Heretic hat on and wishing everyone involved with the Carlisle Group good luck β IF any gossip about Carlisle has any substance why just all the fuss about the Vulcan (merely to prove a point in a web-forum βdebateβ), what about the other exhibits and everyone involved? :rolleyes:
I’m thinking the Vulcan is foremost in people’s minds as it’s the biggest airframe in the Carlisle collection, and it would take an awful lot of money and effort to move it from the site. Bottom line is that it would be more likely to be largely or wholly scrapped than the other exhibits. Here’s hoping it doesn’t come to that.
Below is a link to the Channel 4 documentary “The Great Escape: The Reckoning” first broadcast in November last year.
Below is a link to the Channel 4 documentary “The Great Escape: The Reckoning” first broadcast in November last year.
Yes, ofcourse BBMF do a great job, but as I see things it’s a case of the more the merrier. It’s a special scheme to mark a special year, that’s the main point.
My goodness Tim, no I hadn’t seen that before. Many thanks for sharing such a gem with us- it seems you had a busy couple of days! It makes for an interesting and ofcourse sobering read- so many shot up, wounded and killed all on the one page, and hospitalised yourself ofcourse. I hope you haven’t had to buy a drink since!
Simply jettisoning the canopy would affect the airflow and possibly result in the recovery from the spin.
The hood on the Meteor T7 and the NF series was reputed to give sufficient lift as to keep the aircraft airborn at speeds in excess of 350 knots. This was to ensure that the hood lifted cleanly off the fuselage when jettisoned. (Being hopeful as always).
Certainly the hood was the first thing to stall and the back seater could plainly hear the airflow breaking away over his head, particularly in high G turns.
Along similar lines, I was also thinking that perhaps the firing of the ejector seat would have given the nose a downward shove, helping the recovery?
Yes, XD818 is the last survivor and she’s now at Cosford having been in the Hendon Bomber Command Hall for a few decades. There are a few other cockpit sections about. Good survivors listing on the link below.
http://www.thunder-and-lightnings.co.uk/valiant/survivors.php
Watched its filming & shuddered!!
= Tim
Hello Tim,
I’m wondering if you’d be kind enough to give us your impressions of the book and TV series, I think everyone here would value your opinion on them. I know there was a hell of a storm generated by veterans when the series was first broadcast, would you be among them?
Christ, what a lot of nay-saying! :rolleyes:
The two squadrons concerned, current in the modern-day RAF, have a fine Battle of Britain history (not to mention their wartime exploits), so why the hell not paint one of their fixed-wing aircraft to commemorate the fact?
(As it happens, there are NO current flying Spitfires representing either of those squadrons (I think the BBMF Mk.IIa has represented one of them – 72).)
Bring it on, I say.
Phew! I’m glad somebody agrees. π
I don’t quite understand the negative comment about this special scheme, surely any publicity for the Battle of Britain 70th Anniversary is good publicity?? Add to this the fact that the aircraft will come from a squadron with the BofB in its Battle Honours, and you have a double commemoration. It seems like a great idea to me, it’s an example of pride and prestige within the modern RAF, a service with a long and distinguished history that it deserves to be proud of. It’s often the case that when the RAF do an anniversary scheme, it’s often just a bit of extra insignia on the fin, and an extra flash of colour somewhere. Welcome though that is, it isn’t quite the same as the kind of schemes some of our European neighbours manage. Just look at the schemes that have appeared on Luftwaffe Phantoms and Tornado’s in recent years, for example. In short it’s great to see such lengths being taken to represent the RAF’s heritage and a slice of British history.
The two Hawk display aircraft have a cracking scheme for this season too, I look forward to seeing both types this coming season. π
I don’t have any figures for the types you mention, but just generally speaking take-offs from water tend to be much longer than on land due the surface tension and friction of the water. It takes longer for the aircraft to accelerate up to flying speed, and the take off speed is higher due to the aircraft needing extra lift to break free of the surface tension of the water.
Sounds the business Dave, thanks. I look forward to seeing how things progress, she’s a beaut already.
The Airacomet project at Chino is still ongoing, update from Feb 2009 on link below.
Looks great Dave, very well done mate. Do let us know how things progress! Out of interest, what type of engines will you be using?
Amazing selection, thanks for the link SF. Well worth a look!