dark light

Rodolfo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 976 through 990 (of 1,190 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: ABM or ASAT #1788399
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    I imagine China is still hyperventilating.

    No more than the Americans did 2 years ago. I still remember their screams. So, let’s try to avoid childish comments.

    in reply to: ABM or ASAT #1788493
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    How about the Istrebitel Sputnik? Is still operative?
    As far I know it was the lone thing that demonstrated a real ASAT capability before the Chinese test.
    The dedicated F-15 just launched a missile that supposedly intercepted “a point in the space” and the MiG-31D performed just the ascension tests.

    in reply to: Russian bombers 'intercepted by US' #2500835
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    The Russians learn fast the western art of hypocrisy

    This is normal combat training, General Deinekin said. Actually, it was joint training. “We, Russia and the U.S., are not opponents. We are partners in the fight against terrorism. There are no serious threats posed by our planes appearing over American ships in neutral waters. Their mission was not just to fly over, but to take a picture of the vessel to make sure that it was not a dry cargo or container ship, but the Nimitz – the pride and a beauty of the American naval forces.”

    :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Russian bombers 'intercepted by US' #2501198
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Tu-95 doesn’t target US carriers. I would have been more fun whith a pair of Tu-22M3:D

    in reply to: Japan says it was Tu-95 bomber that violated its air space #2502277
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    They should’ve shot it down.

    They are no so stupid to spit the Bear. Those who did it ended like … Adolph :p

    in reply to: Ability of RuAF and Russian Navy to destroy US CBG #2502338
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    I mean 1982 conclict.

    in reply to: Ability of RuAF and Russian Navy to destroy US CBG #2502340
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    The Argentinean Air force consistently found and atacked the British Task Forces during most of the 192 conflict. Nedless to say Russia has much more Recon assests than Argentina and that Tu-22 are much more capable than A-4.

    in reply to: An interesting report on where SM-3 is going. #1789034
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Hm. Not sure if a stealthy cruise missile wouldn’t be the better idea than a castrated/IRBM’d ICBM. I mean, why fight a BMD system with a BM?

    It will not be IRBMd. It will be a “short legs” ICBM (i.e. 6.500 km) to fullfil the INF “in paper” but to void it in reality 🙂 .
    I don’t knonw what’s better. If a GLCM or a shortened ICBM. Who knows?

    Sorry for the off-topic

    in reply to: An interesting report on where SM-3 is going. #1789072
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Interesting! It follows almost perfectly the pattern predicted by Gen. Baluyevsky respect to development and deployments of Amercian ABM systems. So it is almost sure to see 2-stage Topol-m (i.e. Pioneer-M) targeting Europe and the far East in the next decade.

    in reply to: IRBIS and the detection of low RCS targets #2523678
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    It may be possible withy an extremely powerfull emiter. IRBIS seems to follow that path. I am not sure on the data but, by increasing four-fold the raw power radiated (as IRBIS is claimed to do) surelly you can “see” smaller RCS objects.

    in reply to: the PAK-FA saga, continued2…… #2527971
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    that’s okay. Back in the day the ATF was going to be a Mach 4 aircraft that would have R2-D2 (“Pilot’s Associate”) in the back seat, directed energy weaponry, invisibility, and be built by robots in automated factories.

    That’s in the F-35 rigth now!! 😀 And off course Tom Cruise will ride it like in Top Gun:dev2: Lots of bru-ha-ha was granted to the world. Late… the pale reality.:confused:

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-2 #1789818
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    Mr Bush will not be happy on this

    http://en.rian.ru/world/20071226/94238985.html

    in reply to: S-400 vs THAAD vs SM-3 #1790719
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    THAAD terminal phase? Yes, but an exo-atmospheric one. PAC-3, and the current S-400 are true terminal-phase defenses.
    Supposedly the 40N6 BIG (so far on an endless testing phase) is able to reach 180 km ceiling.

    The Aegis/Spy-1/SM-??? is an impressive combo.

    in reply to: S-400 vs THAAD vs SM-3 #1790723
    Rodolfo
    Participant

    S-400 must yet reach its full configuration and now it is just the last iteration on the S-300PM series. SM-3 seems to be the most capable system. BTW, it would be an interesting idea to adapt SM-3 to land in order to obtain an “American S-400”. This would have allowed to avoid splitting resources in many different projects (PAC-3, THAAD, partial funding to Arrow and MEADS). From an economical point of view seems wiser to concentrate resources to boost the performance of an unified system and SM-3 seems to be the best of such systems.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-2 #1790959
    Rodolfo
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 976 through 990 (of 1,190 total)