dark light

Steve Touchdown

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 766 through 780 (of 812 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Let's get some trivia out… oh no… another quiz! #2695431
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Ooops I shoulda checked first, ewh? :rolleyes:

    It was in fact Indonesian, Arthur…and 29th October not last month at all!

    H-3408 of Skadron Udara 6 TNI-AU, apparently.

    So that’s one we’ll never catch-up with.

    Cheers

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    P.S. You got me on the Twin Bastan. Interesting that the thinking behind this resulted in the Puma, apparently.

    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Touché, Glitter!

    Maybe that’s why I was asking :p

    But from what I hear the deck’s not big enough to turn them around…so what happens next!?

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Let's get some trivia out… oh no… another quiz! #2695473
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Re: Re: Good going so far!

    Originally posted by Distiller
    -13-
    The Wessex is a well-known turbine variant of the Sikorski S58/H-34. Name two other turbine-powered Chocktaws.
    Distiller, those are all regular piston-powered helos. However, some were modified and recieved another designation/nickname, including some still in military use to this day. I’m looking for those.
    >>> that French H-34B with two Bastan engines, S-58T with PT6 TwinPac

    Now I never knew that….but it seems as though Sud Aviation only produced two prototypes back in 1962, and it never made it into production. Not sure of the designation either, because as far as I know, SA only built the H-34A and HSS-1 under licence.

    Is this the one you meant, Art? Seems a little obscure even for you!! :p

    Steve ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Let's get some trivia out… oh no… another quiz! #2695499
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Re: Good going so far!

    Originally posted by Arthur
    [B]
    -12-
    What biplanes are in use with what NATO countries?
    The An-2 is correct, but the Baltic states aren’t in NATO yet. So another operator. Also, Greece has been mentioned but not with the correct aircraft.

    -13-
    The Wessex is a well-known turbine variant of the Sikorski S58/H-34. Name two other turbine-powered Chocktaws.
    Distiller, those are all regular piston-powered helos. However, some were modified and recieved another designation/nickname, including some still in military use to this day. I’m looking for those.

    12: An-2 Poland
    Greece: Grumman AgCat

    13: S-58T Twin Pack (Taiwan crashed one last month)

    Hmmmmm…..another one, eh? I know the Seabat wasn’t….

    Steve ~ Touchdown-News

    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Does anybody know what happens to the E-2C Hawkeyes once they’ve landed and taken the wire on the CdG? 😀

    Maybe this could have gone in the quiz section instead.

    Let’s put it this way…I’d hate to be 25 miles out and on bingo fuel when a Hawkeye traps… :p

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Originally posted by mike currill
    Typical of any labour government – reduce the strength of the forces and then wring their hands and whine about lack of manpower when something kicks off.

    I suppose “Options for Change” has conveniently slipped your mind, Mike.

    Or were our armed forces twice the size they are today when the current government came to power back in 1997?

    May I dare to suggest that the current size of our forces is due to much longer-term planning:

    http://www.bopcris.ac.uk/bop1991/browse/Annex2.html

    Could you also enlighten us perhaps on current Tory policy regarding defence spending should the charmless Michael Hecht (or should that be Howard) win the next election?

    Best regards

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Baltic Airforces #2696000
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Err it’s already happened…hang-on to NATO’s coat tails!

    To be fair to them, all three have participated in recent NATO/PFP exercises.

    I also seem to remember NATO have financed an AEW radar system that’s gone up in one of the three states…I assume to ‘look into’ Russia. Not really an area of my interest but I’m sure there’s plenty around on the story.

    I also recall NATO being aware that equipping any of these states with modern offensive weapons, or stationing other nation’s forces there, is sensitive due to the location of the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad….

    Best regards

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    I couldn’t agree with you more, Phil.

    It’s not long to wait until the White Paper gets published, and the details for Tranche 2 of Eurofighter should also see the light of day in the next month or so.

    Anyway, to emphasise the point about misinformation…this relates to the Sunday Telgraph piece posted here not so long ago:

    Scottish regiments will live to fight another day

    A RIPPLE of anger ran across Scotland on 23 November following an article in the Sunday Telegraph warning of dramatic cuts in the army – cuts that would include the disbandment of some of Scotland’s most famous regiments, such as the Royal Scots and the Black Watch. However, the message being passed around the Palace of Westminster to some very angry Scottish MPs was: “Calm down … it’s not going to happen.”

    The Sunday Telegraph has got it wrong, and in the Defence White Paper that will be published in the middle of this month there will be big changes, but the Scottish regiments will survive. All three services will be affected as the Defence Secretary, Geoff Hoon, charts the way ahead for the armed forces during the next five years. As ever, the problem for the Ministry of Defence is money, and all of the government departments are under pressure from the Chancellor to trim their budgets.

    The three armed services are almost certainly going to see major changes as the UK goes through the final stages of a decade long change in emphasis, from conventional military operations on what used to be described as the “European Central Front” to a more balanced, “ready for anything” posture, designed to deal with a variety of tasks from peace support missions to limited conventional operations.

    The Royal Air Force is the service that is likely to be the most affected. The RAF is due to receive 232 Eurofighter Typhoon aircraft over the next ten years. The total cost of the programme has been budgeted at £19.7 billion, and on a very rough calculation each aircraft is likely to cost around £70 million. It is likely that the third tranche of 88 aircraft, due to be delivered between 2010 and 2014, will be cancelled.

    There are longer-term plans for the Royal Navy that include the procurement of two new 60,000-ton aircraft-carriers – large vessels almost 300 metres in length and capable of carrying over 40 aircraft. The costings for this project are unclear, but it is likely that when all of the bills for the vessels, aircraft and crew are in, each carrier is going to cost between £3 billion to £4 billion. Most analysts believe that the current carrier project is going to be difficult to fit into the MoD’s long-term costing and that something is going to give. Recent defence market gossip suggests some sort of deal with the French is being considered.

    There are almost certainly going to be some pretty drastic changes in the way the army is organised, especially the infantry, but it is likely that all of the current regimental titles will survive. In the past an infantry battalion of some 600-700 men was the deployment option of choice. Each infantry battalion was made up of five companies: a headquarters company, three rifle companies and a manoeuvre support company (equipped with support weapons such as mortars and anti-tank systems). There are 40 infantry battalions with a total of 200 companies.

    Today’s infantry deployment option is the company group or combat team, based on a rifle company, and we believe that the new plan is to reduce the number of headquarters and manoeuvre support companies but to retain something near to a 200-company structure with more but slightly smaller rifle companies. This would mean doing away with possibly ten headquarters and manoeuvre support companies. Individual companies would retain their old regimental affiliation. The regiments most likely to lose a headquarters company and a manoeuvre support company are the so-called “large regiments” with two battalions, such as the Royal Anglians and The Light Infantry.

    Contrary to perceived opinion, the MoD is not doing too badly on the recruiting front, especially in a time of low unemployment. As of October this year, both the Royal Navy and the Royal Air Force were just over 1,000 personnel away from their trained strength requirement. However, there are real problems in the army – especially in the infantry, where the largest percentage of the army’s 3,900 trained strength deficit is to be found. Expect to see the forthcoming Defence White Paper recognising the difficulty of “squaring” the personnel problem inside the current arrangements and adopting solutions that could be described as enhancing power projection capabilities.

    Above all, this White Paper will be about reducing longer-term costs and co-operating with allies, especially European allies. It is no longer possible for a “small country situated off the coast of Western Europe” to continue to try to do it all alone.

    Charles Heyman

    • Charles Heyman is the senior defence analyst for Jane’s Consultancy Group.

    Cheers!

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Su 27 in the USA? #2696173
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Originally posted by EWR303
    I did a search on the internet and came up with a few reports of Su 27s at Groom Lake. There were a few photos, but nothing clear. Oh well.

    I’d love to see ANY clear photos from Groom Lake you’ve found, EWR303 :p

    From reading the report on the web made by the guy who was up at Tikaboo this April it would seem he knew what he was talking about and, although the photos aren’t at all clear, he seems pretty certain as to what he was watching.

    Here’s one of the ex-Moldavian MiG-29s…inside the Threat building at Nellis so pretty much impossible for civvies to see nowadays!

    http://area51specialprojects.com/images/DSC00107.JPG

    Best regards

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Su 27 in the USA? #2696292
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Hi Chaps

    I thought we’d done this one before?!

    Arthur’s right, they came via Belarus AF and were seen on board the An-124 when it fuel-stopped at Prestwick in Scotland (beware of spotters who work as marshallers/handlers/ramp agents 😀 )

    If you look around on the web you’ll find low-quality photos and even video IIRC of one taken flying out of Groom Lake. Do Google search using “Tikaboo Peak” and Su-27 etc. as I’m off out the door to meet people from the airport right now!

    Try links from “Dreamland Resort.com” etc.

    Ciao!

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: General Discussion #390495
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Much cheaper than Mavericks 😀

    in reply to: Post your funny aviation pics here #1971814
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Much cheaper than Mavericks 😀

    in reply to: General Discussion #429595
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Re: well…

    Originally posted by Vortex
    took hits into her legs, continue fighting until she ran out of ammo and took a knife wound by the enemy

    I don’t have an opinion one way or the other on this episode but none of the reports of how she received her injuries are true, as has been confirmed in a statement made at Landstuhl today.

    I do notice there was almost no coverage whatsoever of the two MoD-contracted Kenyan drivers that were released from captivity by British forces near Basra.

    Best regards

    Steve ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: Jessica Lynch #1994241
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    Re: well…

    Originally posted by Vortex
    took hits into her legs, continue fighting until she ran out of ammo and took a knife wound by the enemy

    I don’t have an opinion one way or the other on this episode but none of the reports of how she received her injuries are true, as has been confirmed in a statement made at Landstuhl today.

    I do notice there was almost no coverage whatsoever of the two MoD-contracted Kenyan drivers that were released from captivity by British forces near Basra.

    Best regards

    Steve ~ Touchdown-News

    in reply to: General Discussion #371511
    Steve Touchdown
    Participant

    You’re spot-on, Ink.

    Cases in point, both involving “friendly fire” incidents:

    the AAC Gazelle that was shot down by a Royal Navy ship at anchor during the Falklands War. Has that actually ever been admitted to? The inquest and the initial report had it “flying into high terrain”. What they left out was that the impact with the terrain was assisted by a ship’s defence projectile up its jacksie (I’m sure Steve can enlighten us as to what it was hit by).

    It took until 1997 for the US Army to admit that an ACR soldier took a HEAT round in the sternum during a blue-on-blue in the ’91 Gulf War. I wonder what we’ll be reading about for the first time in 2009 from this campaign and what’s still undiscovered from round one?

    Lastly, and try to get ANYBODY to admit to this little gem:

    during Operation Provide Comfort after the ’91 Gulf War, not only were the USAF involved in dropping relief supplies and tents to the Kurds in northern Iraq, they also helpfully refuelled Turkish AF Phantoms (confirmed) and F-16s (assumed) that were dropping bombs on the very same people. Nice piece of tactics don’t you think? Concentrate your targets by dropping them something they need to keep them from freezing to death then drop cluster bombs on them.

    Why on Earth would any of you believe that things have changed since then? I can certainly see straight through all of the rhetoric and bullsh1t.

    If any of the British on this forum think we have more in common with the USA than we do with our European neighbours after witnessing Bush’s address to CENTCOM at MacDill AFB just now I would be astounded. If I had to describe it I think the phrase “xenophobic christian fervour” would be pretty accurate to anybody hailing from outside of “God’s chosen country”.

    Somebody please pass me a bucket, I think I’m going to chuck…

    Peace, y’all (or does that make me a pussy these days?)

    Steve

Viewing 15 posts - 766 through 780 (of 812 total)