In documents of contractors everywhere appears Su-50
Quadro, did you see it?
Question also for Otaku.
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuadroFX
First flight – february, first photos – february.Didn’t they say first flight in January. Right around now?
We are always one month behind the first flight… like in October-09 :confused::mad:
From http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Sov-FOBS-Program.html
The missile’s flight profile comprised four phases – boost phase, orbital phase, braking phase and finally, the re-entry phase. The weapon’s 1,700 kg orbital stage was designated the 8F021 OGCh, which comprised a fuselage, an instrument section with an inertial guidance system, the de-orbit engine section, and an 8F673 ~5 Megatonne nuclear warhead section.
The 8F021 would, as it neared the de-orbit manoeuvre entry point, start the AT/UDMH liquid fuelled de-orbit engine turbopump using a solid propellant gas generator. Exhaust gasses from the turbine were used for vehicle attitude control, using a 4 + 4 thruster arrangement. This de-orbit engine design later formed the basis of the Tsiklon 3 ELV S5.23/RD-861 third stage orbital engine, rated at 78.710 kN / 17,695 lbf. The cited CEP for the RV was 1.1 km.
So, the FOBS is a “sort of a MARV warhead”. Developed during the 60s, so no a big deal today to develop a smaller MARV. The diference is the carrier (SS-9 vs SS-27) and the trajectory profile (orbital vs ballistic).
So, the future liquid fuel ICBM may have 10 550 kT warheads.
I think there is a complete modernisation of Akula,Oscar-2 on the cards , although I am not aware of the details of the modernisation , but they should be fighting fit for ~ 12 years post modernisation .
I would hazard a guess and think the Akula-2/Oscar-2 modernisation will mean for Akula-2 complete digital system from analog older Akula ( the Gepard SSN was all digital SSN and Nerpa ofcourse ) , new sensor/sonar suite , new weapons system and new reactor core that will last for atleast 15 years , for Oscar-2 it would be the same as Akula-2 plus the new and speculative Bolid missile and/or Yakhont
It would be a wise move 😎
QUOTE
On December 23, Russia marked the Strategic Aviation Day, which was established to commemorate the creation of the world’s first squadron of heavy bombers in 1914. Since then strategic aviation has become an element of the strategic nuclear triad ensuring Russia’s security.
Currently, only three countries have strategic aviation – Russia, the United States and China. In fact, only Russia and the U.S. have it, because China only has license-made Russian Tu-16s, whose range and armaments do not meet modern requirements.
The bulk of Russian and U.S. strategic bombers were made during the Cold War.
The United States has 90 B-52H bombers, a modification of the B-52 plane designed in the 1950s. Made in the early 1960s, they are armed with cruise missiles and bombs. The Stratofortresses are expected to remain on combat duty until the 2040s and possibly longer.
The U.S. Air Force also has 20 B-2 Spirit (Stealth) bombers made in the 1990s, and 66 B-1B Lancer supersonic bombers used as conventional weapons carriers.
Russia’s main strategic bomber is a Cold War veteran, the Tu-95MS Bear, a 1980s modification of the Tu-95 plane made in the 1950s. The Russian Air Force has 64 Tu-95MS Bears armed with long-range cruise missiles.
Russia’s latest strategic bomber is the supersonic Tu-160 Blackjack. It has 14 such planes and plans to resume their mass production, which was suspended in the 1990s.
In addition, Russia has over 150 long-range Tu-22M3 Backfire bombers in its Air Force and Navy. They have a shorter range than the Tu-95 and the Tu-160 and are designed primarily for bombing targets in Eurasia and North Africa and the surrounding seas.
Shortly before the Strategic Aviation Day, Air Force Commander Gen. Anatoly Zhikharev reported on the progress in the creation of a new strategic bomber by the Tupolev design bureau.
The possibility of creating a new prospective strategic bomber was first reported in 2008. In August 2009, the Russian government said it signed a relevant contract with the Tupolev bureau, which has designed the bulk of the country’s strategic aircraft since the 1930s.
Eventually, the new strategic bomber will replace the Tu-22M3 and Tu-95 aircraft, which are becoming obsolete, and will complement (and subsequently replace) the Tu-160.
The specifications of the prospective plane are kept secret, but sources say it will be a crossover between the Tu-22M3 and the heavier and more expensive Tu-160.
Since it will be cheaper than the Tu-160, the Russian Air Force will be able to buy a sufficient number of the new planes to decommission the Tu-95MS and the Tu-22M3. In all 200 aircraft will be replaced, including those made for the Navy.
It is so far unclear when the new plane will be ready. It was said in the summer of 2009 that it should make its maiden flight in 2015 or 2016, but sources say the deadline could be shifted to 2012-2013. Mass production is expected to start in 2019 or 2020.
The new supersonic bomber will have stealth elements, carry cruise missiles, and have a sufficient range to reach targets in Eurasia, North Africa and possibly (with midair refueling) on other continents and in the outlying regions of the World’s Oceans.
The new plane will have a variety of weapons, in particular multirole cruise missiles and guided bombs, ensuring its use for different purposes, from pinpoint strikes in local conflict zones to nuclear strikes.
Strategic aviation is one of the most flexible elements of the military system. Unlike nuclear missile submarines and intercontinental ballistic missiles, strategic bombers can carry conventional weapons for use in local conflicts and fulfill a wide range of tasks in an all-out war.
Such flexibility of the multirole strategic bombers ensures them a prominent place in Russia’s defenses even though they cannot fly as fast or carry as large an equivalent yield as intercontinental ballistic missiles.
The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s and do not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.
MOSCOW. (RIA Novosti military commentator Ilya Kramnik)
Forum name: Russia to commission new stealth bomber :confused:
I’ve only read stuff like two Batch.. so it could mean one Air regiment, or two
So, 12 or 24 Su-24M2. Disappointing numbers. 🙁
“I aim for the stars…but usually hit Zionists” by Mohammad Von Braun?
Well, “Mohammad” is written in Arab. The name should be translated to Farsi = Modern Persian, that’s “Mahmud”. :rolleyes:
I.e. Kamchatka island :D:cool:
I agree that the move to solid-propellant was a big leap forward. Remarkable is the Iranian achievement made in spite of economical sanctions. Anyway I doubt it can have MARV, at least as Topol-M or as Agni.
I would be interesting also a change on the TEL. A Topol like TEL is not beyond the Iranian possibilities and would greatly improve mobility and also survability. Later add a S-300 baterry in the deployment zone and the whole picture will be a nightmare for American and/or Israeli planes trying to hunt launchers.
– main caliber 8 triple= 24 P-800 ‘Onyx’
– guiding submarine+satelite based MKRTs ‘Legenda’ + self guiding
A sort of “mini” Oscar-II. It seems the Granit “brain” was migrated to Onyx.
Now that NAPO have completed to Su-24M2 state contract, i think next year we will see more than the current Su-34’s output a year.
How many Su-24M2 were delivered?
The Sejjil-2 would be the most formidable MRBM is the Iranian arsenal. Add a few nukes to it and Tel Aviv, Haifa and Jerusalem would become nuked-out wastelands at Ahmadinejad’s whim.
Cheap and dirty sio-propaganda. Iranians are not fool. Ahmadinejad can talk everything he wants, but Kamenei is tha man ruling Persia and he is far from an idiot.