[QUOTE=Whiskey Delta]
6. Everyone assuming that every pilot is making $200,000 a year and work 10 days a month.
QUOTE]
OH, I thought we all are. Only kidding. 😀 😀 😀 😀 😀 😀 😀
The B777 has the same auto checklist.
Best, Hong Kong.
In my company, all visual approaches should be backed up with an ILS etc as a form of identification. With the correct arrival and approach plates in front of them and the correct NAV aids tuned I find it a little lax that this happened. But hey, we are all human and mistakes do happen.
What about the security at the air force bases?? A plane makes an approach and landing without permission. Some heads will roll.
😮
I though Jersey was quite nice for a small airport.
LAX, it’s a zoo. So over crowded and the security and bag screening is a nightmare. You have to queue up to get your bags x-rayed then wait to identify them before queuing up to check in.
Wysiwyg,
Just repeating what I’ve been told by alot of my friends who are flying the 320..They say it doesn’t take long to figure it out, but personally I don’t understand what the advantage of designing the flight controls to do that are…why not just design them to act like normal flight controls? too many engineers in the mix, and not enough pilot input. I see it alot with avionics and “switchology” I sometimes wonder why things are designed in such a way…its obvious a pilot was not consulted…Keep it simple!
Good luck on your training.
TTP
TTP,
I have to agree with you. In my company we operate A340/330 and B744 and B777. I talk a lot with the guys who have flown both Airbus and Boeing and just about all of them say the like both types but the airbus is too much like flying a computer where as they can feel part of the Boeings. To many people think that the Airbus is more technically advanced than Boeings….I feel people don’t know too much about the B777 then. It has all the gizmos of Airbus but it’s still a pilot’s aircraft and boy does it perform.
LAX….not fun.
Well if he was supposed to rely on outside visual clues….what do they do if it’s a low visibility departure????????????Make no sense to me at all.
Well the forum has become a lot better than a couple of months ago….but as you say, some pointless threads still around. I don’t see the need for polls such as “what is your busiest terminal at you local airport” and the signatures which tell us which flights you have been on, a complete waste of bandwidth.
But we are going in the right direction.
Hmm
Airbus: A spoiled child having a tantrum because things aren’t going the way it wants them to go.
The thing about the weight is utter crap. Boeing have a long long history of exceeding their targets. They were doing so 30 years before Airbus was established, they continue doing so and will go on doing so.
Airbus are the opposite, they have a history of barely meeting and sometimes failing the targets they set out in regards to weights and performance. Airbus know this, they know that the A380 is already overweight and are probably worried.
Yes, definately a strop by airbus. Expect a counter claim by Boeing soon
spot on B55.
But surely the tower controller would have know the plane was there, calling for clearance taxi etc, any morse code clickity messages or whatever would not be neccessary?
Quite simple…the tower might have been closed. This is the reason we have pilot activated lights.
In the USA you can fly where you want and at what ever time you want…It’s excellent. No worries about trying to get back before the airfield closes.
yep, great shots.
Thats new, since when have pilots been able to switch on runway lights?
In many parts of the world like USA and Aus the pilot can activate the runway lights by clicking the R/T button a certain number of times. You also can control the light intensity.
When I used to fly in the USA we would fly over a known airfield, dial up the tower freq and click away….and suddenly the whole airfield was light up. It was quite a cool sight. 😀
great again WD, nice seeing the E 170 .