I suspect Russia will start PAK-FA exports well before 2025.
I’m doubtful of this but then recent trends in aerospace have not exactly promoted confidence in terms of expecting timely delivery.
I reckon F-35 will be released to these countries once Israel has a full allocation of its own and then probably downgraded (like initial Saudi F-15S (downgraded F-15E))..
This assumes continuation of US-Israeli relationship at current levels.
some factory in other country its crazy. you see grandmas working there!
I don’t see a problem with older women working in aerospace. It’s the 21st century after all and women should have same rights to employment as men and age should not be a discriminatory factor unless safety/performance issues arise.
so how many Mirage 2000s are there from the French to sell?
Don’t think they’re that marketable right now.
Main ones being retired are Mirage 2000Cs which are pretty much 1980s vintage. Not sure about airframes numbers available either:
124 delivered
– 12 to Brazil
– 20 destroyed
– 37 upgraded to Mirage 2000-5
– several turned to instructional airframes
= about 50 airframes remaining- all quite old and at least 25 still in service with Armee de l’ Air.
I could be wrong about above numbers.
M2000-5s are continuing to serve so not available yet – they are also older airframes.
M2000N are nuclear capable (so no export clearance without modification) and also quite old.
That leaves M2000D strike aircraft which will continue to serve with the French in the near future.
Off course can be done, but economic wise Mig 29 will be more appropriate for Vietnam in replacing Mig 21. Afterall if we are talking surplus, there are ample surplus Mig 29 on Rusian and Ukraine inventory plus appropriate refurbished and modification program.
Most of those surplus MiG-29S are 20-25 years old and need considerable upgrading.
Really, considering the resources likely available. I would say more Flankers and the best Air Defense Missile System they can afford from Russia.
This is the sane approach.
People talk about MiG-21 replacement but it should be noted that MiG-21s are already being replaced by Su-30.
Regarding performance of American aircraft in hot and sandy conditions, we should also mention that Kuwait has operated F/A-18s for two decades, Oman and Bahrain have F-16s. And many operators have flown F-5 for a long period of time as well.
Oh and the US flew there for decades too.
I think reasons for only European fightersare stronger contenders than American aircraft is as follows:
1. These countries are not authorised for F-35.
2. They can buy F-16 or F/A-18 or F-15 but probably view these types as less prestigious old technology.
3. Eurofighter and Rafale represent pinnacle of European aircraft design so are acceptable.
4. They do not want to be locked into a single supplier.
5. There’s probably some bribes there too.
Most Gulf airforces might operate super advanced kit but their air forces are in many ways rich boy’s clubs and show pieces for people who have more money than sense.
So the 4 planes in 30 seconds and 5 in 1 minute is propaganda.
It did seem implausible especially given that Hunters are small and fast flying targets. It would require extreme close formation to enable a single straffing run to hit all aircraft – any level of dispersal means that Alam would not have had time to turn his nose and acquire a target and then shoot them down.
So what exactly happened on 7/09/65?
Apparently plane was about to stall just before impact. Speed was too slow for landing too.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/san-francisco-plane-crash-pilots-alerted-plane-stall/story?id=19598352
How big are Vietnamese fighter regiments in terms of number of squadrons and aircraft?
I think upgraded surplus F-16s would be a good choice for MiG-21 replacement.
And for Uncle Sam it’s a political coup – show how they’re rebuilding ties with old foes, how committed USA is to defence of SE Asia etc.
I’ve heard both Qatar and Kuwait are waiting on UAE to make a decision as to M2000-9 replacement – though not sure how new F-16E/F order impacts on this.
If they want numbers, should go for something a bit cheaper than these two…
They can afford numbers regardless of type. Oil money means the sky’s the limit.
Yes it can. Consider the way the Germans used tanks in 1940, & compare it with how the French used them. There’s usually more than one way to use any particular set of gear.Not so simple. A military often decides on a method of operation, then gets what it needs to implement it. This may be a complete re-equipment, if resources allow, or adding relatively minor components to permit a different mode of use of existing kit.
Problem with Argentina is that they’re at least 3 and possibly 4 decades behind current trends and the military establishment seems stuck in 1982 in terms of mindset.
Organisational culture is critical.
I’ve heard similar rumours – 3 regiments (72 aircraft) of Su-30’s planned.
Definitely a contender for Su-35 and even Pak Fa (even if acquired via Sukhoi/HAL FGFA so as to not peeve PRC too much).
Article on Vietnamese Mi-24A ops.
http://defense-studies.blogspot.com.au/2012/09/vietnam-to-improve-us-rocket-equipped.html
Not well written but some interesting photos and comments.
Photos of more modern Hinds is not Vietnamese – rather some African state by the looks of it (look at roundel – Uganda?).
I’ve never seen any claims that Egyptian M5s were loaned to Iraq.
As far as I am aware, transfers of Egyptian AF or Egyptian produced/assembled equipment to Iraq included licence assembled Shenyang F-6, Chengdu F-7B and EMBRAER EMB-312 Tucanos but not M5s.
Even then I’ve not seen pictures of Iraqi F-6s, only MiG-19s in 1960s.