dark light

donno21

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 12 posts - 31 through 42 (of 42 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hawker Hunter in 2010 #2391645
    donno21
    Participant

    Northern Lights rings a bell. I believe that FSI did some flight testing for them while we were still flying F-100’s. I think they had a plan to buy the target operations. I do know they visited us at Farnborough. and were agast at the maint. recquirments for the “HUN”. Think they had acquired at least 1 F-104 and thought it would work as a Dart Tow aircraft.

    in reply to: Huns in the 70's & 80's – 2nd #2399447
    donno21
    Participant

    No pictures with Shrikes, but was not an uncommon load. No chaff, no flares. Did have RHAW gear.

    in reply to: Huns in the 70's & 80's – 2nd #2400508
    donno21
    Participant

    Don’t visit the site often, so I just found the F-100 topic. Having worked the “D & F” models in SEA, thought I would throw in my 2 cent’s worth. As Phantom said, it (F-model) worked very well as an early Weasel and performed supurbley in the “Misty” role. I was involved with both roles, (maint. wise) and finished my Viet-Nam time as MX Supervisor for the “Misty” flight. It was not the easiest aircraft to maintain, many tasks recquired aft section removal or engine roll- backs. The drag chute system was straight from the stone-age, it ate tires and brakes at an alarming rate, but I never heard a pilot complain of bad handling problems or “un-commanded inputs”, she was solid, tough and heavy.It could have used more motor, but it could have used a weight reduction as well. It did not “decelerate” well on landing,thusly a drag chute that functioned properly was a must, but the brakes still got VERY warm, even with the most experienced pilots, so they wore out quickly. Years later when I retired and was emplyed by Flight Systems Inc. I AGAIN worked the “F’s” used for Dart Tow from Deci, and deplyoede to Germany. These were former DAF “Huns” purchased by FSI along with some from Turkey. 2 planes, 3 mechs,3 sorties a day, we changed an A/B ignitor (with the aft section on) and returned to Farnborogh un- eventfully.

    in reply to: Air Start Pod #1096436
    donno21
    Participant

    I was at Farnborough in ’91 working for Flight systems Inc on our F-100’s. We had a Pod that we used while there, but I can’t recall if it belonged to us or Farnborough. Perhaps you could check with the folks there or contact Flight Systems, (now BAE Flight Systems @ Mojave Ca). I believe their F-100’s have been removed from service, (we used them for Dart Tow Ops, not the drones). Could be the pods are lying about Mojave Airport.

    in reply to: Combat Flight Simulator 3: A New Era #220724
    donno21
    Participant

    where can I purchase CFS?

    in reply to: Red Eagles: book opinion? #2414156
    donno21
    Participant

    Red Eagles book & Constant Peg

    Glad to see Bandit 42’s post and sure hope it clears up some issues. I find it clear cut and honest, no BS. All though we were there at different times and he was flying MiG’s that I had helped rebuild, I appreciate his input and hope others do as well. Oh yeah, don’t know if it’s ever been mentioned, but our motto was “The Ultimate in Air Combat”. MX wise, we called ourselves the Hallmark Gang”. (When you care enough to send the very best).

    in reply to: Why no F-100 for the Luftwaffe ? #2434606
    donno21
    Participant

    Why no F-100 for the Luftwaffe

    Having had experience (Maintenance) on the F100 D and F, it would not have been the best choice for the new Luftwaffe. It wasnt an air to air contender,had good guns, very thirsty at speed / low altitude. Not easy to maintain. I worked D’s and F’s in SEA (Misty Flight @ Phu Cat) and when I worked for Flight Systems Inc we acquired a bunch of D’s & F’s from Turkey and Denmark. The F’s had been USAF, then to France, then to Denmark. Engines / airframes unmodified,user’s choice on avionics. Big difference was they had Martin Baker seats. We towed targets for the Germans @ Deci and Witmund, did our overhauls and major inspections at Farnbourgh, UK. If I recall correctly,we got only D’s from Turkey. It earned its place as a bomb dropper in SEA.

    in reply to: Red Eagles: book opinion? #2434635
    donno21
    Participant

    Red Eagles book & Constant Peg

    Been reading / re-reading since Steve Davies informed me there were some “less than favorable” comments from people who werent there (TTR). I was there from Day 1. We were tasked with maintaining the Fleet of MiGs to provide exposure and “Buck Fever”prevention to U.S. pilots / aircrews. We did not evaluate the MX proceedures,nor did we operate as a WP Unit would. That was not our purpose. We copied no one and didnt try to be anything out of the ordinary. It kinda’ boils down to”whats the best way to kill a MiG? Lets get some, fly them and figure it out.Keep in mind PLEASE that MX guys are NOT FIGHTER PILOTS and by the same token, Fighter Pilots are NOT MX GUYS. Rarely could the two species agree 100% on the good vs bad points of a given piece of equipment. As for MX, of all the assets, the 21 was my favorite. relatively simple, dependable, didnt take much time to turn and had no really bad features. IMO, the 23 was not that great and had some issues. I wouldnt call it a piece of crap,but it was close.If some out there are offended, too bad.

    in reply to: German Luftwaffe Pics and Infos #2464457
    donno21
    Participant

    I was TDY to Wittmund,towing targets for JG 71 Phantoms. In a hangar they had a Spanish ME-109 that was being refurbished. Has it ever flown? With the Phantoms?

    in reply to: US Air Force declassifies elite aggressor program #2464461
    donno21
    Participant

    Yeah, I have kids, grown ‘n gone. They could tolerate being corrected, and did not talk a bunch of crap about subjects they werent knowledgable of. I dont / didnt mean to offend anyone, just stating facts.

    in reply to: US Air Force declassifies elite aggressor program #2475804
    donno21
    Participant

    Just stating the facts. If someones feelings were hurt, tough. I choose to not tolerate individuals that speak of things they know nothing of. I was there.

    in reply to: US Air Force declassifies elite aggressor program #2492700
    donno21
    Participant

    US Air Force declassifies elite Agressor program

    Let me introduce myself and present my credentials. I am a retired USAF Msgt,22 years on active duty.I was the #2 Enlisted maintenance man when the 4477th was organized under Constant Peg. My name is Don Lyon(aka “Uncle Don”) I know MiGs, period. I have communicated with Steve Davies VIA E-Mail and ‘phone, and believe what he has written to be very accurate. I only found this site today, and after digesting it for a while, realize the vast majority of you pukes dont know the difference between the pointy end of a MiG VS the sooty end. What idiot stated the aircraft were poorly maintained should have his private parts dipped in Skydrol while they are still attached. We had no maintenance manuals, but made up checklists as we went along and these were constantly revised / updated. What we did have a vast supply of was TALENT.There was a lot of “reverse engineering” and late night bull sessions that pooled the days lessons learned into a program we could work with. At times we were lucky enough to talk to the previous owners / operators and pick their brains for any info we could use. The Officers were of a caliber unknown to most Air Force folks, not only the Pilots, but GCI controllers as well. Seen many of them do a lot of things their counterparts would cringe at. Same with enlisted, not just the Crew Chiefs, AGE mechanics, Avionics, just a very talented, dedicated group. Best assignment ever, no doubt about it.So you “know it all pukes” out there,keep your mouth shut concerning things you know nothing of. Questions? I’m available. Complaints? Sorry, complaint dept. is closed.

Viewing 12 posts - 31 through 42 (of 42 total)