True but objectives were also less in first Iraq war. Removal of Iraqi army from Kuwait versus invasion and overthrow of all of Iraq in the second Iraq war.
There was allot of area bombing by formations of planes in the first Iraq war and that tactic was simply not used very much at all in second Iraq war.
If you approach first Iraq war with the same wide spread use of PGM as was present the second Iraq war. The required numbers of planes needed would still have been far less then were used regardless of the higher quality of Iraq’s military in first Iraq war.
It really isn’t a valid comparison as in 1991 Iraq had a functional if somewhat obsolete AD system, a functioning airforce and large numbers of troops on the field.
PGM’s might be more accurate but the large number of geographically dispersed targets means you still need a large number of planes.
there’s a little logical problem in your reasoning: if the fast jets are vulnerable, how come you consider the slow movers and helicopters as being more appropriated? they’re even more easy targets for AAA and MANPADs.
Cause they’re cheap to acquire and operate. They’re also more flexible e.g. can be used for training, recce or with some assault helicopters transport.
In both Syria and Libya, fast jets have proven to be just as vulnerable to AAA/SA-7 as helos due to need for operating at low altitudes.
As soon as MANPADS/SA-7 forces them higher, they become highly innacurate and impact of air power is negated unless you can load up on PGMs.
For many poorer countries, PGMs are out of the picture due to cost and technical expertise required.
Even Russia didn’t use PGMs in Georgia.
what is “silver bullet fleet” or “bullet fleet” means ?
Silver bullet fleet means small fleet designed to counter only highest possible threats whilst rest of fleet is less capable. Comes from hunting werewolves with silver bullets.
you forgot East Asia on your list in which China, Japan, South Korea will have 5th gen fighters. Taiwan a small possibility
Added my assessment of Eastern Asia – the one bright spot along with North America.
you forgot Turkey which will likely have some
In my mind I covered Turkey under Western Europe. And they will have at least 116 F-35s if current plans eventuate. Still not sold on success of indigenous program.
and Kazakhstan might have a small silver bullet fleet
If Moscow offers them. Currently only older model Su-27s have been shifted to Kazakhstan and then mainly as payment for continued usage of Baikonur Cosmodrome.
I doubt Argentina would ever buy Chinese, even under current regime. Even Russian equipment has been brought in extremely small numbers (some Su-29 aerobatic aircraft and a couple of Mi-8S).
Filipinos worked out they couldn’t afford an actual multi-role fighter so opted for a Lead In Fighter Trainer to try to rebuild fighter capability (F-5s were retired nearly 10 years ago without replacement).
I had read their choice was T/A-50, not F/A-50 but I could be wrong.
Also no firm order yet and given the nature of Filipino defence modernisation plans since 1995 (i.e. they just stay plans), I wouldn’t be surprised if they were never ordered.
My money is on ongoing circus and no decision to be made in next few years, especially as we have Rio de Janeiro Olympic Games coming up.
Olympic Games are stupidly expensive – indeed they sunk a Greek plan to buy 60 Eurofighters.
Hungary plans news airlifters and helicopters
French Mirage 2000C-5 crashes, pilot ejects with slight injuries
Apparently it was No 73 of EC 1/2 based at Base aérienne 116 Luxeuil-Saint Sauveu
Also a Mirage F1CR lost it’s canopy ( http://www.sudouest.fr/2013/06/05/un-mirage-transforme-en-cabriolet-1074666-3.php )
– pics here: http://pics-aeronef.discutfree.com/t22p890-dassault-mirage-f1
Argentina plans to buy 12 Mirage F1 and retire Mirage III/V in 2014
Squestration likely to continue through 2014
Bad news for US operational readiness.
What is clear is that Brazil isn’t that interested in acquiring new fighters.
43 A-1M AMX are scheduled to serve to 2032 (modernisation in period 2013-2017).
57 F-5EM/FMs are currently being delivered with similar sort of lifespan. 11 of these were recently delivered from Jordanian stocks.
12 x Mirage 2000 expire in late 2013 and no overhauls seem planned. By the looks of it Mirage 2000 goes way of dodo.
Clearly the Brazillians think upgraded F-5/AMX/EMB-314 combo supported by tankers (KC-767) and AWACS (EMB-145 R-99) is sufficient for their needs.
French Guyana hve Charles de Gaule’s Rafale and potentialy M2K, Typhoon etc… 😉
Yes but the French aren’t lining up to invade Brazil now? Nor do they base fighter aircraft in Latin America on a permanent basis.
Brazil needs range and low offensive rcs.
Range for airpolicing but why offensive RCS? See below for Venezuela.
Venezuela is potentially the first big mess of Sth Am for the 21st century. Certainly a test for the ones with global ambitions-> hence range and low rcs
Chavez is dead.
Venezuela’s future is uncertain and it’s more likely that it will have some sort of implosion than some Argentina 1982 style assault on it’s neighbours.
And Brazil certainly didn’t intervene last time Venezuela imploded in 1992 and F-16’s were shooting down OV-10 Broncos or in 2002.
Most likely Venezuela will stabilise and return to some sort of normality (i.e. nominal democracy with narco terrorism, corruption, high crime, dodgy politicians etc).
And there is no [more?]Narco terro threat in Br
Brazillian Air Force was involved in LGB strikes against drug smuggling air strips as late as November 2011 (Operation Agata 2 and 3).
Not to mention Brazil’s AF has AWACS etc.
F-16 is more than sufficient as is JAS-39.
Rafale is overkill in an environment where the main treat is narco terrorists and where:
a.) Most neighbouring countries don’t have fighter planes (Bolivia, Paraguay, Uruguay, Guyana, Suriname, French Guinea)
b.) Neighbouring countries that do have fighter planes generally field 3rd generation (Argentina, Colombia) or have small basic 4th generation fleets (Peru)
c.) Only Venezuela operates small numbers of advanced 4th generation aircraft but not enough for power projection.
With COIN, it seems the light turboprop trainer (mainly EMB-314 Super Tucano) and helicopter gunship (primarily Mi-35 Hind) are the modern weapon of choice.
In Libya and Syria fast movers without PGMs have proven to be very vulnerable even to old fashioned AAA as they are performing old fashioned low level strafing/bombing runs.
You’ve got to find someone willing to incur the economic wrath of China. Europeans don’t seem to want to play that game.
Korea has never operated a non-US fighter and I don’t think that’ll change now.
About the only country that is a potential buyer of Rafale or Eurofighter in whole of East and SE Asia is Malaysia.
The rest are all either firmly with US or firmly with Russia and have been for decades.
Personally my money is with F-15.
Again this is in your opinion. And besides, Bidens visit to Brazil to attempt to secure a SH sale is very much a relevent piece of history in the Brazilian fighter jet story that has been playing out over the years so it would follow that this is most certainly a piece of news worth reporting.
Given that Brazillian fighter procurement process has been a joke with no real government commitment, Biden flogging off F/A-18E/F is mere marketing.
Brazil’s commitment to it’s airforce’s teeth has been F-5EM/FM and AMX upgrades.
M2000’s are expiring at end of 2013 and we’ve not yet heard about any overhaul of these either.
Given no Argentinian pilots are flying Mirage III/V for at least a year now, training probably won’t be “minimum.”
Plus there’s incorporation of a new type into the logistics systems, developing tactics for them, developing training programs, incorporating them into current defence structure, training maintainers etc. All takes time and money.
Incorporating news types is always challenging and time consuming. Even with JF-17, PAF is only up to 2 squadrons since induction in 2010. And that’s for home manufacturer air force with urgent need for new fighters.
Tens of billions are needed not just for fighter aircraft but for training, weapons, ships, transport aircraft, SAMs, MPAs etc.
As certain African countries can atest to, just buying equipment without creating a proper structure to operate them is a waste of tax payer dollars.

And even if Argentina wanted to buy 40 JF-17 and 4 ZDK and some S300s, where’s it going to find the money to do so?
Given dire economic conditions in Argentina, we might as well be debating equipping Mozambique’s Air Force with Flankers or Ireland’s Air Force with F-22s.