dark light

thobbes

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,246 through 1,260 (of 2,012 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The F-CK-1 IDF #2271833
    thobbes
    Participant

    Since when is Israel going to bomb UAE? Why would they do that?

    UAE pilots also have combat experience having flown missions during Libyan War. When’s the last time any PLAAF pilots got any combat experience? 1979 and then they performed badly!

    thobbes
    Participant

    Ink,

    I guess the talk of potential threats in medium/long term is unimaginative because of assumption that NATO will continue to exist in the future.

    NATO guarantees defence but it also limits action. Any offensive action against a neutral country could cause the offending party to be booted out of NATO, have sanctions placed on it and sabotage important economic links.

    Obviously investment is required for the future, especially as Serbia isn’t part of NATO.

    in reply to: The F-CK-1 IDF #2271853
    thobbes
    Participant

    In case you haven’t noticed Obama is really reluctant to get involved in Syria, especially after Libyan intervention saw warlordism take over in that country, strengthened Al Qaeda and has given them a base of operations for operations into other countries such as Mali.

    Turkish F-4 pilots “smashed” PLAAF/PLAN Su-27/J-11 pilots in 2010. That say’s it all.

    in reply to: F-35 Debate thread (2) #2271857
    thobbes
    Participant

    Old Carlo is somewhat paranoid to say the least. He’s been towing the same “Australia needs F-22” line since about 1997-98.

    It’s a poor analyst who doesn’t keep up with the times e.g. F-22 no longer in production, F-22 never available for export, F-22 isn’t truly multirole.

    Personally I think combo fleet of 72 F-35 + 24 F/A-18F + 12 E/A-18G + Wedgetail AWACS + KC-30A + 3 x Air Warfare Destroyers is a potent force for the future.

    in reply to: Pictures of new Libyan AF #2271870
    thobbes
    Participant

    New? The Libyan Air Force is just the same it was, the loss of some assets and some cosmetic changes doesn’t make it “new”.

    Oh well new roundels anyway.

    Anyone know whether Gaddafhi era traditions and lineage being retained?

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News and Updates #2271875
    thobbes
    Participant

    Thanks for all the info guys.

    The Spanish and Italian air arms are two of Europe’s most fascinating due to mix of aircraft they fly and due to their interesting histories.

    in reply to: Australian defence cuts short lived…. #2271879
    thobbes
    Participant

    They’re still plugging the daft 12 submarines line – though that makes sense as the Australian Submarine Corporation is a Labor Party jobs creation scheme for South Australia and Labor is all about unprofitable work creations schemes (I stupidly voted for them in 2007).

    They’ve struggled getting those 6 Collins class subs operational or fully manned, and now they’re going for 12.

    Personally I would’ve brought another 3 destroyers instead and have them installed with Tomahawk cruise missiles.

    That’s a far better deterrent than 12 “dry dock queen” submarines that probably won’t work.

    in reply to: The F-CK-1 IDF #2271888
    thobbes
    Participant

    Given a UAE pilot and a PLAAF pilot, I’d say it’s a fare contest.

    Chuck an Israeli or American into either jet and that’s your winner.

    As for end of Western imperial domination and Syria, Syria has nothing to do with Russia/China and everything to do with Western war weariness and the situation in Syria spiralling into sectarian violence with a large splash of Al Qaeda thrown in.

    If the US wanted, it could smash the Syrians with ease. After all the Israelis fly over Syrian air space with absolute impunity.

    in reply to: is there a market for USED Gripen and USED Typhoon? #2272306
    thobbes
    Participant

    Totally agree Ananda. Quantity does matter.

    in reply to: The F-CK-1 IDF #2272307
    thobbes
    Participant

    I’m much the same when it comes to exercises.

    I doubt the Chinese would risk a slapping around though – too much bad PR.

    thobbes
    Participant

    Weren’t some of Slovakia’s MiG-29s delivered in 1990s. Were these old Soviet ones or part of the massive cancelled Iraqi order?

    thobbes
    Participant

    Iraq used MiG-23ML/MF and possibly MLA against Iran and USA as well as MS and BN.

    Iraqi pilots scored kills against Iranian F-14s.

    Sheytanalkabir can clarify this.

    in reply to: The F-CK-1 IDF #2272318
    thobbes
    Participant

    The US has vast fleets of A-10’s, AV-8B’s, F-15’s, F-16’s, and F/A-18’s. Which, the majority will be replaced in the next 10-20 years. China has an even more aggressive plan and more resources available to replace its fleet. Sorry, your logic is not holding up………

    It’s not my logic. The proof is in the fact that 60% of PLAAF’s regiments are equipped with obsolete J-7/J-8/Q-5.

    As for aggressiveness of procurement, China has taken delivery of about 750 modern aircraft since 1991 (250 J-10, 240 Su-27/J-11, <150 JH-7, 100 SU-30) as well as ongoing deliveries of obsolete J-7/J-8 and Q-5.

    Since 1991, USAF replaced A-7, F-4G, F-111 F-16A/B, F-14, A-6 and large chunks of F/A-18A/B and F-15C/D fleets with 187 F-22, 500+ E/F/A-18E/F/G , several hundred F/A-18C/D and several hundred F-16C/D-40/50 and additional F-15Es (total of 230 aircraft up to 2001).

    So USAF recapitalised majority of it’s entire fleet in period 1990-2000 and USN is recapitalising now again.

    China has been unable to recapitalise even 50% of its fighter fleet with modern 4th generation aircraft in 23 years! In fact it’s mainstay is still a MiG-21 derivative.

    And everything in the current US fleet is overkill on an J-7/J-8/Q-5 and is a match for J-10 and most likely earlier model Flankers.

    True, yet much of India Defense Force is based on Russian Equipment and China also access too! Plus, China has not problem stealing what it wants. Something India is not likely to do! Sadly advantage “CHINA”.

    Advantage USA and allies.

    Do you have a source???

    Look up Anatolian Eagle 2010. Turkish F-4E dominated PLAAF Su-27s, though there was a lot of excuses made by China apologists – pilots were PLAN, pilots were from second rate regiments, exercise never happened etc.

    Here’s an article on the Exercise

    http://www.jamestown.org/single/?no_cache=1&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=37369

    http://www.aviationweek.com/blogs.aspx?plckblogid=blog:27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckpostid=blog:27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7post:0e6adb06-e48a-408b-bc4e-1262eeee7fdc

    China like India is gaining more access to Western Equipment by the day.

    Selling Boeings and Eurocopters is not selling them F-22s or your beloved F-35 now is it?

    in reply to: The F-CK-1 IDF #2272336
    thobbes
    Participant

    J-7s and J-8s as well as Q-5 aren’t being replaced that quickly.

    PLAAF – current regiments estimate:

    J-7 -25 + regiments (plus training/OCU/test)
    J-8 – 9 regiments (plus training/OCU/test)
    J-10 – 8 regiments (plus training/OCU/test)
    J-11-/SU-27 – 10 regiments
    Q-5 – 7 regiments
    Su-30 – 4 regiments
    JH-7 – 5 regiments

    So out of 70 odd regiments, about 60% are still equipped with older J-7, J-8 and Q-7 aircraft. More horrifically, 35% of all Chinese regiments are still equipped with J-7 variants (basically equivalent to modernised MiG-21MF or at worst a modernised MiG-21F-13)

    Also bear in mind whilst an average J-10 regiment is about 28 a/c, a Su-30MK regiment is less than 20 a/c whilst a J-7 reigment is anywhere up to 40 a/c.

    PLAN is a real mixed bag of types:

    1 regiment J-7E
    2 regiments J-8 – 1 converting to J-11
    1 regiment J-10
    1 regiment J-11 – 1 more converting
    1 regiment J-15 (forming)
    1 regiment Su-30MK2
    4 regiments JH-7 (Flying Leopard)

    So if ROC did get incorporated into the PRC, their aircraft would be a good contribution to retiring completely obsolete aircraft that given current rate of replacement will still be flying in the 2020-25 period.

    Though I doubt ROC will become part of China in the next 30-40 years.

    As a platform the J-10B is clearly the equal of the F-16 or M2000. You could argue Avionics and Weapons. Yet, most agree that China is closing the gap fast!

    In modern warfare it’s the weapons and avionics that matter.

    Also if that Anatolian Eagle exercise is anything to go by, PLAAF/PLAN pilots have a long way to go to being even close to a “Western” trained aviator.

    China would never have access to either the Mirage 2000 or Harrier. So, such a point is moot……….

    My point was China didn’t operate Western aircraft because it didn’t want to. In fact if such aircraft were available it probably would’ve purchased them, just like it did French helicopters and Russian equipment.

    in reply to: The F-CK-1 IDF #2272343
    thobbes
    Participant

    Firslty Taiwanese F-16A/Bs are closer to a Block 50 (hence unique Block 20 designation). They were called F-16A/B because USA did not want to be seen to be selling a more advanced F-16C/D to ROC.

    Secondly, all these Taiwanese aircraft are far more advanced than the J-7 and J-8 which still serve in many PLAAF/PLAN regiments and will probably continue to do so in the considerable future.

    Thirdly, what proof is there that a J-10B is better than an F-16 or M2000-5?

    Fourthly, PLAAF/PLAN has never operated Western because the West was never willing to provide them. Over the years, I’ve read of PLAAF/PLAN being interested in Mirage 2000 and from memoryAV-8.

    If Taiwan is integrated into PRC, then PRC automatically is gifted several hundred modern aircraft.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,246 through 1,260 (of 2,012 total)