dark light

press

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 366 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • press
    Participant

    And what’s “BBC POCCNN”?

    That`s VVS Russia…the Russian Airforce. I think that aircraft flew on May 9th the Victory Day Parade over St. Peter Square.

    in reply to: North Korean Air Force #2384126
    press
    Participant

    http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c339/fabe27/allegedlyNorthKoreanF-7MiG-21MF.jpg

    That picture is fake. That`s a Hungarian Airforce MiG-21.

    http://www.wings.hu/pics/5000.jpg

    in reply to: Romania may go for "free" F-16? #2399829
    press
    Participant

    er, why do you put my id as author of another poster’s quote? :confused:

    I apologize. It was a mistake which was corrected.

    in reply to: Romania may go for "free" F-16? #2399894
    press
    Participant

    Fear from Russian invasion is based on some facts:

    -from 1711 until 1944 Russians invaded us 18 times;
    -last time we also lost ~ 50,000 sq. km of territory together with ~ 1,800,000 ethnic Romanians; many of those were deported by Stalin in Siberia and Central Asia;
    -they impose an communist regime that transformed a rather prosperous country (per capita GDP in 1938 was higher than Greece or Portugal) into one of the least developed in Europe.

    But yes, to many it may seem paranoia.

    BTW, we weren’t always friends with US. In fact, for ~ half year in 1944 we clashed with USAAF (USAF ancestor). But today situation is different.

    Are you for real? In what reality are you living? Fear of Russian invasion? You really make me laugh. No one in Romania fears that. No one! I am certainly not afraid of that. Due to our bad relations with Russia we pay the most expensive price for natural gas in Europe.

    By your logic we should be afraid of the Turks, Hungarians, Tatars, Mongols, Italians, right? How many times did the Turks invaded Romania?

    Back on topic: I, as a Romanian tax payer, don`t want to pay for junk. The idea to exchange 30+ year old MiGs with 20+ year old Lawn Darts is just over my level of understanding. If we want to make agriculture with jet fighters, 2nd hand F-16s is the solution.

    I, as a Romanian tax payer, would pay for new aircraft knowing that in the long term military aviation won’t transform itself into comets killing good men.

    in reply to: Romania may go for "free" F-16? #2400495
    press
    Participant

    And how do you know that Romanians do not support US missile shiled ? I’m curious.

    I don’t.

    in reply to: Romania may go for "free" F-16? #2402589
    press
    Participant

    The (future) F 35 buy […] it will still be less expensive than EF/Rafale.

    Any basys for that assumption?

    in reply to: Romania may go for "free" F-16? #2413136
    press
    Participant

    I wonder how old ar these F-16 planes. The Lancers are around 30 years old.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2400106
    press
    Participant

    LOL….and the wars have started. It took off just yesterday and today there’s a hot debate about its construction and capabilities.

    Remember that the F-22 or 35 prototypes were quite different than the production models. Be sure that the T-50 will suffer a lot of modifications in the future before production is started.

    Please, allow the aircraft to evolve before judging it.

    Anyhow, I`ve got my popcorn ready. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2426875
    press
    Participant

    That’s why I am asking, because Zhukosky has a history with first flights.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2426888
    press
    Participant

    He also said “[we’re] also evaluating several locations for the first flight- either KnAAPO, or another place”.

    Do they plan to keep the first flight a secret also? Why is so important the location for the first flight?

    in reply to: Beautiful pics from ATLC in UAE #2427856
    press
    Participant

    No Rafale and Typhoon pictures?

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2427967
    press
    Participant

    One thing is for sure: if they wanna keep a secret, they can.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #12 #2441638
    press
    Participant

    RSAF T-33s again
    http://www.aircraftslides.com/Auction/AuctionDetail.aspx?ID=584531

    And for Gaubs, the oldest paintscheme of Romanian Alouette III: dark green with light blue-gray underside, white serial and the star type roundel used during 1950-1984.

    scan from the book “Warsaw pact Air Forces” by Hans-Heiri Stapfer, page 64

    The picture with the Romanian Alouette, could it be taken at Alexeni? The background (although it’s not much) is very familiar to me. I grew up on that base.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #12 #2441818
    press
    Participant

    UH-60 or S-76 or whatever, costs more because it has features the other machine doesn’t have.

    Such as?

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #12 #2441948
    press
    Participant

    Quality also comes with a price.

    I really don’t understand your point. Especially when talking about Mi-8/17 – which kinda is my terf. So being a cheap product it’s not that qualitative, right?

    Let me put it this way:
    does it do its job as it was designed? yes
    does it do its job in the most harshest environments (read Siberia)? yes
    is it cheap? yes
    is it easy to maintain? yes

    Why should I search for anything else? Why should I pay twice or more the price of a Mi-17 for the same or lesser capabilities?

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 366 total)