dark light

12jaguar

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,486 through 1,500 (of 1,773 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Prodded C130s #1202939
    12jaguar
    Participant

    Aren’t the C-130J’s able to be ‘prodded’ ???

    IIRC, the refueling probe is a role fitment – and attaches to the port upper fuselage when needed.

    Correct, the probes on the J are a bolt on affair, IIRC they’ve not been cleared for flight in the J Release to Service document, but I may be wrong.

    John

    in reply to: Chatham Islands Sunderland remains again #1204763
    12jaguar
    Participant

    Is that a booking for here then?

    19th / 20th June 2010 – Cockpit or a rig?:diablo:

    You naughty man:D

    in reply to: Chatham Islands Sunderland remains again #1204786
    12jaguar
    Participant

    hi Cees

    If the Project will pay my way, I’ll go and survey it myself!

    seriously though, I may be wrong, but I don’t think that the wings are that similar between the types, I stand to be corrected though. That cockpit would sure be impressive at Newark next year though:diablo:

    in reply to: Canberras WD954/WT525 together #1205200
    12jaguar
    Participant

    Best of luck with the restoration and I’m really glad that Richy is still going to be involved. I know what a basket case this ac is and I can’t think what possessed the individual who sectioned her to cut where he did!:eek:

    regards

    john

    in reply to: Aircraft Fatigue Life #1206382
    12jaguar
    Participant

    To follow on from the previous post, FI is most commonly calculated from fatigue testing of the airframe assembly which is tested to destruction. That’s where the number crunching comes in and the designer will apply a Factor of Safety (FOS)to the component life. If a structure fails at 18,000 repetitions of applied stress a FOS (commonly 3) would be applied to give a ‘safe’ life of 6000 repetitions.

    For Military aircraft the means of operation can accrue more FI depending on the operating environment. A good example of this is the Valiant which was designed to operate at high altitudes with a more benign flight regime and suffered spar fatigue problems when switched to low level operations, where more violent manouevres were needed.

    in reply to: Jet Fuel Question? #1208233
    12jaguar
    Participant

    According to Def Stan 01-5 this is equivalent to F-35 (Avtur without FSII – Fuel System Icing Inhibitor). As for future use it would depend on where it was going to be used, but to be honest unless sediment and water checks were stringently carried out I wouldn’t rely on it for a flying aircraft.

    John

    in reply to: First Cockpitfest 09 Details #1213006
    12jaguar
    Participant

    My first overnighter at Newark, a suntan on me bonce and great conversations with all and sundry. For once I didn’t clean out the bank balance and I’ve been spurred on by all the great work that’s taken place. For my money all the winners were well deserved but I think that Matt and Sean should be singled out for the great work they’ve done on turning their Canberra around in such a short space of time.

    I now have another full order book for Chippy panels so please don’task me to make any more as I’m beginning to see them in my sleep!:diablo:

    Thanks to all at the Museum for making us all so welcome

    John

    in reply to: Cockpitfest Wish List #1218560
    12jaguar
    Participant

    Well I won’t be there but Jaguar parts can be passed on to 12jaguar or XM692 for me, that is unless they like the parts themselves. Mainly after bungees, HUD controller, TACAN, LOX gauge and nav hand controller, oh and also an early weapons aiming mode panel.

    Cheers Paul

    Just to reiterate

    I will be there with Chipmunk WP927, if there are any Jag parts that Pauls after please let me know and I can either hold on to them for him or put you in contact with him

    cheers

    John

    in reply to: Cockpitfest Wish List #1224142
    12jaguar
    Participant

    on the look out for anything ww2 mainly:
    -anything related to RAF gun turrets.
    -ww2 wireless equipment.
    -ww2 navigation equipment.

    for possible cockpit section mock ups.

    What mock ups have you got in mind?

    in reply to: Help identifying part #1227089
    12jaguar
    Participant

    Looks very similar to the jacking plate of a BAe 146 used for levelling when raising the a/c on jacks

    That mirrors one of the options, but I think it’s unlikely due to the location where it was found, but you never know:confused:

    in reply to: Help identifying part #1227172
    12jaguar
    Participant

    Hi All

    The chap who originally raised the question on this part has had a number of options given to him from various sources as follows:

    1) A piece from a V-1 that impacted near that area.

    2) Something to do with a drift angle computer on board the B-24.

    3) A plate used to calibrate the aircraft guns.

    4) A plate used with aircraft levelling.

    5) Something to do with bomb fusing.

    6) Type 2000 V.D.U. screen for `Jostle` airborne jamming.

    My view is to agree with Option 6 as put forward by the experts on here. If anyone has a definitive picture of this item in service so that we can put this to bed, it would be very much appreciated.

    cheers

    John

    in reply to: Lancaster #1228647
    12jaguar
    Participant

    yep, she flew over Wyton just before hand:D

    in reply to: Stirling Project Update #1162604
    12jaguar
    Participant

    As promised here are a few pictures of some new items that we’ve made over the last few months whilst we’ve been without our workshop. On that front the MOD have really done us proud and given us 2 fully refurbished rooms within the same hangar. We’ve had a lot of sorting out to do and we’re finally getting sorted although it’ll still be a few weeks before we’re up to speed again. Anyway the pictures are of the Pilot/Co-pilot seat adjusters and assorted castings for control column base shroud, rudder pedal adjuster housing and seat rails. I’ve also posted a few photos of some of our artefacts on Hindenburg’s Stirling Bits thread if you’re interested.

    John

    in reply to: Cockpit photo WW2 Stirling Sunderland?? #1164340
    12jaguar
    Participant

    Not Stirling methinks

    in reply to: Electric Vs Hydraulic? #1171362
    12jaguar
    Participant

    IIRC the Stirling had electrically actuated u/c and it was terribly unreliable and having refurbished one of the gearboxes, unnecessarily heavy. lThe manual lowering of the u/c works in almost exactly the same way as the Herc in that a locking pawl is disengaged allowing a handle to be rotated. A job to be given to the lowliest member of the crew/erks (delete as applicable:diablo:)

Viewing 15 posts - 1,486 through 1,500 (of 1,773 total)