sorry wrong thread
sorry wrong thread
But RRJ60B and MS-21-200 are different class …..
But RRJ60B and MS-21-200 are different class …..
> i can’t believe that USAF would not want to retain a/c of
> that capability without replacing it with something that
> has similar performance in terms of speed.
Yes it is a puzzle to me too. If a conflict breaks out in some remote place, it can take as much as three to four days to change an orbit enough to get coverage of where you want.
thst sud not be puzzling, coz what they did was a honourable withdrawal of the SR-71, rather than shattering the to be written ‘records’ in history as the unchallenged a/c.
It was always better not to shatter that one falling to the MiG-25, and MiG-31s and thats what I belive made US to retire it.
Originally Posted by edisonone
Comments:And, the Imperial Japanese Army’s incursion into the whole of Asia
and its sneak attack at Pearl? Shouldn’t Japan apoligize for that as well???
first of all i hope its ur own comment, Or was it what the continental teachers brainwashed comments for the puppies …like they did for the Evil Soviets after the War.
So getting back to the Japanese stuff, Mr Edisonone.
The Japanese Empire with Imperial Japanese Army, Navy or Airforce NEVER COLONISED OR INVADED ANY SOVERGIN ASIAN NATION!!!
What they invaded and attacked was the British, American and other European COLONIES, which threatened the Japanese Industrial needs from their natural markets.
It happened when the European (inclusing the British started to come in the way of Japanes presence to their Natural area, and not the other way round.
Oh and coming to ur Japanes apology for Pearl Harbor. well have the Americans apologised for all the japanese ships and a/c lost after the Pearl harbor Incident, The japanese Carrier, their powerful cruisers???…. well no buddy….. u need to wake up dear ……. all this leaving alone what during the closing period of the war.
How many Damn dogs appologised for the Massacare at Hiroshima and another Massacare at Nagasaki???….. can u count the number of Dogs and puppies????
If not come back after counting, I’d be glad to have a chat with u.
No present hardware, just a look into the future. 😉
and what were u talking abt, Huh??? …. again smart arsed one :dev2:
The talk was abt the Ks-172 and R-37 which cud take out the AWACS and u were arguing its not possible ….. and for ur INFO as u don seem to know —– R-37 and Ks-172 ARE FUTURE MISSILES. PLease copy and paste it in front of where ever u sit.
Seems like High on Vodaka, after all Russian stuffs are cheap isn’t it.
nah… I think I’ll stick with the avatar for now
Its not the planes I have a problem with,… its airbus itself and they way they conduct business. I have been made privvy to documents that would make every ones hair stand on end in this forum
k as u say, but if u like to put that in the forum u can always do that in here.
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=34545
But will i be able to get that document??….. I’d want to read it, if not in post, can i get it in PM?
nah… I think I’ll stick with the avatar for now
Its not the planes I have a problem with,… its airbus itself and they way they conduct business. I have been made privvy to documents that would make every ones hair stand on end in this forum
k as u say, but if u like to put that in the forum u can always do that in here.
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=34545
But will i be able to get that document??….. I’d want to read it, if not in post, can i get it in PM?
So ……….. what that means is an article either dedicated to IAF or Su-30MKI or Flankers are on the horizon in AFm or Janes ?
and the Regional Jet thats flying and also have got 50 or so orders to its book and to enter service this December.
Tu-334
and the Regional Jet thats flying and also have got 50 or so orders to its book and to enter service this December.
Tu-334
Originally Posted by Bmused55
the 7E7 and A380 are in two completely different markets. Qanta buying the 7E7 would not effect the A380… even though so far Qantas as not ordered either!
I have no idea what your trying to say about the CDG airport terminal. All I know is that is was built fast and it would seem the quality of construction may have lacked somewhat.
And what is this about a Single aircrash for Airbus?? may I remind you that there have been several crashes involving airbus, including several for the A320.
Tks for the info abt the two different class …. the crash I meant was in India….. mean of all the Indian operators.
Hey……. I also see u’ve changed ur Signature 😉 …… hope u also change ur Avatar. TY, I think ur a good chap, so u not that too…. 🙂
Originally Posted by Bmused55
the 7E7 and A380 are in two completely different markets. Qanta buying the 7E7 would not effect the A380… even though so far Qantas as not ordered either!
I have no idea what your trying to say about the CDG airport terminal. All I know is that is was built fast and it would seem the quality of construction may have lacked somewhat.
And what is this about a Single aircrash for Airbus?? may I remind you that there have been several crashes involving airbus, including several for the A320.
Tks for the info abt the two different class …. the crash I meant was in India….. mean of all the Indian operators.
Hey……. I also see u’ve changed ur Signature 😉 …… hope u also change ur Avatar. TY, I think ur a good chap, so u not that too…. 🙂
What about the long range Maritime Patrol Aircraft?
This is an operational gap and we are conscious about it. We are working at it. We are upgrading our IL-38s. We are buying some more of those. We are looking at upgrades of TU-142 aircraft which have a much longer range. We have not yet found a satisfactory aircraft which meets our requirements. As you are aware the American are phasing out their P3C Orions and are keen that we buy them. I am personally not in favour of them.
I hope the Russians sent a proposal for a patrol a/c based on the Tu-204 which they initially had intended. I’d personally like to see that happen rather than goinin for something based on Boeing or Airbus.
thread for IL-38 & P-3 successors
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=33393
——–
here is the Yakolev’s Tiltrotor one, but the tilt-rotors mean more maint …