It depends what you’re looking for, as others have said. Probably the best all-rounder for realism and fun factor would be the Il2 Sturmovik series, it’s realistic enough to be challenging and you can do all sorts of things with it. Air combat, carrier take-offs and landings, strafing, bombing etc etc. There’s also a HUGE range of aircraft to fly, although ofcourse they’re all WWII types, and a huge array of ground objects and maps/scenery. There’s also an extensive list of realism settings, so you can set the difficulty level yourself (although there’s also a default ‘Easy/Medium/Difficult’ button if you don’t want to trawl through all the settings).
Microsoft Flight Sim is great, but it’s a bit ‘heavy’ on technical detail and you have alot to do before you can fly, eg engine start sequnces, fuel load etc, which you might find off-putting. With Il2 you load the game and fly, it’s dead easy.
The first Allison powered MiG-3 is now at Virginia Beach as part of Jerry Yaegen’s collection, although I think it’s yet to fly in the States. The AM-35 powered example in Flanker Man’s pic above flew recently, and the example in the news item appears to be a third example, Allison powered, that was reported to be nearly complete in Aircraft magazine recently.
Hi Tom,
You might be interested to know that Haynes have just published a manual on the 109, along the same lines as the Spit, Lanc and Tiger Moth manuals they’ve done in the past. Should have plenty of the kind of detail you’re after.
But it is preceded by ‘An’ rather than ‘A’…….
So it reads ‘An Ess-you’ rather than ‘A Soo’.
You can’t say ‘An Soo’ – at least not where I come from.
Anyway, its all a bit pedantic…….
Merry Christmas
Ken
Ah, very true Ken! Apologies. I must admit I have a habit of saying ‘Ess-You’, even if it is written correctly! You’ve found me out… 🙂
A Merry Christmas to you too!
Many moons ago there was a chap on the forum by the name of ‘keithmac’, ex-RAF groundcrew. Amongst his many postings were a couple to Javelin squadrons in different parts of the world. You could try a PM in case he still browses, or maybe someone here is still in touch with him?
Hmmm I’d have thought ‘SU’ would have looked more like ‘Ess-You’. It’s typed as ‘Su’ in the title and first post…
At the risk of going off-topic, does anyone remember that the MiG-29 that first appeared at Farnborough in 1988 was placarded in English? Anyone know why, apart from a Russian sense of humour? There was a theory going the rounds that the placarding was bog-standard Nato stuff, and had the Cold War had suddenly got hot the Russians could have rolled up at any Nato base and “persuaded” the local ground crews to do the necessaries. Or was that just paranoid gossip?
I’ve got a negative somewhere I’ll get scanned in.
This may have been a MiG-29S (Fulcrum-C) or an export -29SE, the English language cockpit being more marketable.
As I understand it, the ex-AFC machine is still with Flying Heritage. There’s a flying example based at the Tillamook Air Museum, powered by an American engine (P&W or Wright, can’t remember which). The museum website classes the aircraft as a restored original, although it’s largely new build.
http://www.tillamookair.com/html/oscar.html
Looking at the above link, it seems the cockpit hood and windshield have been raised to make room for the taller 21st century western pilot.
I have to echo what’s already been said about good weather, the return of the TFC fleet, and the Red Bull collection- P38, B25, and F4U. It’s a great shame that they’ve never displayed in the UK, Legends or elsewhere.
Stretching things a bit further, it would be great to see the three Bf109G’s, the two Duxford Buchons, and three Fw190’s (the third ‘190 being Jerry Yeagan’s example that’s currently being worked on at Bremgarten). Maybe FlugWerke could re-activate the two they’ve got stored somewhere (D-FWWC & D-FWJS), five 190’s would be something! We can but dream…
Alot of modern boom mikes have very good noise suppression, but back say ten plus years ago when Mark was flying it was often necessary in most warbirds and classic jets to wear a mask to protect the mike from all the noise.
This would be a wonderful thing to see at OW, just a shame the Avro Rota isn’t there anymore to go alongside it!
Roughly how much sponsorship is still required??
Aren’t those Mk.I’s?? I always thought the II had the turretless nose and the B&P upper turrets.
This replica looks very much like the work of the Pur Sang Historic Aero group. They already have thier own replica flying powered by a Kinner radial, which has been discussed on the forum before:
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=89369
EDIT: If you click on the link, there’s a further YouTube link on that page which shows the Fighter Factory replica under construction, so it’s definately the work of the same group.
As for 504N’s Roger, there’s one complete example at the Danish Aviation Museum at Stauning, and there’s a chap in the States who’s hoping to build one or two replica N’s powered by Rotec radials.
It’s a Camel replica, OK-NUL, painted up in 208sqn colours. I’m afraid I don’t know anything about the origins of it, although there is a Czech company that makes Fokker Dr.1 replicas so it might have something to do with the same outfit. Clearer pic on link below.
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Sopwith-Camel-%28replica%29/1398019/L/
The Hudson also had a couple of fixed Brownings in the nose. I’m guessing turretless examples were unarmed, so the removal of the nose guns and mounts etc would go some way to balancing things out?