i think the 24 for aussie are out of lot 26 usn run they are all said to be the same and ours have 79’s
which indicates the whole ‘lot’ will have 79’s thats based on lot 26 is the lot they are building now and i dont know how long its been running or what the total run number is
I was of the impression that lot 26 started in 2006 (deliveries), so I doubt that any of the Aussie SHs are from that lot.
May be I did not go back many pages anyway the rebuttal was not posted, If a new thread was inappropriate my apologies.
Not that problematic. It’s more about the usual suspects jumping up and down once again.
Ok this is the second comment which says I should not have opened the thread. I did it because.
1. The Blog Post on the Eurofighter site trumpeting its victory over the F-15C is very recent, It has been under heated debate in several other fora, but I did not see it being posted here.
2. I did look for the typhoon thread and DACT thread to see if the initial report was posted, because it was not instead of posting that and the rebuttal I started a new thread with links to the article in question as well.
The issue was largely covered in the UAE ATLC F-22 vs Rafale vs Typhoon thread.
Doesn’t mean they don’t either. And given that it would be a software upgrade, those that don’t (yet) will almost certainly get the capability. (Maybe not the 18 V2 F-15Cs because of the low numbers.)
There is still a difference between growth potential and factual capabilities.
India was first export customer (1984-86, I think) and I don’t think they have received any birds in mid 90s.
If you google it you get some hits, which suggest that India received 10 MiG-29s in 1995 supposley SDs.
Because an AESA radar is capable of mulitasking(simultaneous a2a, a2g, comms, EA), and still remaining effective. That’s kind of the whole reason why everyone is moving towards AESA systems, due to this flexibility.
Doesn’t mean that every US AESA radar in service poses these capabilities.
IIRC India received some MiG-29SD (9.12SD) Fulcrum A in the mid 90s. These should be capable to use the R-77/RVV-AE as they feature the improved N-019M Topaz.
Was it really necessary to open another thread covering this topic?
Surprising that some people still don’t get that the information was first released weeks before it was posted at the Eurofighter blog. That they trumpet out good news is neither special, nor unique to Eurofighter. So who cares except for some fanboys?
this is starting to go platform vs platform, DACT isnt and is about interoperability and systems
It’s more about improving pilot skills and tactics. While large scale exercises are mostly aimed at interoperability etc. as well, DACT is not necessarily about systems and interoperability.
Well since this is a Typhoon thread and i wouldnt want to open another topic for such a simple question , may i ask , the gun on the Typhoon located at the root of the right wing , right? Is it covered whit some sort of ..well …cover like WW2 Spitfires had for instance that i suposed to break when the cannon is fired ?
Correct.
I think they’re waiting for favourable weather conditions now.
Official pics/footage may be some weeks away…….D’oh!!
Thanks for the info. Wasn’t the last prediction 29th december? They seem to like that number 29. But it appears to be really difficult to filter useful information.
Difficult, but I tend towards the Viggen. Everything prior the Draken looks ugly in my opinion.
The first flight will be on the 29 January.
2015?:diablo:
Trolls, really its not even funny anymore.
My source are on paper not on a website. But I cannot scan them actually (I’m more than 9000km away from home, are, and I have a lot of work to do before going back…). But it’s was official information given to the MOD (UK) by ratheon, so I think these informations are credible.
And more than 180km, as you say, is not credible. Meteor don’t claim that, and it’s propulsed by a ramjet…
120km, in other hand, is quite credible. Inferior to the range provided by extrems solution (ramjet like meteor, or big missile like R37), but way more than all classic competitor.
@+, Arka
Certainly depends on what the range refers to exactly RMax or just the typical engagement range which varies depending on the conditions and is often much lower than the stated RMax.