    In bad news for the Australian Air Force, the report says the F-35 has inferior acceleration, climb, turn capacity and a lower top speed than Russian and Chinese fighters.

    In short, it says the Joint Strike Fighter cannot climb and cannot run.

    It says the US fighter which could outdo the Russian-made Flankers is the F-22 Raptor.

    But the United States bans these from foreign sales.

    The fighters’ defenders argue it is not designed for close combat.

    The RAND Corporation says a ‘Plan B’ is necessary and points out that if the F-35 is seen or has to engage an enemy at close range, then it will be no match for the Flankers.

    Earlier this week federal Opposition MP Dennis Jensen called on the Australian Government to scrap plans to buy the F-35, saying they could leave the country vulnerable.

    “The problem is, if the perceived level of our capability is not very high some nation might think that it’s worth the risk to take us on for some reason or another given the perceived benefit,” he said.

    A spokesman for Defence Minister Joel Fitzgibbon says he is convinced the Joint Strike Fighter is the best aircraft available, but the minister has not released the air combat capability review which studied the options.

    http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/news/stories/200809/s2372834.htm?tab=latest

    in reply to: "Russian Drone Shot Down By Georgia" #2469757
    Stonewall
    Participant

    Saakashvili made it crash with his bad breath :dev2:

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2069611
    Stonewall
    Participant

    The group is going to visit 25 countries during a 2 month trip (latest update).

    can you specify which countries???

    Any chance of a scale in Portugal (Lisbon?)

    Anyway the Velikiy is nuclear-powered so she would not be allowed to moore…. 🙁 🙁

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2069673
    Stonewall
    Participant

    Ochakov isen’t Kresta clas (pr. 1134/A, but Kara class (1134B)

    sorry , my mistake
    🙁

    anyway it seems she is going to be scrapped, after all

    Fair well, Ochakov.

    Thus, on the 21st of September, the hull of the BPK Ochakov was towed to the dock for preparations for towing to the breakers. And so ends the epoch of a great raid on the treasury for the Black Sea Fleet, started by Admiral Kasatonov. Using his position, this bad man (and on this I insist that Kasatonov is a bad man) sent the BPK Azov to the breakers in the 90s, which was in much better condition and, most importantly, functioned!!, which was very uncharacteristic for the 90s. The decommissioning of the Azov allowed Kasatonov to allocate money for the repair of the Ochakov which should have become a “miracle-ship” with all new armament. She didn’t and all the money was looted. And the Azov, the only BPK with a modern long range naval SAM, was cut into razor blades…And now Ochakov has been launched down the same path…wicked isn’t too strong a term…

    http://lenivship.livejournal.com/115090.html

    in reply to: Navy News from Around the World II #2069696
    Stonewall
    Participant

    In the picture NPS Bartolomeu Dias (M 333), making evidence of Mar in September 17 last off the coast of Holland. The ship is forecast to enter service in Portugal on November 1, 2008.

    sorry colleague just some corrections, it’s F 333
    and hand-over date is scheduled for November 21st

    🙂 cheers

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2069700
    Stonewall
    Participant

    The cruiser Ochakov being modernized and refitted(Black Sea). Photo taken today 22 September 2008.

    Snake, do you have any info on what it will receive?

    http://img355.imageshack.us/img355/5828/shipphotoochakoveu3.jpg

    there are some more photos of her moving to drydock in http://www.shipspotting.com

    Anyone with more details? A question that was raised in another forum that I find interesting : Why scrap Udaloys (for example) and keep a Kresta, of much more older design? Can someone clarify????? thx 🙂

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2069711
    Stonewall
    Participant

    Right you are, Shaposhnikov, not Malinovsky.
    Peter the Great and Adm. Chabanenko have already sailed today for Venezuela, accompanied by couple of auxilaries.

    video in English
    http://www.russiatoday.com/news/news/30801/video

    in reply to: Navy News from Around the World II #2070161
    Stonewall
    Participant

    Astute Delays

    (Source: UK Ministry of Defence; issued Sept. 15, 2008)

    The Sunday Telegraph business section has reported that the Astute nuclear submarine programme could be further delayed.

    Constructing nuclear submarines is one of the most complex and sophisticated projects the maritime industry undertakes. The skills required to build each are particularly specialised. Technical issues with first of class vessels are not uncommon.

    We are working closely with BAE Systems to minimise impact to the overall programme, and in addressing such matters, the safety of the boat and its crew – which will operate in the most demanding conditions – are paramount at all times.

    The Astute submarines will represent an exciting increase in capability that will keep the Royal Navy, alongside the US Navy, at the top of the submarine nations’ leader board.

    -ends-

    http://www.defense-aerospace.com

    in reply to: Navy News from Around the World II #2071919
    Stonewall
    Participant

    [QUOTE=Rav3n;1289771]

    Big Russian flotilla heads for Syrian port

    DEBKAfile’s military sources disclose that a powerful Russian naval contingent, led by the aircraft carrier Admiral
    Kuznetsov
    , left Murmansk on the Barents Sea Aug. 18 destined to dock at the Syrian Mediterranean port of Tartus
    Saturday, Aug. 23. It includes the Russian Navy’s biggest missile cruiser Moskva and at least four nuclear missile
    submarines

    DEBKA is full of bull****. Try doing a deployment from the Brents Sea to Syria in 5 days..

    If i’m not mistaken this deployment has been confirmed by some other sources already

    try http://www.militaryphotos.net for details

    cheers

    in reply to: Navy News from Around the World II #2072149
    Stonewall
    Participant

    Big Russian flotilla heads for Syrian port

    DEBKAfile’s military sources disclose that a powerful Russian naval contingent, led by the aircraft carrier Admiral
    Kuznetsov
    , left Murmansk on the Barents Sea Aug. 18 destined to dock at the Syrian Mediterranean port of Tartus
    Saturday, Aug. 23. It includes the Russian Navy’s biggest missile cruiser Moskva and at least four nuclear missile
    submarines

    At the Black Sea resort of Sochi, Syrian president Bashar Assad told reporters Thursday, Aug. 21, that he is considering
    a Russian request to deploy missiles in his country. He signaled he would also be representing Tehran’s interests in his
    talks with Russian leaders. Jordan’s King Abdullah was on his way to join them.
    Assad is reported by our sources as having given the nod for Tartus port’s conversion into a permanent Middle East
    base for Russia’s nuclear-armed warships. A large Syrian military delegation visited the Russian weapons
    manufacturing giant, the Kalinin Machines Plant, to inspect the sophisticated anti-air missile systems, including the S-
    300 and the BUK M, for which Damascus is bidding. Source : debka.com

    source:
    DAILY COLLECTION OF MARITIME PRESS CLIPPINGS 2008 – 221

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 437 total)