dark light

AdlerTag

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 571 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Nice SE-5A rep flying #1136142
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    Agreed! Amazing to think of the effort the builder must have gone to, both in terms of sourcing original parts and scratch building some seriously complex items like the radiator. I hope it gets the attention at Oshkosh that the builder deserves. 🙂

    in reply to: Spotted #1139013
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    Unless I have lost my mind, a high winged monplane, with what appeared to be floats, just flew over the outskirts of Derby.

    Presumably the very same aircraft just seen over Ruddington, Notts! Strange reading your post and looking out of the window in the same moment to see it myself. Looked like a Cessna 182, in which case I’m guessing it will be G-ESSL as that’s the only amphibious 182 in the country at the moment as far as I’m aware.

    http://www.airplane-pictures.net/image14666.html

    in reply to: Engine fire or shadow? #1139391
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    Thanks Moggy, that would make the tail letter an ‘E’.

    in reply to: Engine fire or shadow? #1139426
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    The markings on the tail suggest it’s an aircraft from the 313th Bomb Wing, all 313th aircraft having a large circle painted on the fin. A different letter was used for each Bomb Group, and it’s hard to read in this photo but it looks like an ‘R’, which would make it an aircraft from the 6th BG of the 313th BW. The marking on the fuselage side is most likely a 7 as numbers rather than letters were used to identify individual aircraft.

    in reply to: Engine fire or shadow? #1139445
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    I’d say it’s a combination of shadow and oil, the engine appears to have chucked alot of oil over the nacelle around and immediately behind the cowling. At around this point, the oil stains merge with the shadow of the nose of the camera aircraft, and the shadow of the camera aircraft’s fuselage extends back over the tailplane. I think what’s fooling us here is how the darkness of the oil on the cowlings and nacelle corresponds so closely in shade to the pure shadow further aft.

    By the way, the aircraft in the picture is a Renton-built B29A, distinguished by the four-gun top turret which was only fitted to Renton examples.

    in reply to: RAF and Luftwaffe bombing question #1140121
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    The He111 was the only Luftwaffe bomber involved in the Blitz that had the bomb load mounted vertically as described, the other types having conventionally mounted bomb loads.

    in reply to: Excuse my ignorance #1140158
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    Actually, the wariness vs France is quite understandable, considering the rising of numerous Fascist groups in France in the 1920s & 30s.

    Google:
    Action Francaise
    Jeunesses Patriotes
    Faisceau
    Cagoulards
    Croix de Feu
    Parti Populare Francais

    Add in the fact that the Cartel des gauches {French for Left-wing Coalition} (the governmental alliance between the Radical-Socialist Party and the socialist French Section of the Workers’ International (SFIO)) twice won general elections (in 1924 and in 1932) placing France under the control of a potentially hostile, borderline communist government.

    Thus, the constitutional monarchy of the UK saw France as a definite possible opponent, if either extremist faction became firmly in control of the country.

    I think Bager’s post can best be summed up as “What happens when someone with a decent brain says the things that you were trying to say”! Thanks Bager, you sum it up rather better than I did!

    in reply to: RAF Beech 'Staggerwing' survivors #1140492
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    Thanks Avion,

    Yep, that’s the DoBAF example, the question still stands though as to whether this is the Prince Barnard aircraft…

    Meanwhile, the evidence over on WIX appears to point toward the 1941HAG’s example as having served in a three-tone US Navy camouflage scheme! News to me…

    in reply to: European Yak -3/9's #1140630
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    There was a thread along the same lines a few months back, and it contains a pretty comprehensive listing. 🙂

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=95276&highlight=stacks+yaks

    in reply to: Excuse my ignorance #1140705
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    I’m by no means a member of the ‘Roundal Police’, but I thought as there hasn’t been much comment on this I’d chip in. IIRC the colours were swapped in the late 1920’s, there are pics of various 20’s types such as the Flycatcher and Gamecock with blue-white-red, but go forward into the 30’s with types such as the Hart and it swaps round to Red-White-Blue.

    It’s one of the little-spoken of facts that at around this time the British military began to be wary of the French, and war with France seemed most likely to be the next major european conflict. This continued to be the case until Hitler became a serious threat in the late 30’s. I think the swap of fin flash colours was to ensure that they didn’t look like the French ones, and later in the 30’s fin flashes were done away with entirely for a while.

    This ‘war with France’ thing was also the reason why RDF (Radar) stations were placed along the south coast, aswell as up the east coast, which is why Fighter Command ended up with RDF stations that were so handily placed in the summer of 1940…

    That’s my tuppence worth!

    in reply to: RAF Beech 'Staggerwing' survivors #1141887
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    I take it the FAA had a comms flight at Heston?

    I’m no expert on Heston, so I can’t say. It would make sense though considering how many Fairey designs were in FAA service, it would have been useful to have a comms squadron so close to such a major manufacturer.

    in reply to: RAF Beech 'Staggerwing' survivors #1142306
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    They seemed to have been based at early Heathrow (Heston?), not sure where else?

    Slight correction there Pagen old chap, the old aerodrome that was expanded to become Heathrow was the old Great West Aerodrome. Easily confused as Fairey had production facilities at both sites, and the two sites were practically next-door to eachother! Heston is now largely built over, with a chunk of fly-over running across it to boot.

    in reply to: ID the Russian Jet Please. #1142310
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    Looks like a MiG-15, or more likely given the location, a Czech built S-102 or S-103. The S-102 was equivalent to the MiG-15, and the -103 was the copy of the MiG-15bis. Legend has it that the Czech-built examples were of a better quality than the Russian ones.

    in reply to: TE311 Update #1145645
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    They made a few, technically a Mk.XVI is a Mk.IX with a Packard engine anyway so a change to RR would technically convert it to a Mk.IX. That’s my understanding anyway!

    in reply to: The Candy Bomber has left us #1145652
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    Blue skies Harry Bachus, you seem to have had quite a life.

    Mods: The man most widely known as the Candy Bomber is Col. Gail Halverson, who is still alive today. It might be an idea to change the thread title to avoid confusion.

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 571 total)