I imagine China is still hyperventilating.
No more than the Americans did 2 years ago. I still remember their screams. So, let’s try to avoid childish comments.
How about the Istrebitel Sputnik? Is still operative?
As far I know it was the lone thing that demonstrated a real ASAT capability before the Chinese test.
The dedicated F-15 just launched a missile that supposedly intercepted “a point in the space” and the MiG-31D performed just the ascension tests.
The Russians learn fast the western art of hypocrisy
This is normal combat training, General Deinekin said. Actually, it was joint training. “We, Russia and the U.S., are not opponents. We are partners in the fight against terrorism. There are no serious threats posed by our planes appearing over American ships in neutral waters. Their mission was not just to fly over, but to take a picture of the vessel to make sure that it was not a dry cargo or container ship, but the Nimitz – the pride and a beauty of the American naval forces.”
:rolleyes:
Tu-95 doesn’t target US carriers. I would have been more fun whith a pair of Tu-22M3:D
They should’ve shot it down.
They are no so stupid to spit the Bear. Those who did it ended like … Adolph :p
I mean 1982 conclict.
The Argentinean Air force consistently found and atacked the British Task Forces during most of the 192 conflict. Nedless to say Russia has much more Recon assests than Argentina and that Tu-22 are much more capable than A-4.
Hm. Not sure if a stealthy cruise missile wouldn’t be the better idea than a castrated/IRBM’d ICBM. I mean, why fight a BMD system with a BM?
It will not be IRBMd. It will be a “short legs” ICBM (i.e. 6.500 km) to fullfil the INF “in paper” but to void it in reality 🙂 .
I don’t knonw what’s better. If a GLCM or a shortened ICBM. Who knows?
Sorry for the off-topic
Interesting! It follows almost perfectly the pattern predicted by Gen. Baluyevsky respect to development and deployments of Amercian ABM systems. So it is almost sure to see 2-stage Topol-m (i.e. Pioneer-M) targeting Europe and the far East in the next decade.
It may be possible withy an extremely powerfull emiter. IRBIS seems to follow that path. I am not sure on the data but, by increasing four-fold the raw power radiated (as IRBIS is claimed to do) surelly you can “see” smaller RCS objects.
that’s okay. Back in the day the ATF was going to be a Mach 4 aircraft that would have R2-D2 (“Pilot’s Associate”) in the back seat, directed energy weaponry, invisibility, and be built by robots in automated factories.
That’s in the F-35 rigth now!! 😀 And off course Tom Cruise will ride it like in Top Gun:dev2: Lots of bru-ha-ha was granted to the world. Late… the pale reality.:confused:
Mr Bush will not be happy on this
THAAD terminal phase? Yes, but an exo-atmospheric one. PAC-3, and the current S-400 are true terminal-phase defenses.
Supposedly the 40N6 BIG (so far on an endless testing phase) is able to reach 180 km ceiling.
The Aegis/Spy-1/SM-??? is an impressive combo.
S-400 must yet reach its full configuration and now it is just the last iteration on the S-300PM series. SM-3 seems to be the most capable system. BTW, it would be an interesting idea to adapt SM-3 to land in order to obtain an “American S-400”. This would have allowed to avoid splitting resources in many different projects (PAC-3, THAAD, partial funding to Arrow and MEADS). From an economical point of view seems wiser to concentrate resources to boost the performance of an unified system and SM-3 seems to be the best of such systems.
Angara engine tested