dark light

AdlerTag

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 571 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Confederate air force #1054289
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    It’s my impression that the Confederate Air Force name change was less to do with being PC, and more to do with carrying the organisation forward. Fresh winds and young blood have come along since the re-branding, arguably as a result of getting away from the old boys’ club reputation of the old CAF. It has to be remembered that the old CAF was picking up a very bad reputation, with a very high average age of members and a worryingly high accident rate in some CAF wings. The ‘Cobra Den’ thread over on WIX gives a good impression of the differences between the old and the new standards. The supposedly airworthy P63 has needed some very deep work to make it properly airworthy, for instance the previous engine rebuild was a bit of a joke and all sorts of problems were found (missing piston rings, warped cylinder barrels etc). It’s amazing the thing flew safely in the past.

    The CAF has wings all over the US now and as the organisation grows it gets less and less appropriate to highlight the link with the Confederate states, in addition to the Confederate connection potentially putting off docents and volunteers etc from non-Confederate states. In summary, it’s now a more inclusive-looking organisation which can only be good for it’s image.

    Long live the new Commemorative Air Force.

    in reply to: OFMC secret talks #1055908
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    Just to clarify, the article I was thinking of goes back alot further to the mid 90’s.

    Whatever the type in question in 2011, it would be great to see the OFMC fleet growing again even if only by one airframe.

    in reply to: Ruhr Dams Question #1056455
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    There was also the successful attack on the Kembs dam on the Rhine in October 1944, to prevent its being used as a weapon against the approaching allied ground forces.

    That’s certainly another special raid worth mentioning. To be slightly pedantic, the Kembs ‘dam’ was actually a moveable barrier rather than a fixed dam, but it was still a significant structure.

    in reply to: OFMC secret talks #1056479
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    I remember that article, and I think at that time the La9 was in bits at Dux prior to being shipped to NZ for restoration and so wouldn’t have been much of a secret. I think the ‘secret type’ was a genuine (not Flug Werke) Fw190 they had under restoration in NZ at one point. If I remember rightly the 190 suffered badly at the hands of a bogus restoration company, I don’t know where it ended up.

    in reply to: Another Lightning Displayed At Coningsby #1065294
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    It’s called “To the Unknown Man”.

    Great little video, it just goes to show how much effort, money and expertise has been lavished on this aircraft to save it from the state of dereliction is was in at Rossington.

    in reply to: Ruhr Dams Question #1065312
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    The later attack was carried out by 9 Sqn on October 15th 1944, both 9 and 617 squadrons were equipped with Tallboy Lancs by that time.

    It’s worth mentioning that 617 had a crack with Tallboys at the Urft dam in December ’44, again without result despite 15 weapons being dropped and one direct hit being scored.

    A good book on 617’s wartime exploits is “Dambusters in Focus” by Postlethwaite and Shortland, I can’t recommend it highly enough.

    in reply to: UK TV Heads-up. You missed The War Lover last Saturday #1065351
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    Am I right in thinking some of the War Lover B17’s had codes and serials painted on backwards, or was that for 12 O’Clock High?

    in reply to: BoB Fabric Wing Hurricanes #1065369
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    Thanks for the information Foray, I’ve adjusted my initial post accordingly.

    in reply to: Ruhr Dams Question #1066122
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    As far as I’m aware, no further attacks were launched on the dams whilst they were under repair, although the Sorpe was later attacked with Tallboys without significant result.

    One Tallboy failed to detonate and had to be made safe by an RAF bomb disposal team in 1958.

    http://www.rafbdhistory.co.uk/new_page_5.htm

    in reply to: Short Sandringham #1066125
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    I don’t really want to drag the topic into the depths of pedantry, but I’m pretty sure she’s always been classed as a Sunderland. G-INFO has her listed as a “Sunderland Mk.5 (Modified)”, for instance. If I remember rightly, there were differences in the nose profile and cabin layout etc compared to the full-blown civilian Sandringham.

    in reply to: A380 having a cracking time #553565
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    Just to comment on PeeDee’s pic, I’ve been told that the wrinkles on B52 fuselages are intentional and allow for a certain amount of flex in the fuselage. Apparently the wrinkles are there from new and don’t just develop.

    in reply to: BoB Fabric Wing Hurricanes #1066644
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    Hard to tell from the low-res version I’ve linked to below, but in better copies of this photo the wings on US-P P2764 (Edit: serial now in doubt) appear to have the ribbed appearance of fabric covered wings. It was certainly behind on the usual mod state, being as it has a DH variable pitch prop (rather than the Rotal constant speed), the old un-armoured windscreen and no apparent radio mast.

    http://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/205190908

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2012 #1066780
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    is it still flying?

    Yes, that’s Sally B.

    I’d just like to add my thanks and appreciation for this thread, it’s always nice to be able to follow what’s going on at Dux, especially if like me you only get to visit once or twice a year.

    AdlerTag
    Participant

    I’m a little surprised by the shouts being made in favour of the He162. Yes, it was an amazing aircraft considering it was designed and flown so quickly, but it still had flaws regards design and production quality. The engine was slow to respond, especially from idle (which led to a number of serious undershoot accidents on landing), the electrics were dicey, and the rudders were too powerful (the cases of wing failure attributed to glue problems were actually more to do with the wings being overstressed by rudder inputs). The examples evaluated by the French after the war exhibited all these problems, and the engines would only deliver about 70% of the advertised power, which dictated the use of flaps for all take-offs despite the long runway.

    All in all it may have been a delight once it was airborne, but it was all too easy to get killed in.

    in reply to: Short Sandringham #1066815
    AdlerTag
    Participant

    I’ve no idea of the year I’m afraid but I think this is the Sunderland now with Kermit Weeks, rather than a Sandringham.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 571 total)