My list would include…
trying to keep it down to a manageable few, so my criteria would be along the lines of public recognition…and airframes that are easily available.Vulcan
Comet
Canberra
Metor
Hunter
Harrier
Whirlwind or Wessex…in recognition of their rescue work.
A near perfect selection but I think a Lightning would need to be added to make it complete.
Sorry but I just had to post this…
And GW2. It just never saw actual combat.
I’m certain there was one single A2A victory credited to a Tornado F3 during Desert Storm.
Speaking of museums..
Does the F3 have any combat or deployment history to make it attractive to museums…(other than those that will take any airplane)?
Desert Storm?
Yes…all marks of Harrier had slab tailplanes (or stabilators – as some of our cousins call them 😀 )
I am so embarrassed I didn’t know that! 😮
Is that an all moving tail plane I can see on the Harrier? 😮
To be replaced by the first Saudi Typhoons, but I don’t know what will happen to them after they’re withdrawn.
I would have thought that there must be a couple of countries who would want low mileage one owner aircraft to bolster their Air Forces with.
Or are Tornado F3s so ’80s that no-one wants them?!!
here you go.
What’s this?
F3?
F3a?
F4a?
F5?
Turning them into bombers ? Why not. After all the airframe was originally designed that way. But it would require a major change in the underfuselage configuration to have it identical to the IDS version’s…
Plus, it would require the replacement of the current avionic by a dedicated one…
BTW: I wonder if it would be possible to replace the ADV’s engines by the Typhoon’s. For sure it would help to carry really heavy payloads…
Surely putting pylons under fuselage wouldn’t need that much work as I’m sure they’d run alongside the missile holes.
Thanks guys, you have answered all of my questions! 😀
I love the paint scheme on the Hawk but think the heart at the centre of the RAF roundel looks cr@p! 🙁
Yesterday while waiting at Popham services on the A303 at 1540 I saw 3 aircraft on Popham airfield. Firstly a yellow high wing monoplane taxiing along the far side of the runway back toward the hangers, then a white low wing monoplane lined up and took off heading east then a silver WW2 American fighter lined up and prepared for take off.
Unfortunately I wasn’t able to get any serial numbers, as Popham is only a small airfield can anybody provide any more details?
Just being pedantic here, but for the record,
The prototype P.1127, XP831, and thus prototype to the whole P.1127 / Kestrel / Harrier line, is displayed in the Science Museum in London.
Three of the six P.1127s survive, including XP980 at Yeovilton, and XP984 at Brooklands.The first Kestrel, XS688, is the one previously mentioned as being preserved at Dayton.
Unbelievably given the hazardous nature of the trials of pressing this new beast into service, the next five aircraft are preseved and displayed in the US, and one stuffed away in a storage hangar at Cosford. Thats seven out of the nine Kestrels built.There were no prototypes as such with the Harrier (P.1127RAF), just six Developement Batch aircraft, the first was lost, but the second, XV277, is preseved at East Fortune and is thus the oldest surviving Harrier. The next Five of the six aircraft are preserved.
The oldest Sea Harrier surviving is the second of three Developement Batch aircraft, XZ439, and is airworthy (N94422) in the States, which along with survivor XZ440 was unfortunatly converted into an FA.2.
The two GR.5 (British Harrier II) DB aircraft, ZD318-‘319 aircraft survive.
That has to be some kind of record, out of the twentysix prototype and DB aircraft, nineteen survive! Not bad for something so revolutionary.
A couple of years ago I visited Brooklands and there was an early Harrier on display there, does anybody know why that particular airframe was significant?
Thinking out loud, recently I have been thinking that maybe the TSR-2 was never really intended to enter service with the RAF but the whole project was intended to scare the Russians.
Spending a small percentage of the full design, development, testing and purchasing costs only designing and developing 2 top level attack aircraft to show the Russians what we are capable of if they decided to warm up the cold war. Does anybody know what the Russian opinions of this aircraft were when they found out about it?
Sorry if these question have already been answered! :p
Thanx Anna and Mike….it is well worth a visit….possibly a good venue for a forum meet…I only live around the corner so you are always welcome a cup of tea!
Me too (how are you Rocketeer?).
Unfortunately I don’t think my wife would be too keen on having any more aviation lovers in our house so I can’t offer the same hand of friendship!