dark light

pagen01

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 9,672 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Trying to ID these 1930's RAF Aircraft/Airfields #1155362
    pagen01
    Participant

    Thanks bazv, I do use photobucket, but they seem to take ever-and-a-day to load up!

    Definately quicker (& IMO better) if you reduce photos to 800x? first, rather than using full resolution scans and digi pics.

    Re the F Sheds, I must stress that in the Wallace pic I’m reffering to the hangar on the left, unsure on type in foreground on right,looks like a C but it isn’t!
    You do find variations in F Shed finishes, as some of these hangars were relocated.
    As I say Cranwell definately had them, but not heard of them at Manston.

    Cracking pics by the way, nice to see Albemarles in unposed pics like that.

    in reply to: They're Proud of their New Rolls Royce Engine #1155072
    pagen01
    Participant

    Magneto cover marked WATFORD MAGNETO ROTAK? LONDON NW 10

    Rotax more likely, great pics again.

    in reply to: RR Griffon rival? #1152821
    pagen01
    Participant

    Yes that Lycoming is something else, especially given the product that they are most associated with!

    in reply to: RR Griffon rival? #1152828
    pagen01
    Participant

    The Americans seemed to have stuck mainly with large radial engines after the war which don’t seem to get the contra-prop treatment, one noteable (and troublesome!) exception being the R-4360 fitted to the XB-35 ‘Flying Wing’.
    The Griffon does seem to be fairly unique as a succesful in-line piston engine to power contra-props, possibly why it was in good demand for putting in the Reno racers etc.

    in reply to: RR Griffon rival? #1152864
    pagen01
    Participant

    was the napier sabre ever adapted to take contra rotating props?

    Yes, Sabre 118 (VIII?) only fitted and flown in the Folland 43/37 test bed.

    To the original question, don’t forget there was the contra-prop RR Merlins fitted to the Sturgeon.

    in reply to: Interesting engine test bed aircraft #1152685
    pagen01
    Participant

    To start the ball rolling here is Gannet AS.1 WN345 fitted with the ASDM Mk.8 engine that went into the AEW.3 version. Standard AS.1 WN395 is shown flying alongside

    I didn’t think it could be done, but WN345 is even more beautiful than a standard Gannet.

    This thread hasn’t come about from the mention of the Folland 43/37 test-bed in the Griffon post has it?!

    in reply to: Avro Vulcan XL319 Restoration Project #1151986
    pagen01
    Participant

    I really can’t believe the estimated snow weights and stress on U/C arguments in this post.
    That snow won’t be 19,000 pounds in weight, it would have to be highly compacted and almost solid ice throughout its depth to be anywhere near that. Going on theories here most house/hangar roofs would have collapsed in the current round of the weather.
    The Vulcan gears will stand all of this weight easily given it will be well under the maximum fuel, crew, and bomb load weight.
    As Madjock points out the nose gear is designed to be tethered and to support the weight of the aircraft securely. Even if you can’t secure through lower nose leg, then chains and turnbuckles close to the pivot point will help.

    in reply to: Got a Jaguar GR3 For Sale? #1149775
    pagen01
    Participant

    Not the first time that the MoD will be spending out alot more than what they sold valuable assets for.
    I know that they have just spent a fortune og getting a Jag canopy back.
    The sad thing is that not only are we paying for this as tax payers, but we are also paying for whole departments and staff whos sole purpose is to control disposals and requisitions on behalf of the RAF.

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread #1149192
    pagen01
    Participant

    very true, in the last couple of months alone there has also been a Flying Flea, Jet Provost 3, a Chippax and two AV-8 cockpits.

    credit crunch perhaps? or something deeper?

    either way, surely rich pickings for all those cockpit wannabes? :rolleyes:

    I think there is alot in that, when times are tight the toys most go, however the AV-8s are from a business, and some of the others significants are from a collection.

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread #1149046
    pagen01
    Participant

    I’d forgotten about that one!

    in reply to: DeHavilland Sea Vixen At Bruntingthorpe #1148622
    pagen01
    Participant

    I should have said ‘can’t think of many’, there was also a Sabre spin off with very similar to SV layout.

    in reply to: DeHavilland Sea Vixen At Bruntingthorpe #1148648
    pagen01
    Participant

    and the new windscreen frame

    That must have been quite a find, does the centre spine/frame get fixed on after the glazing?
    As a fighter it seems to have the worst windscreen layout possible, I cant think of another fighter with a frame running centrally down in front of the pilots view, very distinctive though.

    in reply to: DeHavilland Sea Vixen At Bruntingthorpe #1148424
    pagen01
    Participant

    in answer to your question yes there is a joining strip between the two front windscreen pieces and that joining strip is wooden

    Blimey, is that standard?

    in reply to: Clinging to life at Predannack #1147246
    pagen01
    Participant

    I haven’t got any, and that is the grey area, but follow the contact details provided and they should know more.
    hope it works out

    in reply to: Clinging to life at Predannack #1147262
    pagen01
    Participant

    Speak to the guy in charge of the School of Aircraft Handling at Culdrose (I will PM you his number), he is very accomodating visits and info wise, but getting parts out is a very different thing, and likely to draw a blank.
    The Harriers are still on charge of HMS Sultan.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 9,672 total)