dark light

Short finals

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 252 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: a quick question about lenses #448809
    Short finals
    Participant

    I assume you are talking about a zoom lens. Even a 200mm will give you a pretty good “reach” as this is equivalent to about 300mm on a film camera. It all depends on what you’re going to shoot, and how close you expect to be to the aircraft. Airliners are large, warbirds and GA are small…….. A 300mm does increase your options, though.

    in reply to: Hastings MOGCB at Changi in 1962 #1197143
    Short finals
    Participant

    Back in the 60/70s there were a quite few RAF aircraft(various types) – mainly from Boscombe Down, that regularly overflew me (living 10m South of the old IBY (Ibsley) VOR) that used the M-xxxx Radio callsigns on Civil VHF airways frequencies.

    Haven’t heard an M-xxxx callsign now though for probably 25 years or more..

    Two that I can remember off the top of my head are:

    MPDXA was Comet XV814
    MPRHA was Britannia XX367

    in reply to: New Cargo startup B737-200 #500665
    Short finals
    Participant

    Not only does she look immaculate but if memory serves my correct, this 37 was delivered to Aer Lingus as it’s a -248 cust model, and also the old telecoms wire from the rear to the tail a dead give a way for an early production airframe, this is one old girl looking pretty good for her age.

    The communications wire you mention is the antenna for HF (short-wave) radio, which is no doubt needed for operations in parts of South America and Africa where VHF coverage can be limited. This was not fitted to EI-ASE during its Aer Lingus service, as the aircraft spent its time on intra-European services.

    in reply to: Lightning pilot- Ian Black #1238873
    Short finals
    Participant

    As far as I know he flies for an airline of some description and as Lindy’s Lad rightly points out he is now back current on the Lightnings at Thunder City in SA.

    John.

    Usually reported as being with Virgin Atlantic on A340s.

    in reply to: Type and Series Please? #1162964
    Short finals
    Participant

    AFAIK there was a problem with certifying it in the UK (maybe because of cockpit differences from the UK certification standard; it had also spent most of its life as a corporate machine with Tenneco) and so Alidair disposed of it to Far Eastern Air Transport, after which it ended up with Bouraq in Indonesia. As PK-IVS it crashed on 26 August 1980 after the starboard elevator detached from the aircraft in flight.

    in reply to: R.A.E. Farnborough Fairchild Packet #1169219
    Short finals
    Participant

    pagen01….I originally thought the ground shot was a C-82 from the squareness of the door frame…..I still think the flying shot is a C-119…..there are no ‘lightening’ holes in the top horizontal door frame and there are no fin extensions below the booms (there are photos of C-119Cs like that)

    Jim Jobe thanks for the precise info on the C-82s and C-119s seconded to the UK

    The ground shot is definitely a C-82 – note that it has three-bladed props and you can also just make out that the main undercarriage is of the single-wheel type, unlike the C-119, which had two wheels on each side.

    in reply to: Classsic Trident pics in colour. #487129
    Short finals
    Participant

    It was the livery of the time and most, if not all, types in the fleet had it – 1-11s. Vanguards, Viscounts and Comets among others.

    in reply to: Eithad #506719
    Short finals
    Participant

    The accident had nothing to do with Etihad, as far as I recall, and of course the airline had not taken delivery of the aircraft (and never will). In my opinion the report you posted used the term “Arab” in the same way as in another era the term “Black” might have been used.

    in reply to: Ryanair to go long haul with 787 #507985
    Short finals
    Participant

    Not a day goes by without Ryanair getting some free publicity with some statement or other and it is readily lapped up and spread across the Internet by willing assistants….!

    in reply to: G-ZAPW Royal Mail? #508091
    Short finals
    Participant

    G-ZAPV has been in this scheme for some time – so it appears that G-ZAPW has received the same colours(?)

    http://www.airliners.net/photo/Royal-Mail-(Titan/Boeing-737-3Y0/1084974/M/

    in reply to: Ex-Australian Air Force 707 mystery #1209156
    Short finals
    Participant

    The official G-INFO wesite does not show any reservation of G-RAAF – is there another source for this?

    in reply to: Help to identify a C82 Packet #1221986
    Short finals
    Participant
    in reply to: Help to identify a C82 Packet #1222003
    Short finals
    Participant

    The only C-82 ending in “829” was 45-57829. According to Al Lloyd’s C-82/C-119 history (published by Aerofax) it was later sold as N6235C to a company called LEBCA International of Miami. Fl. It appears to have been struck off the US Civil Register in 1977: http://www.airport-data.com/aircraft/N6235C.html

    in reply to: Lufthansa Connie #1224342
    Short finals
    Participant

    I saw the Breitling in its former colours in Ireland once (Shannon or Dublin, can’t remember).

    Lovely looking….

    I think you must be mistaken, as it has never visited this country. The lovely MATS C-121 Constellation did visit Dublin in 1998 though, on its return flight from Europe to the USA.

    in reply to: Aer Lingus plunges into the red!!! #513748
    Short finals
    Participant

    Aer Lingus has the benifit of cutting back services/routes and storing aircraft, where as Zoom operated with a much tighter operation. Additionaly, Aer Lingus has the benifit of the Irish Government stepping in if things really get bad.

    Actually Ryanair owns a larger share of Aer Lingus now than does the Irish Government. It’s interesting to ponder what they would do if Aer Lingus was in serious trouble!

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 252 total)