This article made me laugh, he talks of not allowing check-in baggage or charging for the priviledge, then goes on to say why do we need seats? 😮 What is this guy on?! 😉

SPIEGEL ONLINE: To lower your prices and your cost, you’ve started to make airplanes more spartan: no window blinds, no seat pockets, no reclinable seats. Where’s that going to lead?

O’Leary: Adapting seats is relatively small beer. The big change that could be coming is eliminating check-in baggage. If you do that, you can simplify the way airports are designed. You no longer have baggage haul, no handlers. No lost bags, no lost-bag departments.

http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,301722,00.html

Although there was talk of pay-per-view ptvs!

SPIEGEL ONLINE: So pay-per-use entertainment might become a source of income?

O’Leary: Yea. People with children can swipe their credit card and watch cartoons. It’s the only way to keep the children quiet. If the flight is full of men – pornography! I don’t care as long as customers want it and it lowers fares. Maybe flying will be free in 2015 and airports will pay us to carry their passengers. There’s no reason why we can’t change the whole economics of air travel – apart from the fact that the industry is run by a bunch of numb nuts.

FR get you to 1hr out of Barcelona! 😀 Yes, but at those prices, who can argue?

Those wings are way too elegant looking to put on a big fat bird like it! 😀

Only because Ryanair class a flight that they know is going to last 1.5hrs as being 2hrs long, so to be truely punctual they have to arrive 1/2 an hour early all the time! 😀 ok, EZY do that tactic a bit as well!

😮 Thanks for that Renfrew! 😮 It’s huge, especially the wings! The span and especially the surface area is just huge! 😮
It dwarfs everything! 😀

Im sorry i just don’t think its big, it looks quite small from that picture actually, but you know when i see it land in the future i might feel different.

I think the reason you think this is because it is getting dwarfed by that HUGE hanger! 🙂